From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: "Nilawar, Badal" <badal.nilawar@intel.com>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: matthew.d.roper@intel.com, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe/debugfs: Expose debugfs entry to check guc pc support
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 13:42:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878r4lpn0v.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4dd696da-90ef-4612-93de-e812d0a8336e@intel.com>
On Fri, 19 Jan 2024, "Nilawar, Badal" <badal.nilawar@intel.com> wrote:
> On 19-01-2024 13:48, Badal Nilawar wrote:
>> Expose debugfs entry to check if platform support GuC PC (SLPC) feature.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c | 8 ++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c
>> index c56fd7d59f05..2f474bf0e7c7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c
>> @@ -30,6 +30,13 @@ static struct xe_device *node_to_xe(struct drm_info_node *node)
>> return to_xe_device(node->minor->dev);
>> }
>>
>> +static int is_gucpc_supported(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
>> +{
>> + struct xe_device *xe = node_to_xe(m->private);
>> +
>> + return (int)!xe->info.skip_guc_pc;
> Will change this to
> return (xe->info.skip_guc_pc ? 0 : 1);
What do you expect to happen when you 'cat' the debugfs file?
BR,
Jani.
>
> Regards,
> Badal
>> +}
>> +
>> static int info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
>> {
>> struct xe_device *xe = node_to_xe(m->private);
>> @@ -67,6 +74,7 @@ static int info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
>>
>> static const struct drm_info_list debugfs_list[] = {
>> {"info", info, 0},
>> + {"is_gucpc_supported", is_gucpc_supported, 0},
>> };
>>
>> static int forcewake_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-19 11:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-19 8:18 [PATCH] drm/xe/debugfs: Expose debugfs entry to check guc pc support Badal Nilawar
2024-01-19 8:25 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-01-19 11:42 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2024-01-19 8:29 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for " Patchwork
2024-01-19 8:29 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-01-19 8:30 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-01-19 8:37 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-01-19 8:37 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-01-19 8:39 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-01-19 9:03 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-01-19 9:28 ` [PATCH] " Gupta, Anshuman
2024-01-19 9:31 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-01-19 9:35 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2024-01-19 9:57 ` Riana Tauro
2024-01-19 12:40 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-01-19 12:22 ` Nilawar, Badal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878r4lpn0v.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox