From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57AFEC4345F for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 14:09:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B81610EB3E; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 14:09:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gabe.freedesktop.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="ESc3bJAk"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.11]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A16AF10EB3E; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 14:08:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1714399739; x=1745935739; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:mime-version; bh=MMDS5y1s0zRD0OoyMoHkY0lpSuThQOQW2HBaNWWOTyY=; b=ESc3bJAkvf4JCjT5khRDdqg2/7/ynV8NjvTRg5wyoFWp4BQT3j42b7Xd z9KvN482OeURalfiybjdeaGzNJQ8DBuO/fTodZ86HRHzLTOcEaF0kbFbf Qgw6/+EwFbLJbsYm6Ww+bwHVlg/ZkxvtZcMb7Pgzy3LuHpTC+0u4Ja06H BCkkdSM6Nlrjj5GOXyBqd1lngSUhh/nTc+HTPZAUwziXBKvje/ksaKf/1 A0YHq0jCDkalDnPeCd1CqyqkX1ljodYfgBEnlzujB11VhvEmpxKG3lI/P cAE4c+d44zA7rTAmUaoeblFgi2toxsEKugNo6sq1KN531KV0JFNDQI2qj Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: PJPHvpTPRieVSzsmKHWa5w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: lkYxi12gQ5SO5Fhvv9FGJA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11059"; a="20675711" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,239,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="20675711" Received: from fmviesa009.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.149]) by fmvoesa105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Apr 2024 07:08:58 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: L0214hdnTJmxUyzW9Dui9g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 9C1KYrv2T9Kja+a3f9DC4w== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,239,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="26081215" Received: from aantonov-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.252.49.167]) by fmviesa009-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Apr 2024 07:08:56 -0700 From: Jani Nikula To: Rodrigo Vivi Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 000/123] drm/i915: remove implicit dev_priv local variable use In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo References: <87ttjo46ee.fsf@intel.com> Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 17:08:54 +0300 Message-ID: <875xw045xl.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel Xe graphics driver List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-xe-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-xe" On Mon, 29 Apr 2024, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > From a glance on these initial patches, it sounds really organized in > individual patches and easy to review. > Perhaps if we take this path we might just split the series in blocks > and merge these initial 17, and we continue over the next weeks. Ack. > However, if this is automated like you mentioned in the cover letter, > perhaps we can do one patch per directory? (display vs gvt vs gem? vs drm/i915/{.c,.h}) I'll look into it. The first natural batch came about when I moved some color regs, so I sent them [1]. BR, Jani. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/cover.1714399071.git.jani.nikula@intel.com -- Jani Nikula, Intel