From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/xe/oa: Combined diff of changes between v10 and v11
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2024 21:43:55 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8534t56xno.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240305052136.2405509-2-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
On Mon, 04 Mar 2024 21:21:36 -0800, Ashutosh Dixit wrote:
>
Hi Umesh,
> The diff between v10 and v11 consists of the following uapi changes:
> * Use a chain of drm_xe_ext_set_property struct's also for stream
> reconfiguration (using DRM_XE_PERF_IOCTL_CONFIG perf fd ioctl). This
> will enable additional properties such as syncobj's during stream
> reconfiguration.
> * Add extensions also to output structs from the kernel so they can also be
> extended if needed in the future
> * Change DRM_XE_PERF ioctl number to 0x0b
Just wanted to propose a few minor tweaks to the Perf/OA uapi with this
patch. I have sent the new series with these changes here:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/121084/#rev11
But didn't copy you on the series itself (just this combined diff) so as
not to spam you. I have also retained your previous R-b's on the patches.
So please just take a look at this combined diff and let me know if there's
anything here you don't agree with or want done differently.
Thanks.
--
Ashutosh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-05 5:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-05 5:21 [PATCH 0/1] Xe OA Consolidated Diffs Ashutosh Dixit
2024-03-05 5:21 ` [PATCH 1/1] drm/xe/oa: Combined diff of changes between v10 and v11 Ashutosh Dixit
2024-03-05 5:43 ` Dixit, Ashutosh [this message]
2024-03-05 5:26 ` ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for Xe OA Consolidated Diffs Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8534t56xno.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--to=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox