From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>,
Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/9] drm/xe: Error handling in xe_force_wake_get()
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 09:37:22 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8734mmwm71.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240830052326.3707019-2-himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
On Fri, 30 Aug 2024, Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com> wrote:
> If an acknowledgment timeout occurs for a domain awake request, put to
> sleep all domains awakened by the caller and decrease the reference
> count for all requested domains. This prevents xe_force_wake_get() from
> leaving an unhandled reference count in case of failure.
> While at it, add simple kernel-doc for xe_force_wake_get() and
> xe_force_wake_put() functions.
>
> Cc: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> Cc: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
> index b263fff15273..8aa8d9b41052 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
> @@ -150,31 +150,73 @@ static int domain_sleep_wait(struct xe_gt *gt,
> (ffs(tmp__) - 1))) && \
> domain__->reg_ctl.addr)
>
> +/**
> + * xe_force_wake_get : Increase the domain refcount; if it was 0 initially, wake the domain
> + * @fw: struct xe_force_wake
> + * @domains: forcewake domains to get refcount on
> + *
> + * Increment refcount for the force-wake domain. If the domain is
> + * asleep, awaken it and wait for acknowledgment within the specified
> + * timeout. If a timeout occurs, decrement the refcount and put the
> + * caller awaken domains to sleep.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success or 1 on ack timeout from domains.
Please stick to conventions on error returns, i.e. please use defined
negative error values instead of magic 1.
> + */
> int xe_force_wake_get(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
> enum xe_force_wake_domains domains)
> {
> struct xe_gt *gt = fw->gt;
> struct xe_force_wake_domain *domain;
> - enum xe_force_wake_domains tmp, woken = 0;
> + enum xe_force_wake_domains tmp, awake_rqst = 0, awake_ack = 0;
> unsigned long flags;
> int ret = 0;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&fw->lock, flags);
> for_each_fw_domain_masked(domain, domains, fw, tmp) {
> if (!domain->ref++) {
> - woken |= BIT(domain->id);
> + awake_rqst |= BIT(domain->id);
> domain_wake(gt, domain);
> }
> }
> - for_each_fw_domain_masked(domain, woken, fw, tmp) {
> - ret |= domain_wake_wait(gt, domain);
> + for_each_fw_domain_masked(domain, awake_rqst, fw, tmp) {
> + if (domain_wake_wait(gt, domain) == 0)
> + awake_ack |= BIT(domain->id);
> + }
> +
> + ret = (awake_ack == awake_rqst) ? 0 : 1;
> +
> + /*
> + * If @domains is XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL and an acknowledgment times out
> + * for any domain, decrease the reference count and put the awake
> + * domains to sleep. For individual domains, just decrement the
> + * reference count.
> + */
> + if (ret) {
> + for_each_fw_domain_masked(domain, awake_rqst, fw, tmp) {
> + if (!--domain->ref && (awake_ack & BIT(domain->id)))
> + domain_sleep(gt, domain);
> + }
> + awake_ack = 0;
> }
> - fw->awake_domains |= woken;
> +
> + fw->awake_domains |= awake_ack;
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fw->lock, flags);
>
> return ret;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * xe_force_wake_put - Decrement the refcount and put domain to sleep if refcount becomes 0
> + * @fw: Pointer to the force wake structure
> + * @domains: forcewake domains to put reference
> + *
> + * This function reduces the reference counts for specified domains. If
> + * refcount for any of the specified domain reaches 0, it puts the domain to sleep
> + * and waits for acknowledgment for domain to sleep within specified timeout.
> + * Ensure this function is called only in case of successful xe_force_wake_get().
> + *
> + * Returns 0 in case of success or non-zero in case of timeout of ack
> + */
> int xe_force_wake_put(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
> enum xe_force_wake_domains domains)
> {
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-30 6:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-30 5:23 [RFC 0/9] Fix xe_force_wake_get() failure handling Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-08-30 5:18 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for " Patchwork
2024-08-30 5:18 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-08-30 5:19 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-08-30 5:23 ` [RFC 1/9] drm/xe: Error handling in xe_force_wake_get() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-08-30 6:37 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2024-08-30 6:45 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2024-09-05 19:29 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-09-05 20:02 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2024-09-06 16:18 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-09-10 18:27 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-09-11 6:51 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2024-09-11 6:40 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2024-08-30 5:23 ` [RFC 2/9] drm/xe: Ensure __must_check for xe_force_wake_get() return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-05 19:30 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-08-30 5:23 ` [RFC 3/9] drm/xe/gsc: call xe_force_wake_put() only if xe_force_wake_get() succeeds Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-08-30 5:23 ` [RFC 4/9] drm/xe/gt: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-08-30 5:23 ` [RFC 5/9] drm/xe/guc: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-08-30 5:23 ` [RFC 6/9] drm/xe/oa: Handle force_wake_get failure in xe_oa_stream_init() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-08-30 5:23 ` [RFC 7/9] drm/xe/gt_tlb_invalidation_ggtt: Call xe_force_wake_put if xe_force_wake_get succeds Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-05 19:37 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-09-05 19:51 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2024-09-06 16:29 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-09-09 9:29 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2024-09-10 14:37 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-09-10 17:39 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-09-10 17:53 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-08-30 5:23 ` [RFC 8/9] drm/xe: Change return type to void for xe_force_wake_put Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-08-30 5:23 ` [RFC 9/9] drm/xe: forcewake debugfs open fails on xe_forcewake_get failure Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-08-30 5:32 ` ✓ CI.Build: success for Fix xe_force_wake_get() failure handling Patchwork
2024-08-30 5:37 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-08-30 5:42 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-08-30 6:05 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-08-30 17:41 ` ✓ CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8734mmwm71.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox