Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/xe/oa: Combined diff of changes between v10 and v11
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2024 21:43:55 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8534t56xno.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240305052136.2405509-2-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>

On Mon, 04 Mar 2024 21:21:36 -0800, Ashutosh Dixit wrote:
>

Hi Umesh,

> The diff between v10 and v11 consists of the following uapi changes:
> * Use a chain of drm_xe_ext_set_property struct's also for stream
>   reconfiguration (using DRM_XE_PERF_IOCTL_CONFIG perf fd ioctl). This
>   will enable additional properties such as syncobj's during stream
>   reconfiguration.
> * Add extensions also to output structs from the kernel so they can also be
>   extended if needed in the future
> * Change DRM_XE_PERF ioctl number to 0x0b

Just wanted to propose a few minor tweaks to the Perf/OA uapi with this
patch. I have sent the new series with these changes here:

https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/121084/#rev11

But didn't copy you on the series itself (just this combined diff) so as
not to spam you. I have also retained your previous R-b's on the patches.

So please just take a look at this combined diff and let me know if there's
anything here you don't agree with or want done differently.

Thanks.
--
Ashutosh

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-05  5:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-05  5:21 [PATCH 0/1] Xe OA Consolidated Diffs Ashutosh Dixit
2024-03-05  5:21 ` [PATCH 1/1] drm/xe/oa: Combined diff of changes between v10 and v11 Ashutosh Dixit
2024-03-05  5:43   ` Dixit, Ashutosh [this message]
2024-03-05  5:26 ` ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for Xe OA Consolidated Diffs Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8534t56xno.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
    --to=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox