Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: Ilia Levi <ilia.levi@intel.com>, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: koby.elbaz@intel.com, shuicheng.lin@intel.com,
	thomas.hellstrom@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/xe/mmio_gem: fix fault handling for split VMA
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 14:05:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7baa79b5-a2e4-4064-8a19-c0f263a883e2@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260526125106.2806522-9-ilia.levi@intel.com>

Hi,

On 26/05/2026 13:51, Ilia Levi wrote:
> The fault handler currently assumes it always operates on a VMA spanning
> the entire GEM object. This does not hold when the VMA has been split,
> e.g. by a partial munmap or mprotect. In that case the handler may map
> wrong physical pages or cause SIGBUS.
> 
> Change the fault handler to map only the GEM subrange corresponding to
> the VMA, and do not set vm_pgoff to zero. Many DRM drivers do this
> because helpers like dma_mmap_pages() interpret vm_pgoff as an
> intra-buffer page offset; leaving the DRM fake offset there would break
> these helpers. Those drivers can get away with zeroing it because they
> map eagerly -- all PTEs are established before mmap returns, so vm_pgoff
> is never consulted again. This driver does not use such helpers and
> defers mapping to the fault handler, where vm_pgoff must be preserved:
> when the kernel splits a VMA it adjusts vm_pgoff, and the fault handler
> subtracts the GEM object's fake mmap offset to recover the page offset
> within the object.
> 
> Fixes: 1ffcf8b8ae8a ("drm/xe: Support for mmap-ing mmio regions")
> Assisted-by: GitHub-Copilot:claude-opus-4.6
> Signed-off-by: Ilia Levi <ilia.levi@intel.com>

Would it work if we did something like:

+static int xe_mmio_gem_vm_may_split(struct vm_area_struct *vma, 
unsigned long addr)
+{
+       return -EINVAL;
+}
+
  static const struct vm_operations_struct vm_ops = {
         .open = drm_gem_vm_open,
         .close = drm_gem_vm_close,
         .fault = xe_mmio_gem_vm_fault,
+       .may_split = xe_mmio_gem_vm_may_split,
  };

?

I don't think partial unmap or similar is really a real use case for 
this type of special mapping. IMO if we can just reject that would be 
simplest? What do you think here?

> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio_gem.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio_gem.c
> index c22a38e5616b..15e884ad3f1c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio_gem.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ static vm_fault_t xe_mmio_gem_vm_fault(struct vm_fault *);
>   struct xe_mmio_gem {
>   	struct drm_gem_object base;
>   	phys_addr_t phys_addr;
> +	unsigned long pgoff;
>   };
>   
>   static const struct vm_operations_struct vm_ops = {
> @@ -92,6 +93,8 @@ struct xe_mmio_gem *xe_mmio_gem_create(struct xe_device *xe, struct drm_file *fi
>   	if (err)
>   		goto free_gem;
>   
> +	obj->pgoff = drm_vma_node_start(&base->vma_node);
> +
>   	err = drm_vma_node_allow(&base->vma_node, file);
>   	if (err)
>   		goto free_gem;
> @@ -147,8 +150,6 @@ static int xe_mmio_gem_mmap(struct drm_gem_object *base, struct vm_area_struct *
>   	if ((vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED) == 0)
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   
> -	/* Set vm_pgoff (used as a fake buffer offset by DRM) to 0 */
> -	vma->vm_pgoff = 0;
>   	vma->vm_page_prot = pgprot_noncached(vm_get_page_prot(vma->vm_flags));
>   	vm_flags_set(vma, VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP | VM_DONTEXPAND | VM_DONTDUMP |
>   		     VM_DONTCOPY | VM_NORESERVE);
> @@ -190,7 +191,8 @@ static vm_fault_t xe_mmio_gem_vm_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>   	struct xe_mmio_gem *obj = to_xe_mmio_gem(base);
>   	struct drm_device *dev = base->dev;
>   	vm_fault_t ret = VM_FAULT_NOPAGE;
> -	unsigned long i;
> +	unsigned long addr, pfn;
> +	unsigned long pgoff;
>   	int idx;
>   
>   	if (!drm_dev_enter(dev, &idx)) {
> @@ -203,13 +205,15 @@ static vm_fault_t xe_mmio_gem_vm_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>   		return xe_mmio_gem_vm_fault_dummy_page(vmf);
>   	}
>   
> -	for (i = 0; i < base->size; i += PAGE_SIZE) {
> -		unsigned long addr = vma->vm_start + i;
> -		unsigned long phys_addr = obj->phys_addr + i;
> +	pgoff = vma->vm_pgoff - obj->pgoff;
> +	pfn = PHYS_PFN(obj->phys_addr) + pgoff;
>   
> -		ret = vmf_insert_pfn(vma, addr, PHYS_PFN(phys_addr));
> +	for (addr = vma->vm_start; addr < vma->vm_end; addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
> +		ret = vmf_insert_pfn(vma, addr, pfn);
>   		if (ret & VM_FAULT_ERROR)
>   			break;
> +
> +		pfn++;
>   	}
>   
>   	drm_dev_exit(idx);


  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-15 13:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-26 12:51 [PATCH v2 0/5] drm/xe/mmio_gem: fix fault handler and destroy path Ilia Levi
2026-05-26 12:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] drm/xe/mmio_gem: use write-back mapping for dummy page Ilia Levi
2026-05-26 12:51 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/xe/mmio_gem: fix fault handling for split VMA Ilia Levi
2026-07-15 13:05   ` Matthew Auld [this message]
2026-05-26 12:51 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/xe/mmio_gem: Revoke drm_vma_node on xe_mmio_gem destroy Ilia Levi
2026-05-26 12:51 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/xe/mmio_gem: cache the dummy page per object Ilia Levi
2026-05-26 12:51 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] drm/xe/mmio_gem: fix destroy flow Ilia Levi
2026-07-16 15:22   ` Matthew Auld
2026-05-26 12:58 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/mmio_gem: fix fault handler and destroy path (rev2) Patchwork
2026-05-26 13:42 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-05-26 15:20 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
2026-07-16 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] drm/xe/mmio_gem: fix fault handler and destroy path Matthew Auld

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7baa79b5-a2e4-4064-8a19-c0f263a883e2@intel.com \
    --to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=ilia.levi@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=koby.elbaz@intel.com \
    --cc=shuicheng.lin@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox