Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: imre.deak@intel.com
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: Add support for DP UHBR SST DSC
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2025 18:40:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87frkt64uy.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z6I93PkEez_WdgOM@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com>

On Tue, 04 Feb 2025, Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 06:08:34PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> Drop the UHBR limitation from DP SST DSC, and handle SST DSC bandwidth
>> computation for UHBR using intel_dp_mtp_tu_compute_config().
>> 
>> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
>
> With the DPT bpp and bpp_step fixes on the list, this seems to work on a
> DP2.0 dock on (SST) UHBR link/DSC mode.

\o/

Thanks for the review and testing!

>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++------
>>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> index cc6aba353c11..eb8f6806166c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> @@ -1958,15 +1958,37 @@ static int dsc_compute_link_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>>  		for (lane_count = limits->min_lane_count;
>>  		     lane_count <= limits->max_lane_count;
>>  		     lane_count <<= 1) {
>> -			if (!is_bw_sufficient_for_dsc_config(dsc_bpp_x16, link_rate,
>> -							     lane_count, adjusted_mode->clock,
>> -							     pipe_config->output_format,
>> -							     timeslots))
>> -				continue;
>>  
>> +			/*
>> +			 * FIXME: intel_dp_mtp_tu_compute_config() requires
>> +			 * ->lane_count and ->port_clock set before we know
>> +			 * they'll work. If we end up failing altogether,
>> +			 * they'll remain in crtc state. This shouldn't matter,
>> +			 * as we'd then bail out from compute config, but it's
>> +			 * just ugly.
>> +			 */
>>  			pipe_config->lane_count = lane_count;
>>  			pipe_config->port_clock = link_rate;
>>  
>> +			if (drm_dp_is_uhbr_rate(link_rate)) {
>> +				int ret;
>> +
>> +				ret = intel_dp_mtp_tu_compute_config(intel_dp,
>> +								     pipe_config,
>> +								     conn_state,
>> +								     dsc_bpp_x16,
>> +								     dsc_bpp_x16,
>> +								     0, true);
>> +				if (ret)
>> +					continue;
>> +			} else {
>> +				if (!is_bw_sufficient_for_dsc_config(dsc_bpp_x16, link_rate,
>> +								     lane_count, adjusted_mode->clock,
>> +								     pipe_config->output_format,
>> +								     timeslots))
>> +					continue;
>> +			}
>> +
>>  			return 0;
>>  		}
>>  	}
>> @@ -2493,9 +2515,6 @@ intel_dp_compute_config_limits(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>>  	limits->min_rate = intel_dp_min_link_rate(intel_dp);
>>  	limits->max_rate = intel_dp_max_link_rate(intel_dp);
>>  
>> -	/* FIXME 128b/132b SST+DSC support missing */
>> -	if (!is_mst && dsc)
>> -		limits->max_rate = min(limits->max_rate, 810000);
>>  	limits->min_rate = min(limits->min_rate, limits->max_rate);
>>  
>>  	limits->min_lane_count = intel_dp_min_lane_count(intel_dp);
>> -- 
>> 2.39.5
>> 

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-04 16:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-03 16:08 [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: Add support for DP UHBR SST DSC Jani Nikula
2025-02-03 16:15 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for " Patchwork
2025-02-03 16:15 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-02-03 16:16 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-02-03 16:36 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-02-03 16:40 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-02-03 16:42 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-02-03 17:02 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-02-03 18:04 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-02-04 16:18 ` [PATCH] " Imre Deak
2025-02-04 16:40   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2025-02-04 18:02     ` Saarinen, Jani
2025-02-05 13:42       ` Jani Nikula

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87frkt64uy.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox