Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Belgaumkar, Vinay" <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
To: "Summers, Stuart" <stuart.summers@intel.com>,
	"intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "Vivi, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"Roper, Matthew D" <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] drm/xe/bmg: Update Wa_14022085890
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 11:41:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <83ec77ee-1aed-4926-866b-e1a6301109e2@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <85316ce01b40c0cf8775833c29c4843bbf281315.camel@intel.com>


On 6/3/2025 10:36 AM, Summers, Stuart wrote:
> On Mon, 2025-06-02 at 16:44 -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
>> Set GT min frequency to 1200Mhz once driver load is
>> complete.
>>
>> v2: Review comments (Rodrigo)
>> v3: Apply Wa earlier so user_req_min is not clobbered.
>>
>> Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
>> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c     | 5 +++++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa_oob.rules | 1 +
>>   2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
>> index 18c623992035..cb0563494fcc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
>> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@
>>   
>>   #define LNL_MERT_FREQ_CAP      800
>>   #define BMG_MERT_FREQ_CAP      2133
>> +#define BMG_MIN_FREQ           1200
>>   
>>   #define SLPC_RESET_TIMEOUT_MS 5 /* roughly 5ms, but no need for
>> precision */
>>   #define SLPC_RESET_EXTENDED_TIMEOUT_MS 1000 /* To be used only at
>> pc_start */
>> @@ -843,6 +844,9 @@ static int pc_adjust_freq_bounds(struct xe_guc_pc
>> *pc)
>>          if (pc_get_min_freq(pc) > pc->rp0_freq)
>>                  ret = pc_set_min_freq(pc, pc->rp0_freq);
>>   
>> +       if (XE_WA(pc_to_gt(pc), 14022085890))
>> +               ret = pc_set_min_freq(pc, max(BMG_MIN_FREQ,
>> pc_get_min_freq(pc)));
> Do we want this above the get_min_freq() call above? Seems like that
> would further limit which is what we'd want in that case right?

No, this is during SLPC init, we don't need to read the min freq at this 
point. We will adjust it later in the flow if there was a user request.

Thanks,

Vinay.

>
> Thanks,
> Stuart
>
>> +
>>   out:
>>          return ret;
>>   }
>> @@ -879,6 +883,7 @@ static int pc_set_mert_freq_cap(struct xe_guc_pc
>> *pc)
>>                  ret = xe_guc_pc_get_min_freq(pc, &pc-
>>> stashed_min_freq);
>>                  if (!ret)
>>                          ret = xe_guc_pc_get_max_freq(pc, &pc-
>>> stashed_max_freq);
>> +
>>                  if (ret)
>>                          return ret;
>>   
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa_oob.rules
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa_oob.rules
>> index 9efc5accd43d..75fbdab68d44 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa_oob.rules
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa_oob.rules
>> @@ -59,3 +59,4 @@ no_media_l3   MEDIA_VERSION(3000)
>>                  MEDIA_VERSION_RANGE(1301, 3000)
>>   16026508708    GRAPHICS_VERSION_RANGE(1200, 3001)
>>                  MEDIA_VERSION_RANGE(1300, 3000)
>> +14022085890    GRAPHICS_VERSION(2001)

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-03 18:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-02 23:44 [PATCH v3 0/4] drm/xe/bmg: Update some WAs Vinay Belgaumkar
2025-06-02 23:44 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] drm/xe/bmg: Update Wa_14022085890 Vinay Belgaumkar
2025-06-03 17:36   ` Summers, Stuart
2025-06-03 18:41     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay [this message]
2025-06-03 19:31       ` Summers, Stuart
2025-06-03 20:31         ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2025-06-04  0:06           ` Summers, Stuart
2025-06-07  0:09             ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-06-11 22:44               ` Summers, Stuart
2025-06-11 23:02               ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-06-11 23:31                 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-06-12  6:49                   ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-06-02 23:44 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] drm/xe/guc: Ignore GuC CT errors when wedged Vinay Belgaumkar
2025-06-03 17:34   ` Summers, Stuart
2025-06-03 18:42     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2025-06-04  0:09       ` Summers, Stuart
2025-06-07  0:10       ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-06-02 23:44 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] drm/xe/bmg: Update Wa_22019338487 Vinay Belgaumkar
2025-06-05  4:18   ` Nilawar, Badal
2025-06-07  0:09   ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-06-02 23:44 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] drm/xe/bmg: Update Wa_16023588340 Vinay Belgaumkar
2025-06-02 23:53 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/bmg: Update some WAs (rev3) Patchwork
2025-06-02 23:53 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2025-06-02 23:54 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2025-06-03  0:05 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-06-03  0:07 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-06-03  0:08 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-06-03  0:42 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-06-04  3:36 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=83ec77ee-1aed-4926-866b-e1a6301109e2@intel.com \
    --to=vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=stuart.summers@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox