From: "Bernatowicz, Marcin" <marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>
To: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/xe/vf: Don't expose privileged GT debugfs files if VF
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 12:29:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <79f1dc52-8342-4e49-86e6-b89a9d3e7442@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250403142635.1821-4-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
On 4/3/2025 4:26 PM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> Some of the debugfs files require access to the registers that are
> not accessible to the VFs. Don't expose those files on VF drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> Cc: Marcin Bernatowicz <marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> ---
> v2: avoid "privileged" word, make it clear it's about VF/PF (Lucas)
> add hint for developers where to add new files (Lucas)
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_debugfs.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_debugfs.c
> index 2d63a69cbfa3..a88076e9cc7d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_debugfs.c
> @@ -299,20 +299,20 @@ static int hwconfig(struct xe_gt *gt, struct drm_printer *p)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static const struct drm_info_list debugfs_list[] = {
> - {"hw_engines", .show = xe_gt_debugfs_simple_show, .data = hw_engines},
> +/*
> + * only for GT debugfs files which can be safely used on the VF as well:
> + * - without access to the GT privileged registers
> + * - without access to the PF specific data
> + */
> +static const struct drm_info_list vf_safe_debugfs_list[] = {
> {"force_reset", .show = xe_gt_debugfs_simple_show, .data = force_reset},
> {"force_reset_sync", .show = xe_gt_debugfs_simple_show, .data = force_reset_sync},
> {"sa_info", .show = xe_gt_debugfs_simple_show, .data = sa_info},
> {"topology", .show = xe_gt_debugfs_simple_show, .data = topology},
> - {"steering", .show = xe_gt_debugfs_simple_show, .data = steering},
> {"ggtt", .show = xe_gt_debugfs_simple_show, .data = ggtt},
> - {"powergate_info", .show = xe_gt_debugfs_simple_show, .data = powergate_info},
> {"register-save-restore", .show = xe_gt_debugfs_simple_show, .data = register_save_restore},
> {"workarounds", .show = xe_gt_debugfs_simple_show, .data = workarounds},
> {"tunings", .show = xe_gt_debugfs_simple_show, .data = tunings},
> - {"pat", .show = xe_gt_debugfs_simple_show, .data = pat},
> - {"mocs", .show = xe_gt_debugfs_simple_show, .data = mocs},
> {"default_lrc_rcs", .show = xe_gt_debugfs_simple_show, .data = rcs_default_lrc},
> {"default_lrc_ccs", .show = xe_gt_debugfs_simple_show, .data = ccs_default_lrc},
> {"default_lrc_bcs", .show = xe_gt_debugfs_simple_show, .data = bcs_default_lrc},
> @@ -322,6 +322,15 @@ static const struct drm_info_list debugfs_list[] = {
> {"hwconfig", .show = xe_gt_debugfs_simple_show, .data = hwconfig},
> };
>
> +/* everything else should be added here */
> +static const struct drm_info_list pf_only_debugfs_list[] = {
> + {"hw_engines", .show = xe_gt_debugfs_simple_show, .data = hw_engines},
> + {"mocs", .show = xe_gt_debugfs_simple_show, .data = mocs},
> + {"pat", .show = xe_gt_debugfs_simple_show, .data = pat},
> + {"powergate_info", .show = xe_gt_debugfs_simple_show, .data = powergate_info},
> + {"steering", .show = xe_gt_debugfs_simple_show, .data = steering},
> +};
> +
> void xe_gt_debugfs_register(struct xe_gt *gt)
> {
> struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
> @@ -345,10 +354,15 @@ void xe_gt_debugfs_register(struct xe_gt *gt)
> */
> root->d_inode->i_private = gt;
>
> - drm_debugfs_create_files(debugfs_list,
> - ARRAY_SIZE(debugfs_list),
> + drm_debugfs_create_files(vf_safe_debugfs_list,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(vf_safe_debugfs_list),
> root, minor);
>
> + if (!IS_SRIOV_VF(xe))
> + drm_debugfs_create_files(pf_only_debugfs_list,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(pf_only_debugfs_list),
> + root, minor);
> +
> xe_uc_debugfs_register(>->uc, root);
>
> if (IS_SRIOV_PF(xe))
LGTM,
I tested this patch together with
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/640267/?series=145667&rev=1 (a
fix for guc_info on VF) using
igt@intel_sysfs_debugfs@xe-debugfs-read-all-entries,
I did not encounter any issues on the VF.
Some maintenance issue is with xe_debugfs@gt (moved to
igt@intel_sysfs_debugfs@xe-gt) which explicitly lists some of expected
debugfs nodes. @Matthew Do we need to keep xe_debugfs@gt test and
replicate the explicit file list logic or
igt@intel_sysfs_debugfs@xe-debugfs-read-all-entries (reads all exposed
debugfs entries) is sufficient ?
Tested-by: Marcin Bernatowicz <marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Marcin Bernatowicz <marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-09 10:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-03 14:26 [PATCH v2 0/3] VF: debugfs fixes Michal Wajdeczko
2025-04-03 14:26 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/xe/guc: Refactor GuC debugfs initialization Michal Wajdeczko
2025-04-10 17:20 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-04-03 14:26 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/xe/guc: Don't expose GuC privileged debugfs files if VF Michal Wajdeczko
2025-04-10 17:21 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-04-03 14:26 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/xe/vf: Don't expose privileged GT " Michal Wajdeczko
2025-04-03 20:28 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-03 20:56 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-04-03 21:30 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-09 10:29 ` Bernatowicz, Marcin [this message]
2025-04-10 17:22 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-04-03 18:43 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for VF: debugfs fixes (rev2) Patchwork
2025-04-03 18:44 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2025-04-03 18:45 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2025-04-03 19:01 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-04-03 19:04 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-04-03 19:05 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-04-04 0:24 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-04-04 4:52 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-04-04 10:53 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-04-11 10:12 ` Michal Wajdeczko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=79f1dc52-8342-4e49-86e6-b89a9d3e7442@linux.intel.com \
--to=marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox