From: "Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
To: <imre.deak@intel.com>, Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/dp_mst: Fix dsc mst bw overhead calculation
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 16:45:13 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7b1cbe2d-bdd7-4ac7-812a-e5f31bba8dea@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZwZj-1Y3EKjy2iXP@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com>
On 10/9/2024 4:37 PM, Imre Deak wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 11:10:50AM +0530, Suraj Kandpal wrote:
>> Fix the DSC flag assignment based on the dsc_slice_count returned
>> to avoid divide by zero error.
>>
>> Fixes: 4e0837a8d00a ("drm/i915/dp_mst: Account for FEC and DSC overhead during BW allocation")
>> Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 7 ++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
>> index 4765bda154c1..bacd294d6bb6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
>> @@ -105,11 +105,16 @@ static int intel_dp_mst_bw_overhead(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>> if (dsc) {
>> int num_joined_pipes = intel_crtc_num_joined_pipes(crtc_state);
>>
>> - flags |= DRM_DP_BW_OVERHEAD_DSC;
>> dsc_slice_count = intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_count(connector,
>> adjusted_mode->clock,
>> adjusted_mode->hdisplay,
>> num_joined_pipes);
>> + /*
>> + * Try with dsc only if dsc_slice_count has a sane value i.e value is no
>> + * 0
>> + */
>> + if (dsc_slice_count)
>> + flags |= DRM_DP_BW_OVERHEAD_DSC;
> This would enable DSC, but with the wrong BW alloced. We'd need instead:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009110135.1216498-1-imre.deak@intel.com
Right, I meant something like that, Imre beat me to it :)
>
>> }
>>
>> overhead = drm_dp_bw_overhead(crtc_state->lane_count,
>> --
>> 2.43.2
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-09 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-09 5:40 [PATCH] drm/i915/dp_mst: Fix dsc mst bw overhead calculation Suraj Kandpal
2024-10-09 6:06 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for " Patchwork
2024-10-09 6:06 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-10-09 6:07 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-10-09 6:19 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-10-09 6:21 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-10-09 6:22 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-10-09 6:46 ` ✓ CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-10-09 10:00 ` [PATCH] " Jani Nikula
2024-10-09 10:45 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-10-09 11:10 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-10-09 11:07 ` Imre Deak
2024-10-09 11:15 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K [this message]
2024-10-09 11:35 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure for " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7b1cbe2d-bdd7-4ac7-812a-e5f31bba8dea@intel.com \
--to=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox