From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 660C7D6ED02 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2024 10:53:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35FEB10E11C; Thu, 21 Nov 2024 10:53:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gabe.freedesktop.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="CjfoFUZ2"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.14]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB1A010E11C for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2024 10:53:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1732186391; x=1763722391; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:mime-version; bh=vBjc8pp7QeaOlJVJMuXxy6JmVZLSm/GCXSEBxSyWRWg=; b=CjfoFUZ2LA5VgJsU8k3aDmd1EHnAx7D3aam1M8IU6BYRO2VK3xrKNnsP qR/niJfoO8SRsTT21/uYeschzpT5+L8RRVRYOwHJexlS0s33mw3QwYQHn 2QL/xMV3g1SaUw8g9dGQgdXIoA1MUkVF6toTWd9SAJGEmKo8MbT+JnPBq b6ZjyrMaj8AGffvOK6C+RQafN/MTAdCn++JaMbtT3iTdkTTGwgtsM91oN UMsb6a8kXZANVALmk0PlPpTIQeqtReGxgWElrlXAcPjYBRF0GVysLsD9s T6Q5fv7sj/JJDeW/9djMkk/UUL3Sa6a2HgaFSMLHEunLK30CnaPoF1oyo w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: eX9MCt2ERJyZNWIC2wKB+A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: qG3Q1bj1TDm7RFdQHgcJMw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11262"; a="32537462" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,172,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="32537462" Received: from orviesa001.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.141]) by fmvoesa108.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Nov 2024 02:53:11 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: waWAgeIWT+GcE3FPZBjehA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: /aiC4zDKSuWiftqrIa2Qow== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,172,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="127743738" Received: from kniemiec-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.246.95]) by smtpauth.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Nov 2024 02:53:09 -0800 From: Jani Nikula To: Lucas De Marchi Cc: Matthew Auld , intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, Rodrigo Vivi , ryszard.knop@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe: Sort again the info flags In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo References: <20241118223314.1969166-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com> <7f8fccfd-cb92-47bd-b6d3-bbed2a11094e@intel.com> <87wmgy14oe.fsf@intel.com> Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 12:53:05 +0200 Message-ID: <87a5ds26zy.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel Xe graphics driver List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-xe-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-xe" On Wed, 20 Nov 2024, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > IMO we should turn all these "checks run on the build machine" rather > than "checks executed on the target hosts" part of the hooks infra.... > because that is much more visible than scripts hidden inside the CI > pipeline. And then people can even run on their own machines. Going on a slight tangent, thinking aloud. Could we split the load more between running on target and running in, say, qemu? Like, there's no point in running some of the drm selftests on each target host. And could we move more towards splitting igt this direction too? BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel