From: "Sundaresan, Sujaritha" <sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com>
To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe: Add base performance sysfs attributes
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 14:18:55 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8656f42b-dbb7-d380-8499-9193e9504347@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <286c8c28-7bb1-f6c6-d8ed-da4875ffa105@intel.com>
On 9/3/2023 7:06 PM, Sundaresan, Sujaritha wrote:
>
> On 9/2/2023 2:05 AM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 05:45:44PM +0530, Sujaritha Sundaresan wrote:
>>> Add the following attribute to Xe sysfs
>>> - base_freq_factor
>>> - base_freq_factor.scale
>>> - base_freq_rp0
>>> - base_freq_rpn
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sujaritha Sundaresan <sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c | 116
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pcode_api.h | 19 +++++
>>> 2 files changed, 135 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
>>> index c03bb58e7049..6a139d1dbf66 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
>> again, this has nothing to do with guc_pc.
>> We clearly need a new component to handle the frequency.
>
> Right. will look to define a new xe_freq component
>
> Thanks,
>
> Suja
Hi Rodrigo,
I've moved a lot of the frequency attributes I'm adding to a new file
with a new xe_freq component.
Does that work for this ?
Thanks,
Suja
>
>
>>
>>> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
>>> #include "xe_map.h"
>>> #include "xe_mmio.h"
>>> #include "xe_pcode.h"
>>> +#include "xe_pcode_api.h"
>>> #define MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB 0x140000
>>> @@ -37,6 +38,9 @@
>>> #define GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER 50
>>> #define GEN9_FREQ_SCALER 3
>>> +#define U8_8_VAL_MASK 0xffff
>>> +#define U8_8_SCALE_TO_VALUE "0.00390625"
>>> +
>>> /**
>>> * DOC: GuC Power Conservation (PC)
>>> *
>>> @@ -642,6 +646,112 @@ static const struct attribute *pc_attrs[] = {
>>> NULL
>>> };
>>> +static ssize_t freq_factor_scale_show(struct device *dev,
>>> + struct device_attribute *attr,
>>> + char *buff)
>>> +{
>>> + return sysfs_emit(buff, "%s\n", U8_8_SCALE_TO_VALUE);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static ssize_t base_freq_factor_show(struct device *dev,
>>> + struct device_attribute *attr,
>>> + char *buff)
>>> +{
>>> + struct kobject *kobj = &dev->kobj;
>>> + struct xe_gt *gt = kobj_to_gt(kobj);
>>> + u32 val;
>>> + int err;
>>> +
>>> + err = xe_pcode_read_p(gt, PVC_PCODE_QOS_MULTIPLIER_GET,
>>> + PCODE_MBOX_DOMAIN_CHIPLET,
>>> + PCODE_MBOX_DOMAIN_BASE, &val);
>>> + if (err)
>>> + return err;
>>> +
>>> + val &= U8_8_VAL_MASK;
>>> +
>>> + return sysfs_emit(buff, "%u\n", val);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static ssize_t base_freq_factor_store(struct device *dev,
>>> + struct device_attribute *attr,
>>> + const char *buff, size_t count)
>>> +{
>>> + struct kobject *kobj = &dev->kobj;
>>> + struct xe_gt *gt = kobj_to_gt(kobj);
>>> + u32 val;
>>> + int err;
>>> +
>>> + err = kstrtou32(buff, 0, &val);
>>> + if (err)
>>> + return err;
>>> +
>>> + if (val > U8_8_VAL_MASK)
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> + err = xe_pcode_write_p(gt, PVC_PCODE_QOS_MULTIPLIER_SET,
>>> + PCODE_MBOX_DOMAIN_CHIPLET,
>>> + PCODE_MBOX_DOMAIN_BASE, val);
>>> + if (err)
>>> + return err;
>>> +
>>> + return count;
>>> +}
>>> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(base_freq_factor);
>>> +static struct device_attribute dev_attr_base_freq_factor_scale =
>>> + __ATTR(base_freq_factor.scale, 0444, freq_factor_scale_show,
>>> NULL);
>>> +
>>> +
>>> +static ssize_t base_freq_rp0_show(struct device *dev, struct
>>> device_attribute *attr,
>>> + char *buff)
>>> +{
>>> + struct kobject *kobj = &dev->kobj;
>>> + struct xe_gt *gt = kobj_to_gt(kobj);
>>> + u32 val;
>>> + int err;
>>> +
>>> + err = xe_pcode_read_p(gt, XEHP_PCODE_FREQUENCY_CONFIG,
>>> + PCODE_MBOX_FC_SC_READ_FUSED_P0,
>>> + PCODE_MBOX_DOMAIN_BASE, &val);
>>> + if (err)
>>> + return err;
>>> +
>>> + /* data_out - Fused P0 for domain ID in units of 50 MHz */
>>> + val *= GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER;
>>> +
>>> + return sysfs_emit(buff, "%u\n", val);
>>> +}
>>> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(base_freq_rp0);
>>> +
>>> +static ssize_t base_freq_rpn_show(struct device *dev, struct
>>> device_attribute *attr,
>>> + char *buff)
>>> +{
>>> + struct kobject *kobj = &dev->kobj;
>>> + struct xe_gt *gt = kobj_to_gt(kobj);
>>> + u32 val;
>>> + int err;
>>> +
>>> + err = xe_pcode_read_p(gt, XEHP_PCODE_FREQUENCY_CONFIG,
>>> + PCODE_MBOX_FC_SC_READ_FUSED_PN,
>>> + PCODE_MBOX_DOMAIN_BASE, &val);
>>> + if (err)
>>> + return err;
>>> +
>>> + /* data_out - Fused Pn for domain ID in units of 50 MHz */
>>> + val *= GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER;
>>> +
>>> + return sysfs_emit(buff, "%u\n", val);
>>> +}
>>> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(base_freq_rpn);
>>> +
>>> +static const struct attribute *pvc_perf_power_attrs[] = {
>>> + &dev_attr_base_freq_factor.attr,
>>> + &dev_attr_base_freq_factor_scale.attr,
>>> + &dev_attr_base_freq_rp0.attr,
>>> + &dev_attr_base_freq_rpn.attr,
>>> + NULL
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> static void mtl_init_fused_rp_values(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
>>> {
>>> struct xe_gt *gt = pc_to_gt(pc);
>>> @@ -925,6 +1035,12 @@ int xe_guc_pc_init(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
>>> if (err)
>>> return err;
>>> + if (xe->info.platform == XE_PVC) {
>>> + err = sysfs_create_files(gt->sysfs, pvc_perf_power_attrs);
>>> + if (err)
>>> + return err;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> err = drmm_add_action_or_reset(&xe->drm, pc_fini, pc);
>>> if (err)
>>> return err;
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pcode_api.h
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pcode_api.h
>>> index 837ff7c71280..da4114bfaa7a 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pcode_api.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pcode_api.h
>>> @@ -30,6 +30,25 @@
>>> #define PCODE_READ_MIN_FREQ_TABLE 0x9
>>> #define PCODE_FREQ_RING_RATIO_SHIFT 16
>>> +#define XEHP_PCODE_FREQUENCY_CONFIG 0x6e /* xehp,
>>> pvc */
>>> +/* XEHP_PCODE_FREQUENCY_CONFIG sub-commands (param1) */
>>> +#define PCODE_MBOX_FC_SC_READ_FUSED_P0 0x0
>>> +#define PCODE_MBOX_FC_SC_READ_FUSED_PN 0x1
>>> +/* PCODE_MBOX_DOMAIN_* - mailbox domain IDs */
>>> +/* XEHP_PCODE_FREQUENCY_CONFIG param2 */
>>> +#define PCODE_MBOX_DOMAIN_NONE 0x0
>>> +#define PCODE_MBOX_DOMAIN_GT 0x1
>>> +#define PCODE_MBOX_DOMAIN_HBM 0x2
>>> +#define PCODE_MBOX_DOMAIN_MEDIAFF 0x3
>>> +#define PCODE_MBOX_DOMAIN_MEDIA_SAMPLER 0x4
>>> +#define PCODE_MBOX_DOMAIN_SYSTOLIC_ARRAY 0x5
>>> +#define PCODE_MBOX_DOMAIN_CHIPLET 0x6
>>> +#define PCODE_MBOX_DOMAIN_BASE_CHIPLET_LINK 0x7
>>> +#define PCODE_MBOX_DOMAIN_BASE 0x8
>>> +#define PVC_PCODE_QOS_MULTIPLIER_SET 0x67
>>> +/* See PCODE_MBOX_DOMAIN_* - mailbox domain IDs - param1 and 2 */
>>> +#define PVC_PCODE_QOS_MULTIPLIER_GET 0x66
>>> +
>>> /* PCODE Init */
>>> #define DGFX_PCODE_STATUS 0x7E
>>> #define DGFX_GET_INIT_STATUS 0x0
>>> --
>>> 2.25.1
>>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-12 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-01 12:15 [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/3] Add some performance and frequency sysfs nodes Sujaritha Sundaresan
2023-09-01 12:08 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for " Patchwork
2023-09-01 12:15 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/3] drm/xe: Add a couple of pcode helpers Sujaritha Sundaresan
2023-09-01 20:34 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-09-03 13:30 ` Sundaresan, Sujaritha
2023-09-12 5:08 ` Sundaresan, Sujaritha
2023-09-12 14:33 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-09-13 4:03 ` Sundaresan, Sujaritha
2023-09-25 8:13 ` Sundaresan, Sujaritha
2023-09-26 17:39 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-09-01 12:15 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe: Add base performance sysfs attributes Sujaritha Sundaresan
2023-09-01 20:35 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-09-03 13:36 ` Sundaresan, Sujaritha
2023-09-12 8:48 ` Sundaresan, Sujaritha [this message]
2023-09-12 14:34 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-09-13 4:01 ` Sundaresan, Sujaritha
2023-09-01 12:15 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/3, v2] drm/xe: Sysfs entries to query vram fused min, max frequency Sujaritha Sundaresan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8656f42b-dbb7-d380-8499-9193e9504347@intel.com \
--to=sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox