Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: "Kandpal, Suraj" <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>,
	"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 4/3] drm/i915/hdcp: Make some functions static
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 14:12:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87frkm3sno.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SN7PR11MB6750584D241F8AF605F4927EE3F12@SN7PR11MB6750.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

On Fri, 07 Feb 2025, "Kandpal, Suraj" <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> Sent: Friday, February 7, 2025 4:29 PM
>> To: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@intel.com>; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org;
>> intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
>> Cc: Kandpal, Suraj <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH 4/3] drm/i915/hdcp: Make some functions static
>
> What happened here wrong serial number the patch itself looks okay maybe a refloat is required otherwise ci may not test it

I first sent 3 patches, and then sent the extra fourth one afterwards as
4/3. ;)

CI coped with it just fine [1].

[1] https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_144491v1/git-log-oneline.txt

> LGTM,
> Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>

Thanks for the review, series pushed to drm-intel-next.

BR,
Jani.

>
>>
>> With the debugfs implementation moved next to the implementation, we no
>> longer need to expose some of the functions. Make them static.
>>
>> Cc: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c | 10 +++++-----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.h |  6 ------
>>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
>> index 3d83db793baf..1aa4c0fd216f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
>> @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ int intel_hdcp_read_valid_bksv(struct
>> intel_digital_port *dig_port,  }
>>
>>  /* Is HDCP1.4 capable on Platform and Sink */ -bool
>> intel_hdcp_get_capability(struct intel_connector *connector)
>> +static bool intel_hdcp_get_capability(struct intel_connector
>> +*connector)
>>  {
>>       struct intel_digital_port *dig_port;
>>       const struct intel_hdcp_shim *shim = connector->hdcp.shim; @@ -
>> 265,7 +265,7 @@ static bool intel_hdcp2_prerequisite(struct
>> intel_connector *connector)  }
>>
>>  /* Is HDCP2.2 capable on Platform and Sink */ -bool
>> intel_hdcp2_get_capability(struct intel_connector *connector)
>> +static bool intel_hdcp2_get_capability(struct intel_connector
>> +*connector)
>>  {
>>       struct intel_hdcp *hdcp = &connector->hdcp;
>>       bool capable = false;
>> @@ -279,9 +279,9 @@ bool intel_hdcp2_get_capability(struct
>> intel_connector *connector)
>>       return capable;
>>  }
>>
>> -void intel_hdcp_get_remote_capability(struct intel_connector *connector,
>> -                                   bool *hdcp_capable,
>> -                                   bool *hdcp2_capable)
>> +static void intel_hdcp_get_remote_capability(struct intel_connector
>> *connector,
>> +                                          bool *hdcp_capable,
>> +                                          bool *hdcp2_capable)
>>  {
>>       struct intel_hdcp *hdcp = &connector->hdcp;
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.h
>> index 76bd3996f636..3a7905551051 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.h
>> @@ -21,7 +21,6 @@ struct intel_encoder;
>>  struct intel_hdcp_shim;
>>  struct seq_file;
>>  enum port;
>> -enum transcoder;
>>
>>  void intel_hdcp_atomic_check(struct drm_connector *connector,
>>                            struct drm_connector_state *old_state, @@ -
>> 39,11 +38,6 @@ void intel_hdcp_update_pipe(struct intel_atomic_state
>> *state,
>>                           const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>>                           const struct drm_connector_state *conn_state);
>> bool is_hdcp_supported(struct intel_display *display, enum port port); -
>> bool intel_hdcp_get_capability(struct intel_connector *connector); -bool
>> intel_hdcp2_get_capability(struct intel_connector *connector); -void
>> intel_hdcp_get_remote_capability(struct intel_connector *connector,
>> -                                   bool *hdcp_capable,
>> -                                   bool *hdcp2_capable);
>>  void intel_hdcp_component_init(struct intel_display *display);  void
>> intel_hdcp_component_fini(struct intel_display *display);  void
>> intel_hdcp_cleanup(struct intel_connector *connector);
>> --
>> 2.39.5
>

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-10 12:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-07 10:41 [PATCH 0/3] drm/i915/hdcp: move hdcp debugfs to intel_hdcp.c, cleanups Jani Nikula
2025-02-07 10:41 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/hdcp: Move HDCP debugfs to intel_hdcp.c Jani Nikula
2025-02-07 15:52   ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-02-07 10:41 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/hdcp: rename intel_connector to connector Jani Nikula
2025-02-07 15:42   ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-02-07 10:41 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/hdcp: Convert platform checks to use display->platform Jani Nikula
2025-02-07 15:55   ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-02-07 10:58 ` [PATCH 4/3] drm/i915/hdcp: Make some functions static Jani Nikula
2025-02-07 15:58   ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-02-10 12:12     ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2025-02-07 12:42 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/i915/hdcp: move hdcp debugfs to intel_hdcp.c, cleanups Patchwork
2025-02-07 12:43 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2025-02-07 12:44 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2025-02-07 13:01 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-02-07 13:03 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-02-07 13:04 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-02-07 13:40 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-02-07 20:09 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87frkm3sno.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox