From: "Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
To: <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/vdsc: Account for DSC slice overhead in intel_vdsc_min_cdclk()
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2025 11:05:59 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7ee37384-d461-4732-ba8a-5429af979802@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aUk_5GZQrDIDN8fK@ideak-desk>
On 12/22/2025 6:26 PM, Imre Deak wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2025 at 10:14:43AM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
>> When DSC is enabled on a pipe, the pipe pixel rate input to the
>> CDCLK frequency and pipe joining calculation needs an adjustment to
>> account for compression overhead "bubbles" added at each horizontal
>> slice boundary.
>>
>> Account for this overhead while computing min cdclk required for DSC.
>>
>> v2: Get rid of the scaling factor and return unchanged pixel-rate
>> instead of 0.
>>
>> Bspec:68912
>> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
>> index ad5fe841e4b3..b91cd009be9d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
>> @@ -1050,15 +1050,52 @@ void intel_vdsc_state_dump(struct drm_printer *p, int indent,
>> drm_dsc_dump_config(p, indent, &crtc_state->dsc.config);
>> }
>>
>> +static
>> +int intel_dsc_get_pixel_rate_with_dsc_bubbles(int pixel_rate, int htotal,
>> + int dsc_horizontal_slices)
>> +{
>> + int dsc_slice_bubbles;
>> + u64 num;
>> +
>> + if (!htotal)
> Should this also warn as !slice_width below?
Yeah can add add warn here..
>
>> + return pixel_rate;
>> +
>> + dsc_slice_bubbles = 14 * dsc_horizontal_slices;
>> + num = (u64)pixel_rate * (u64)(htotal + dsc_slice_bubbles);
> Better to use mul_u32_u32() to avoid the casts and 64-bit x 64-bit
> multiplication.
Ok sure will use mul_u32_u32 to avoid casts here.
>> +
>> + return (int)DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(num, (u64)htotal);
> Both casts are ensured by the compiler already, so no need for doing
> them explicitly.
Got it.
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +static
>> +int pixel_rate_with_dsc_bubbles(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, int pixel_rate)
>> +{
>> + struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state);
>> + const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode = &crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode;
>> + const struct drm_dsc_config *vdsc_cfg = &crtc_state->dsc.config;
>> + int dsc_horizontal_slices;
>> +
>> + if (drm_WARN_ON(display->drm, !vdsc_cfg->slice_width))
>> + return pixel_rate;
>> +
>> + dsc_horizontal_slices = vdsc_cfg->pic_width / vdsc_cfg->slice_width;
> The above looks to be the same as crtc_state->dsc.slice_count, aka the
> slices per scanline, could you use that instead?
Apparently we are not filling dsc.slice_count. We are filling
dsc.slice_width and the pic_width.
This parameter seems to be unused, perhaps can be dropped?
Regards,
Ankit
>
>> +
>> + return intel_dsc_get_pixel_rate_with_dsc_bubbles(pixel_rate,
>> + adjusted_mode->crtc_htotal,
>> + dsc_horizontal_slices);
>> +}
>> +
>> int intel_vdsc_min_cdclk(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>> {
>> struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state);
>> int num_vdsc_instances = intel_dsc_get_num_vdsc_instances(crtc_state);
>> + int pixel_rate;
>> int min_cdclk;
>>
>> if (!crtc_state->dsc.compression_enable)
>> return 0;
>>
>> + pixel_rate = pixel_rate_with_dsc_bubbles(crtc_state, crtc_state->pixel_rate);
>> +
>> /*
>> * When we decide to use only one VDSC engine, since
>> * each VDSC operates with 1 ppc throughput, pixel clock
>> @@ -1066,7 +1103,7 @@ int intel_vdsc_min_cdclk(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>> * If there 2 VDSC engines, then pixel clock can't be higher than
>> * VDSC clock(cdclk) * 2 and so on.
>> */
>> - min_cdclk = DIV_ROUND_UP(crtc_state->pixel_rate, num_vdsc_instances);
>> + min_cdclk = DIV_ROUND_UP(pixel_rate, num_vdsc_instances);
>>
>> if (crtc_state->joiner_pipes) {
>> int pixel_clock = intel_dp_mode_to_fec_clock(crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.clock);
>> @@ -1084,9 +1121,9 @@ int intel_vdsc_min_cdclk(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>> * => CDCLK >= compressed_bpp * Pixel clock / 2 * Bigjoiner Interface bits
>> */
>> int bigjoiner_interface_bits = DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 14 ? 36 : 24;
>> - int min_cdclk_bj =
>> - (fxp_q4_to_int_roundup(crtc_state->dsc.compressed_bpp_x16) *
>> - pixel_clock) / (2 * bigjoiner_interface_bits);
>> + int adjusted_pixel_rate = pixel_rate_with_dsc_bubbles(crtc_state, pixel_clock);
>> + int min_cdclk_bj = (fxp_q4_to_int_roundup(crtc_state->dsc.compressed_bpp_x16) *
>> + adjusted_pixel_rate) / (2 * bigjoiner_interface_bits);
>>
>> min_cdclk = max(min_cdclk, min_cdclk_bj);
>> }
>> --
>> 2.45.2
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-23 5:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-22 4:44 [PATCH] drm/i915/vdsc: Account for DSC slice overhead in intel_vdsc_min_cdclk() Ankit Nautiyal
2025-12-22 12:56 ` Imre Deak
2025-12-23 5:35 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K [this message]
2025-12-23 9:46 ` Imre Deak
2025-12-23 12:38 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-12-23 18:22 ` Imre Deak
2025-12-23 6:17 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for " Patchwork
2025-12-23 7:22 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-12-23 16:58 ` ✓ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7ee37384-d461-4732-ba8a-5429af979802@intel.com \
--to=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox