From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: imre.deak@intel.com
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 16/16] drm/i915/dp: compute config for 128b/132b SST w/o DSC
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2025 13:35:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ed1km8oi.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z3atDqSwlbpmaZ6k@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com>
On Thu, 02 Jan 2025, Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 11:34:05PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> Enable basic 128b/132b SST functionality without compression. Reuse
>> intel_dp_mtp_tu_compute_config() to figure out the TU after we've
>> determined we need to use an UHBR rate.
>>
>> It's slightly complicated as the M/N computation is done in different
>> places in MST and SST paths, so we need to avoid trashing the values
>> later for UHBR.
>>
>> If uncompressed UHBR fails, we drop to compressed non-UHBR, which is
>> quite likely to fail as well. We still lack 128b/132b SST+DSC.
>>
>> We need mst_master_transcoder also for 128b/132b SST. Use cpu_transcoder
>> directly. Enhanced framing is "don't care" for 128b/132b link.
>>
>> v2: mst_master_transcoder, enhanced framing (Imre)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> index fba3af338280..d14a42f02ba8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> @@ -2525,8 +2525,8 @@ intel_dp_compute_config_limits(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>> limits->min_rate = intel_dp_min_link_rate(intel_dp);
>> limits->max_rate = intel_dp_max_link_rate(intel_dp);
>>
>> - /* FIXME 128b/132b SST support missing */
>> - if (!is_mst)
>> + /* FIXME 128b/132b SST+DSC support missing */
>> + if (!is_mst && dsc)
>> limits->max_rate = min(limits->max_rate, 810000);
>> limits->min_rate = min(limits->min_rate, limits->max_rate);
>>
>> @@ -2640,6 +2640,13 @@ intel_dp_compute_link_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>> */
>> ret = intel_dp_compute_link_config_wide(intel_dp, pipe_config,
>> conn_state, &limits);
>> + if (!ret && intel_dp_is_uhbr(pipe_config))
>> + ret = intel_dp_mtp_tu_compute_config(intel_dp,
>> + pipe_config,
>> + pipe_config->pipe_bpp,
>> + pipe_config->pipe_bpp,
>> + conn_state,
>> + 0, false);
>> if (ret)
>> dsc_needed = true;
>> }
>> @@ -3148,8 +3155,13 @@ intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>> pipe_config->limited_color_range =
>> intel_dp_limited_color_range(pipe_config, conn_state);
>>
>> - pipe_config->enhanced_framing =
>> - drm_dp_enhanced_frame_cap(intel_dp->dpcd);
>> + if (intel_dp_is_uhbr(pipe_config)) {
>
> Nit: no need for {} here and below.
I like this:
if (foo)
action();
but not this:
if (foo)
/* comment */
action();
so I prefer to add the {} for clarity.
Below I think it's just because the action() spans six lines...
>
> The patch looks ok:
> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Thanks!
>
>> + /* 128b/132b SST also needs this */
>> + pipe_config->mst_master_transcoder = pipe_config->cpu_transcoder;
>> + } else {
>> + pipe_config->enhanced_framing =
>> + drm_dp_enhanced_frame_cap(intel_dp->dpcd);
>> + }
>>
>> if (pipe_config->dsc.compression_enable)
>> link_bpp_x16 = pipe_config->dsc.compressed_bpp_x16;
>> @@ -3180,12 +3192,14 @@ intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>>
>> intel_dp_audio_compute_config(encoder, pipe_config, conn_state);
>>
>> - intel_link_compute_m_n(link_bpp_x16,
>> - pipe_config->lane_count,
>> - adjusted_mode->crtc_clock,
>> - pipe_config->port_clock,
>> - intel_dp_bw_fec_overhead(pipe_config->fec_enable),
>> - &pipe_config->dp_m_n);
>> + if (!intel_dp_is_uhbr(pipe_config)) {
>> + intel_link_compute_m_n(link_bpp_x16,
>> + pipe_config->lane_count,
>> + adjusted_mode->crtc_clock,
>> + pipe_config->port_clock,
>> + intel_dp_bw_fec_overhead(pipe_config->fec_enable),
>> + &pipe_config->dp_m_n);
>> + }
>>
>> /* FIXME: abstract this better */
>> if (pipe_config->splitter.enable)
>> --
>> 2.39.5
>>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-03 11:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-19 21:33 [PATCH v2 00/16] drm/i915/dp: 128b/132b uncompressed SST Jani Nikula
2024-12-19 21:33 ` [PATCH v2 01/16] drm/mst: remove mgr parameter and debug logging from drm_dp_get_vc_payload_bw() Jani Nikula
2024-12-31 15:24 ` Imre Deak
2025-01-02 10:15 ` [PATCH] " Jani Nikula
2025-01-02 11:50 ` Jani Nikula
2024-12-19 21:33 ` [PATCH v2 02/16] drm/i915/mst: drop connector parameter from intel_dp_mst_bw_overhead() Jani Nikula
2024-12-31 15:26 ` Imre Deak
2024-12-19 21:33 ` [PATCH v2 03/16] drm/i915/mst: drop connector parameter from intel_dp_mst_compute_m_n() Jani Nikula
2024-12-31 15:27 ` Imre Deak
2024-12-19 21:33 ` [PATCH v2 04/16] drm/i915/mst: change return value of mst_stream_find_vcpi_slots_for_bpp() Jani Nikula
2024-12-31 15:34 ` Imre Deak
2024-12-19 21:33 ` [PATCH v2 05/16] drm/i915/mst: remove crtc_state->pbn Jani Nikula
2024-12-31 15:35 ` Imre Deak
2024-12-19 21:33 ` [PATCH v2 06/16] drm/i915/mst: split out a helper for figuring out the TU Jani Nikula
2024-12-31 15:51 ` Imre Deak
2025-01-02 10:19 ` Jani Nikula
2024-12-19 21:33 ` [PATCH v2 07/16] drm/i915/mst: adapt intel_dp_mtp_tu_compute_config() for 128b/132b SST Jani Nikula
2024-12-31 16:16 ` Imre Deak
2025-01-02 10:30 ` Jani Nikula
2025-01-02 13:40 ` Imre Deak
2024-12-19 21:33 ` [PATCH v2 08/16] drm/i915/ddi: enable 128b/132b TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL mode for UHBR SST Jani Nikula
2024-12-31 16:21 ` Imre Deak
2024-12-19 21:33 ` [PATCH v2 09/16] drm/i915/ddi: 128b/132b SST also needs DP_TP_CTL_MODE_MST Jani Nikula
2024-12-31 16:27 ` Imre Deak
2024-12-19 21:33 ` [PATCH v2 10/16] drm/i915/ddi: write payload for 128b/132b SST Jani Nikula
2024-12-31 16:41 ` Imre Deak
2025-01-02 10:52 ` Jani Nikula
2025-01-02 13:54 ` Imre Deak
2024-12-19 21:34 ` [PATCH v2 11/16] drm/i915/ddi: initialize 128b/132b SST DP2 VFREQ registers Jani Nikula
2024-12-31 16:44 ` Imre Deak
2024-12-31 16:52 ` Imre Deak
2025-01-02 9:39 ` Jani Nikula
2025-01-02 12:09 ` Imre Deak
2024-12-19 21:34 ` [PATCH v2 12/16] drm/i915/ddi: enable ACT handling for 128b/132b SST Jani Nikula
2025-01-02 15:59 ` Imre Deak
2024-12-19 21:34 ` [PATCH v2 13/16] drm/i915/ddi: start distinguishing 128b/132b SST and MST at state readout Jani Nikula
2025-01-02 14:41 ` Imre Deak
2025-01-03 11:30 ` Jani Nikula
2024-12-19 21:34 ` [PATCH v2 14/16] drm/i915/ddi: handle 128b/132b SST in intel_ddi_read_func_ctl() Jani Nikula
2025-01-02 14:45 ` Imre Deak
2024-12-19 21:34 ` [PATCH v2 15/16] drm/i915/ddi: disable trancoder port select for 128b/132b SST Jani Nikula
2025-01-02 15:03 ` Imre Deak
2024-12-19 21:34 ` [PATCH v2 16/16] drm/i915/dp: compute config for 128b/132b SST w/o DSC Jani Nikula
2025-01-02 15:13 ` Imre Deak
2025-01-03 11:35 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2025-02-04 15:38 ` Imre Deak
2025-02-04 15:50 ` Jani Nikula
2024-12-19 21:40 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/i915/dp: 128b/132b uncompressed SST (rev2) Patchwork
2024-12-19 21:41 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-12-19 21:42 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-12-19 22:00 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-12-19 22:02 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-12-19 22:04 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-12-19 22:43 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-12-20 22:05 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-01-02 10:23 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/i915/dp: 128b/132b uncompressed SST (rev3) Patchwork
2025-01-02 10:24 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-01-02 10:25 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-01-02 10:43 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-01-02 10:45 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-01-02 10:47 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-01-02 11:21 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-01-02 12:47 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ed1km8oi.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).