From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE300C3064D for ; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 10:26:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79FAD10E5AC; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 10:26:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gabe.freedesktop.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Qye1EXve"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.12]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61E1710E5A4; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 10:26:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1719916013; x=1751452013; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:mime-version; bh=5bnmTm9hk1PqaY6p+vhjYWr3fJiNhQHdASWi2hlVIWQ=; b=Qye1EXve3/wl+maEEumNSVL0ARGDWbk3TZKFZA2Rz3RdDEkZisCPVR0Q GhGtVq6WGsFgcuedC7hhCNchUMk5AN43qE5rRhvcD6FLfL6GynM0nLcr9 yeLiPW7wq678B8Tiu8xzD4OAiuiqJ0LSd7F6kcHt8bSjSpoAvfdz07J9Q 0bRT9DpBjOXcRc5GO16gksHquWxgvLe6exU6eYHA3NXMyQLV8OUoie8Ym 20IsGIKhb9PCAYAazEh1iBda6R4lRpIgWUb3HZsO/YZgetSGrURMYrs9a N5oVNdFAr6PtbMxk+99ygHFlqaSfPDry2KmyRkC9F1MI5//3l+8P+a7lk g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: RquYvpLUS3GvMhaiqdtPyw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 8g3T/MKCRVqxlsXtCxJ2CQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11120"; a="28476881" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.09,178,1716274800"; d="scan'208";a="28476881" Received: from orviesa010.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.150]) by orvoesa104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Jul 2024 03:26:53 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Hb+1UAvwSqyRH68gsEr3sg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: xqL+kXIqRIODCWfzuJlGZA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.09,178,1716274800"; d="scan'208";a="45747261" Received: from bergbenj-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.246.179]) by orviesa010-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Jul 2024 03:26:49 -0700 From: Jani Nikula To: Matthew Auld , intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Jonathan Cavitt , Matt Roper , Lucas De Marchi , Vinod Govindapillai , Rodrigo Vivi Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915: disable fbc due to Wa_16023588340 In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo References: <20240701132754.101832-3-matthew.auld@intel.com> <20240701132754.101832-4-matthew.auld@intel.com> <87ikxo9pi1.fsf@intel.com> <87a5j09mb6.fsf@intel.com> Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2024 13:26:46 +0300 Message-ID: <871q4c9jix.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel Xe graphics driver List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-xe-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-xe" On Tue, 02 Jul 2024, Matthew Auld wrote: > So no major objections with going back to v1 from your side? In > addition, merging both patches via drm-xe-next would be acceptable? As discussed, and FYI to others, no objections on v1 from me, and ack on merging via drm-xe-next. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel