From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/display: Use acpi_target_system_state only if ACPI_SLEEP is enabled
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2023 18:39:07 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871qfciq90.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZPclzYMmBovI4VlQ@fdugast-desk.home>
On Tue, 05 Sep 2023, Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 01:12:02PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Fri, 01 Sep 2023, Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com> wrote:
>> > This fixes the build when ACPI_SLEEP is disabled.
>>
>> What is the build failure exactly? It's usually helpful to copy-paste
>> the error in the commit message.
>
> Sure, I will add it to the commit message in the next revision. Here it is:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_display.c:334:23: error: implicit declaration of function ‘acpi_target_system_state’; did you mean ‘acpi_get_system_info’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 334 | bool s2idle = acpi_target_system_state() < ACPI_STATE_S3;
>
>>
>> acpi_target_system_state() should evaluate to ACPI_STATE_S0 for
>> CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP=n, and the changes here would be unnecessary.
>>
>> Most likely the problem is CONFIG_ACPI=n leading to <acpi/acpi_bus.h>
>> not being included at all, and the function not being present. Directly
>> including <acpi/acpi_bus.h> would be the cleaner fix.
>
> It seems that with CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP=n, acpi_target_sleep_state evaluates to
> ACPI_STATE_S0 but acpi_target_system_state is not defined as it is compiled out
> in acpi/sleep.c, which causes the error above. Including <acpi/acpi_bus.h> does
> not help.
Meh. I was lookig at sleep.h defining it as static inline for
CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP=n:
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP
u32 acpi_target_system_state(void);
#else
static inline u32 acpi_target_system_state(void) { return ACPI_STATE_S0; }
#endif
But the whole thing is wrapped inside #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI.
i915_driver.c has a wrapper for this, suspend_to_idle(). I guess have to
mimic that then to not duplicate the #ifdefs.
BR,
Jani.
>
> Regards,
> Francois
>
>>
>> BR,
>> Jani.
>>
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_display.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
>> > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_display.c
>> > index b6b547c4877c..54f52b6d702d 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_display.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_display.c
>> > @@ -331,7 +331,12 @@ static void intel_suspend_encoders(struct xe_device *xe)
>> >
>> > void xe_display_pm_suspend(struct xe_device *xe)
>> > {
>> > - bool s2idle = acpi_target_system_state() < ACPI_STATE_S3;
>> > + bool s2idle;
>> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP)
>> > + s2idle = acpi_target_system_state() < ACPI_STATE_S3;
>> > +#else
>> > + s2idle = true;
>> > +#endif
>> > if (!xe->info.enable_display)
>> > return;
>> >
>> > @@ -360,7 +365,12 @@ void xe_display_pm_suspend(struct xe_device *xe)
>> >
>> > void xe_display_pm_suspend_late(struct xe_device *xe)
>> > {
>> > - bool s2idle = acpi_target_system_state() < ACPI_STATE_S3;
>> > + bool s2idle;
>> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP)
>> > + s2idle = acpi_target_system_state() < ACPI_STATE_S3;
>> > +#else
>> > + s2idle = true;
>> > +#endif
>> > if (!xe->info.enable_display)
>> > return;
>>
>> --
>> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-05 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-01 16:03 [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/display: Use acpi_target_system_state only if ACPI_SLEEP is enabled Francois Dugast
2023-09-01 16:39 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for " Patchwork
2023-09-01 16:39 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2023-09-01 16:40 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2023-09-01 16:47 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2023-09-01 16:48 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
2023-09-01 16:48 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2023-09-01 17:19 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-09-01 20:18 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH] " Rodrigo Vivi
2023-09-05 14:46 ` Francois Dugast
2023-09-04 10:12 ` Jani Nikula
2023-09-05 12:57 ` Francois Dugast
2023-09-05 15:39 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871qfciq90.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=francois.dugast@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).