Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Yadav, Sanjay Kumar" <sanjay.kumar.yadav@intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe: Don't wedge shared engine on stale faults from torn-down VMs
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 22:45:24 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7aaa165f-e426-4e05-9811-9aa96a48314e@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878c1246-d4fe-466b-a109-8e3f617ac546@intel.com>


On 14-09-2026 16:05, Yadav, Sanjay Kumar wrote:
>
> On 12-09-2026 02:15, Matthew Brost wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 12, 2026 at 12:53:01AM +0530, Sanjay Yadav wrote:
>>> A recoverable page fault generated by a process's completed migrate/BCS
>>> work can arrive after that process's VM has been closed and its ASID
>>> removed (abnormal exit while GPU work was in flight).
>>> xe_pagefault_service() returned an error for such faults, which is
>>> reported to the GuC/HW as an unsuccessful response. Repeated
>>> unsuccessful responses eventually escalate to an engine memory CAT
>>> error. Because the migrate/BCS engine is shared, that CAT error
>>> wedges it for unrelated processes, which then hang on their own
>>> copies.
>> Yikes. Do you have a reproducer for this? I wouldn't expect this
>> behavior from the hardware, as it appears to violate the expected
>> process isolation contract.
> Yes, there is a reproducer, "l0-abnormal-exit-repro", in GSD-13290 on 
> BMG. I have also attached the dmesg logs
> in the GSD from the drm-tip kernel, as well as from the older 7.0 
> kernel, where the issue was originally reported.
>>> Detect stale faults whose owning VM is closed or whose ASID no longer
>>> maps to a fault-capable VM, and drain them instead of replying
>>> unsuccessful.
>>>
>>> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
>> Fixes, CC stable if this is an issue.
> sure
>>
>>> Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot:claude-opus-4.8
>>> Signed-off-by: Sanjay Yadav <sanjay.kumar.yadav@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pagefault.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
>>>   1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pagefault.c 
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pagefault.c
>>> index c82b8bc8bc70..2827652ab8a3 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pagefault.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pagefault.c
>>> @@ -238,8 +238,10 @@ static struct xe_vm 
>>> *xe_pagefault_asid_to_vm(struct xe_device *xe, u32 asid)
>>>       vm = xa_load(&xe->usm.asid_to_vm, asid);
>>>       if (vm && xe_vm_in_fault_mode(vm))
>>>           xe_vm_get(vm);
>>> -    else
>>> +    else if (vm)
>>>           vm = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>>> +    else
>>> +        vm = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
>>>       up_read(&xe->usm.lock);
>>>         return vm;
>>> @@ -260,13 +262,27 @@ static int xe_pagefault_service(struct 
>>> xe_pagefault *pf)
>>>           return -EFAULT;
>>>         vm = xe_pagefault_asid_to_vm(xe, asid);
>>> -    if (IS_ERR(vm))
>>> +    if (IS_ERR(vm)) {
>>> +        if (PTR_ERR(vm) == -ENOENT) {
>>> +            drm_info(&xe->drm,
>>> +                 "xe_pf_debug: drain stale fault (no VM) asid=%u 
>>> addr=0x%llx\n",
>>> +                 asid, pf->consumer.page_addr);
>>> +            xe_pagefault_set_start_addr(pf, pf->consumer.page_addr);
>>> +            xe_pagefault_set_end_addr(pf, pf->consumer.page_addr);
>>> +            return 0;
>> Won't the page walker hotspin on faults until the executing queue is
>> descheduled from the hardware if we successfully acknowledge them? That
>> doesn't seem ideal.
>>
>> Matt
> agree with your point
> also with this patch[with_patch-752845-fix_run.txt attached in GSD] 
> from a 1.5h run (3,373 torn-down contexts)
> 95% of ASIDs re-faulted exactly once before being descheduled, 0 CAT 
> errors, 0 hangs.
> So the existing async teardown already deschedules the context within 
> a fault cycle or two.
>
> can I move it to teardown wait for the ASIDs queues to deregister and 
> drain its pending faults
> in xe_vm_close_and_put() before erasing the ASID, but that a larger 
> change. Happy to change either way.
> -Sanjay


Gentle ping

>>> +        }
>>>           return PTR_ERR(vm);
>>> +    }
>>>         down_read(&vm->lock);
>>>         if (xe_vm_is_closed(vm)) {
>>> -        err = -ENOENT;
>>> +        drm_info(&xe->drm,
>>> +             "xe_pf_debug: drain stale fault (closed VM) asid=%u 
>>> addr=0x%llx\n",
>>> +             asid, pf->consumer.page_addr);
>>> +        xe_pagefault_set_start_addr(pf, pf->consumer.page_addr);
>>> +        xe_pagefault_set_end_addr(pf, pf->consumer.page_addr);
>>> +        err = 0;
>>>           goto unlock_vm;
>>>       }
>>>   --
>>> 2.52.0
>>>

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-18 17:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-11 19:23 [PATCH] drm/xe: Don't wedge shared engine on stale faults from torn-down VMs Sanjay Yadav
2026-09-11 19:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 19:51 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for " Patchwork
2026-09-11 20:43 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-09-11 20:45 ` [PATCH] " Matthew Brost
2026-09-14 10:35   ` Yadav, Sanjay Kumar
2026-09-18 17:15     ` Yadav, Sanjay Kumar [this message]
2026-09-18 17:55       ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-21  4:48         ` Yadav, Sanjay Kumar
2026-09-12  5:42 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: success for " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7aaa165f-e426-4e05-9811-9aa96a48314e@intel.com \
    --to=sanjay.kumar.yadav@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=stuart.summers@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox