From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/6] drm/i915/hpd: Track HPD pins instead of ports for HPD pulse events
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 18:08:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874j08zsl4.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250304152917.3407080-2-imre.deak@intel.com>
On Tue, 04 Mar 2025, Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> wrote:
> Track the HPD pin instead of the corresponding encoder ports for pending
> short/long HPD pulse events. This is how the pending hotplug events are
> tracked and there is no reason for tracking the pulse events differently.
>
> After this change intel_hpd_trigger_irq() will set the short pulse event
> pending for all encoders using the given HPD pin. This doesn't change
> the behavior, as atm in case of multiple (2) encoders sharing the same
> pin only one will have a pulse handler, so for other encoders without a
> pulse handler the event is ignored. Also setting the pulse event pending
> for all encoders using the HPD pin is what happens after an actual HPD
> IRQ, the effect of calling intel_hpd_trigger_irq() should match this.
>
> In a following change this also makes it simpler to block the handling
> of a short/long pulse event on an HPD pin for all the encoders using
> this HPD pin.
>
> Suggested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h | 4 +--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hotplug.c | 30 +++++++++----------
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h
> index 554870d2494b3..d9952007635e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h
> @@ -169,8 +169,8 @@ struct intel_hotplug {
> u32 retry_bits;
> struct delayed_work reenable_work;
>
> - u32 long_port_mask;
> - u32 short_port_mask;
> + u32 long_hpd_pin_mask;
> + u32 short_hpd_pin_mask;
> struct work_struct dig_port_work;
>
> struct work_struct poll_init_work;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hotplug.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hotplug.c
> index 00d7b1ccf1900..9692b5c01aea9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hotplug.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hotplug.c
> @@ -353,28 +353,28 @@ static void i915_digport_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv =
> container_of(work, struct drm_i915_private, display.hotplug.dig_port_work);
> - u32 long_port_mask, short_port_mask;
> + u32 long_hpd_pin_mask, short_hpd_pin_mask;
> struct intel_encoder *encoder;
> u32 old_bits = 0;
>
> spin_lock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
> - long_port_mask = dev_priv->display.hotplug.long_port_mask;
> - dev_priv->display.hotplug.long_port_mask = 0;
> - short_port_mask = dev_priv->display.hotplug.short_port_mask;
> - dev_priv->display.hotplug.short_port_mask = 0;
> + long_hpd_pin_mask = dev_priv->display.hotplug.long_hpd_pin_mask;
> + dev_priv->display.hotplug.long_hpd_pin_mask = 0;
> + short_hpd_pin_mask = dev_priv->display.hotplug.short_hpd_pin_mask;
> + dev_priv->display.hotplug.short_hpd_pin_mask = 0;
> spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
>
> for_each_intel_encoder(&dev_priv->drm, encoder) {
> struct intel_digital_port *dig_port;
> - enum port port = encoder->port;
> + enum hpd_pin pin = encoder->hpd_pin;
> bool long_hpd, short_hpd;
> enum irqreturn ret;
>
> if (!intel_encoder_has_hpd_pulse(encoder))
> continue;
>
> - long_hpd = long_port_mask & BIT(port);
> - short_hpd = short_port_mask & BIT(port);
> + long_hpd = long_hpd_pin_mask & BIT(pin);
> + short_hpd = short_hpd_pin_mask & BIT(pin);
>
> if (!long_hpd && !short_hpd)
> continue;
> @@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ static void i915_digport_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
> ret = dig_port->hpd_pulse(dig_port, long_hpd);
> if (ret == IRQ_NONE) {
> /* fall back to old school hpd */
> - old_bits |= BIT(encoder->hpd_pin);
> + old_bits |= BIT(pin);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -407,9 +407,10 @@ static void i915_digport_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
> void intel_hpd_trigger_irq(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(dig_port->base.base.dev);
> + struct intel_encoder *encoder = &dig_port->base;
>
> spin_lock_irq(&i915->irq_lock);
> - i915->display.hotplug.short_port_mask |= BIT(dig_port->base.port);
> + i915->display.hotplug.short_hpd_pin_mask |= BIT(encoder->hpd_pin);
> spin_unlock_irq(&i915->irq_lock);
>
> queue_work(i915->display.hotplug.dp_wq, &i915->display.hotplug.dig_port_work);
> @@ -557,7 +558,6 @@ void intel_hpd_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> * only the one of them (DP) will have ->hpd_pulse().
> */
> for_each_intel_encoder(&dev_priv->drm, encoder) {
> - enum port port = encoder->port;
> bool long_hpd;
>
> pin = encoder->hpd_pin;
> @@ -577,10 +577,10 @@ void intel_hpd_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>
> if (long_hpd) {
> long_hpd_pulse_mask |= BIT(pin);
> - dev_priv->display.hotplug.long_port_mask |= BIT(port);
> + dev_priv->display.hotplug.long_hpd_pin_mask |= BIT(pin);
> } else {
> short_hpd_pulse_mask |= BIT(pin);
> - dev_priv->display.hotplug.short_port_mask |= BIT(port);
> + dev_priv->display.hotplug.short_hpd_pin_mask |= BIT(pin);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -920,8 +920,8 @@ void intel_hpd_cancel_work(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>
> spin_lock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
>
> - dev_priv->display.hotplug.long_port_mask = 0;
> - dev_priv->display.hotplug.short_port_mask = 0;
> + dev_priv->display.hotplug.long_hpd_pin_mask = 0;
> + dev_priv->display.hotplug.short_hpd_pin_mask = 0;
> dev_priv->display.hotplug.event_bits = 0;
> dev_priv->display.hotplug.retry_bits = 0;
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-04 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-04 15:29 [PATCH v5 0/6] drm/i915/dp: Fix link training interrupted by HPD pulse Imre Deak
2025-03-04 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] drm/i915/hpd: Track HPD pins instead of ports for HPD pulse events Imre Deak
2025-03-04 16:08 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2025-03-04 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] drm/i915/hpd: Let an HPD pin be in the disabled state when handling missed IRQs Imre Deak
2025-03-04 16:08 ` Jani Nikula
2025-03-04 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] drm/i915/hpd: Add support for blocking the IRQ handling on an HPD pin Imre Deak
2025-03-04 17:02 ` Jani Nikula
2025-03-04 19:50 ` Imre Deak
2025-03-05 11:48 ` [PATCH v6 " Imre Deak
2025-03-07 12:32 ` Jani Nikula
2025-03-04 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] drm/i915/dp: Fix link training interrupted by a short HPD pulse Imre Deak
2025-03-04 17:03 ` Jani Nikula
2025-03-04 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] drm/i915/dp: Queue a link check after link training is complete Imre Deak
2025-03-04 17:56 ` Jani Nikula
2025-03-04 19:59 ` Imre Deak
2025-03-05 11:48 ` [PATCH v6 " Imre Deak
2025-03-04 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] drm/i915/crt: Use intel_hpd_block/unblock() instead of intel_hpd_disable/enable() Imre Deak
2025-03-07 12:34 ` Jani Nikula
2025-03-04 16:22 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/i915/dp: Fix link training interrupted by HPD pulse Patchwork
2025-03-04 16:23 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2025-03-04 16:24 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2025-03-04 16:40 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-03-04 16:43 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-03-04 16:46 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-03-04 17:04 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-03-04 18:05 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-03-05 18:18 ` ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/i915/dp: Fix link training interrupted by HPD pulse (rev3) Patchwork
2025-03-05 18:20 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-03-05 18:22 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-03-05 18:41 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-03-05 19:59 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure for drm/i915/dp: Fix link training interrupted by HPD pulse (rev2) Patchwork
2025-03-05 21:27 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure for drm/i915/dp: Fix link training interrupted by HPD pulse (rev3) Patchwork
[not found] ` <174120906736.44240.15420770152155295918@64e06c682a23>
2025-03-11 14:37 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: " Imre Deak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874j08zsl4.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox