From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com, arun.r.murthy@intel.com,
Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_unreference_dpll__crtc
Date: Fri, 09 May 2025 13:31:53 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <875xiakrc6.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250509042729.1152004-16-suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
On Fri, 09 May 2025, Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> wrote:
> Rename intel_unreference_dpll_crtc to intel_dpll_unreference_crtc
> in an effort to keep names of exported functions start with the filename.
That's a fine goal, but to me "intel dpll unreference crtc" means drop
the crtc reference from dpll, not the other way round as it is...
> Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_setup.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> index d1399ab24d8c..c954515145a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> @@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ intel_reference_dpll(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> }
>
> /**
> - * intel_unreference_dpll_crtc - Drop a DPLL reference for a CRTC
> + * intel_dpll_unreference_crtc - Drop a DPLL reference for a CRTC
> * @crtc: CRTC on which behalf the reference is dropped
> * @pll: DPLL for which the reference is dropped
> * @dpll_state: the DPLL atomic state in which the reference is tracked
> @@ -466,7 +466,7 @@ intel_reference_dpll(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> * Drop a reference for @pll tracking the end of use of it by @crtc.
> */
> void
> -intel_unreference_dpll_crtc(const struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> +intel_dpll_unreference_crtc(const struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> const struct intel_dpll *pll,
> struct intel_dpll_state *dpll_state)
> {
> @@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ static void intel_unreference_dpll(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>
> dpll_state = intel_atomic_get_dpll_state(&state->base);
>
> - intel_unreference_dpll_crtc(crtc, pll, &dpll_state[pll->index]);
> + intel_dpll_unreference_crtc(crtc, pll, &dpll_state[pll->index]);
> }
>
> static void intel_put_dpll(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h
> index f497a9ec863d..8b596a96344f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h
> @@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ int intel_reserve_dplls(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> struct intel_encoder *encoder);
> void intel_release_dplls(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> struct intel_crtc *crtc);
> -void intel_unreference_dpll_crtc(const struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> +void intel_dpll_unreference_crtc(const struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> const struct intel_dpll *pll,
> struct intel_dpll_state *shared_dpll_state);
> void icl_set_active_port_dpll(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_setup.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_setup.c
> index ed4f305e0d3e..ee156cf2c5ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_setup.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_setup.c
> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static void intel_crtc_disable_noatomic_begin(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> crtc->base.enabled = false;
>
> if (crtc_state->intel_dpll)
> - intel_unreference_dpll_crtc(crtc,
> + intel_dpll_unreference_crtc(crtc,
> crtc_state->intel_dpll,
> &crtc_state->intel_dpll->state);
> }
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-09 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-09 4:27 [PATCH 00/18] DPLL framework redesign Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 01/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:04 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 02/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_dpll_funcs Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:05 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 03/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_shared_dpll_state Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:07 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 04/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename macro for_each_shared_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:07 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 05/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_shared_dpll_funcs Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:08 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 06/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_shared_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:13 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-12 4:00 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 07/18] drm/i915/dpll: Move away from using shared dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:17 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-12 4:02 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 08/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename crtc_get_shared_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:19 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 09/18] drm/i915/dpll: Change argument for enable hook in intel_dpll_funcs Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:22 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 10/18] drm/i915/drm: Rename disable hook in intel_dpll_global_func Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:24 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 11/18] drm/i915/dpll: Introduce new hook in intel_dpll_funcs Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:25 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 12/18] drm/i915/dpll: Add intel_encoder argument to get_hw_state hook Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:25 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 13/18] drm/i915/dpll: Change arguments for get_freq hook Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:27 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 14/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_[enable/disable]_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:29 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-12 3:19 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 15/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_unreference_dpll__crtc Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:31 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2025-05-12 4:27 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 16/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_<release/reserve>_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:32 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 17/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_compute_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:33 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 18/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_update_active_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:33 ` Jani Nikula
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-04-07 8:16 [PATCH 00/18] DPLL framework redesign Suraj Kandpal
2025-04-07 8:16 ` [PATCH 15/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_unreference_dpll__crtc Suraj Kandpal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=875xiakrc6.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=arun.r.murthy@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).