intel-xe.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe/display: Use a single early init call for display
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 11:35:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h67bzxqb.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241209155142.209657-1-dev@lankhorst.se>

On Mon, 09 Dec 2024, Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se> wrote:
> Instead of 3 different calls, it should be safe to unify to a single
> call now. This makes the init sequence cleaner, and display less
> tangled.

Needs more explanation.

I thought the goal was to *unify* i915 and xe display init/cleanup. This
diverges them more, with actually functionally different things rather
than just slightly different ordering.

BR,
Jani.


>
> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>
> ---
> Rebase
>
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c | 73 +++++++------------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h |  8 +--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c          | 10 +---
>  3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
> index 317fa66adf189..b013a4db11183 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
> @@ -101,19 +101,25 @@ int xe_display_create(struct xe_device *xe)
>  	return drmm_add_action_or_reset(&xe->drm, display_destroy, NULL);
>  }
>  
> -static void xe_display_fini_nommio(struct drm_device *dev, void *dummy)
> +static void xe_display_fini_early(void *arg)
>  {
> -	struct xe_device *xe = to_xe_device(dev);
> +	struct xe_device *xe = arg;
>  	struct intel_display *display = &xe->display;
>  
>  	if (!xe->info.probe_display)
>  		return;
>  
> +	intel_display_driver_remove_nogem(display);
> +	intel_display_driver_remove_noirq(display);
> +	intel_opregion_cleanup(display);
>  	intel_power_domains_cleanup(display);
>  }
>  
> -int xe_display_init_nommio(struct xe_device *xe)
> +int xe_display_init_early(struct xe_device *xe)
>  {
> +	struct intel_display *display = &xe->display;
> +	int err;
> +
>  	if (!xe->info.probe_display)
>  		return 0;
>  
> @@ -123,29 +129,6 @@ int xe_display_init_nommio(struct xe_device *xe)
>  	/* This must be called before any calls to HAS_PCH_* */
>  	intel_detect_pch(xe);
>  
> -	return drmm_add_action_or_reset(&xe->drm, xe_display_fini_nommio, xe);
> -}
> -
> -static void xe_display_fini_noirq(void *arg)
> -{
> -	struct xe_device *xe = arg;
> -	struct intel_display *display = &xe->display;
> -
> -	if (!xe->info.probe_display)
> -		return;
> -
> -	intel_display_driver_remove_noirq(display);
> -	intel_opregion_cleanup(display);
> -}
> -
> -int xe_display_init_noirq(struct xe_device *xe)
> -{
> -	struct intel_display *display = &xe->display;
> -	int err;
> -
> -	if (!xe->info.probe_display)
> -		return 0;
> -
>  	intel_display_driver_early_probe(display);
>  
>  	/* Early display init.. */
> @@ -162,38 +145,20 @@ int xe_display_init_noirq(struct xe_device *xe)
>  	intel_display_device_info_runtime_init(display);
>  
>  	err = intel_display_driver_probe_noirq(display);
> -	if (err) {
> -		intel_opregion_cleanup(display);
> -		return err;
> -	}
> -
> -	return devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev, xe_display_fini_noirq, xe);
> -}
> -
> -static void xe_display_fini_noaccel(void *arg)
> -{
> -	struct xe_device *xe = arg;
> -	struct intel_display *display = &xe->display;
> -
> -	if (!xe->info.probe_display)
> -		return;
> -
> -	intel_display_driver_remove_nogem(display);
> -}
> -
> -int xe_display_init_noaccel(struct xe_device *xe)
> -{
> -	struct intel_display *display = &xe->display;
> -	int err;
> -
> -	if (!xe->info.probe_display)
> -		return 0;
> +	if (err)
> +		goto err_opregion;
>  
>  	err = intel_display_driver_probe_nogem(display);
>  	if (err)
> -		return err;
> +		goto err_noirq;
>  
> -	return devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev, xe_display_fini_noaccel, xe);
> +	return devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev, xe_display_fini_early, xe);
> +err_noirq:
> +	intel_display_driver_remove_noirq(display);
> +	intel_power_domains_cleanup(display);
> +err_opregion:
> +	intel_opregion_cleanup(display);
> +	return err;
>  }
>  
>  int xe_display_init(struct xe_device *xe)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h
> index 233f81a26c255..e2a99624f7064 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h
> @@ -20,9 +20,7 @@ int xe_display_create(struct xe_device *xe);
>  
>  int xe_display_probe(struct xe_device *xe);
>  
> -int xe_display_init_nommio(struct xe_device *xe);
> -int xe_display_init_noirq(struct xe_device *xe);
> -int xe_display_init_noaccel(struct xe_device *xe);
> +int xe_display_init_early(struct xe_device *xe);
>  int xe_display_init(struct xe_device *xe);
>  void xe_display_fini(struct xe_device *xe);
>  
> @@ -54,9 +52,7 @@ static inline int xe_display_create(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
>  
>  static inline int xe_display_probe(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
>  
> -static inline int xe_display_init_nommio(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
> -static inline int xe_display_init_noirq(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
> -static inline int xe_display_init_noaccel(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
> +static inline int xe_display_init_early(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
>  static inline int xe_display_init(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
>  static inline void xe_display_fini(struct xe_device *xe) {}
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> index fbec176ee64ad..c9c0b74c74ddb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> @@ -639,10 +639,6 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
>  		return err;
>  
>  	xe->info.mem_region_mask = 1;
> -	err = xe_display_init_nommio(xe);
> -	if (err)
> -		return err;
> -
>  	err = xe_set_dma_info(xe);
>  	if (err)
>  		return err;
> @@ -697,10 +693,6 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
>  	if (err)
>  		return err;
>  
> -	err = xe_display_init_noirq(xe);
> -	if (err)
> -		return err;
> -
>  	err = probe_has_flat_ccs(xe);
>  	if (err)
>  		goto err;
> @@ -724,7 +716,7 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
>  	 * This is the reason the first allocation needs to be done
>  	 * inside display.
>  	 */
> -	err = xe_display_init_noaccel(xe);
> +	err = xe_display_init_early(xe);
>  	if (err)
>  		goto err;

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2024-12-10  9:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-06 18:59 [PATCH 0/5] drm/xe/display: Rework display init for reducing flickering Maarten Lankhorst
2024-12-06 18:59 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/xe/display: Add intel_plane_initial_vblank_wait Maarten Lankhorst
2024-12-06 18:59 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/xe: Remove double pageflip Maarten Lankhorst
2024-12-06 18:59 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/xe: Move suballocator init to after display init Maarten Lankhorst
2024-12-06 18:59 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/xe: Defer irq init until after xe_display_init_noaccel Maarten Lankhorst
2024-12-09 11:17   ` [PATCH v2] " Maarten Lankhorst
2024-12-06 18:59 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/xe/display: Use a single early init call for display Maarten Lankhorst
2024-12-09 15:51   ` [PATCH] " Maarten Lankhorst
2024-12-10  9:35     ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2024-12-11 18:32       ` Maarten Lankhorst
2024-12-12 14:27         ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-12-06 20:37 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/display: Rework display init for reducing flickering Patchwork
2024-12-06 20:37 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-12-06 20:39 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-12-06 20:57 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-12-06 20:59 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-12-06 21:00 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-12-06 21:24 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-12-07  1:36 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2024-12-09 10:39 ` [PATCH 0/5] " Jani Nikula
2024-12-09 14:33 ` ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for drm/xe/display: Rework display init for reducing flickering. (rev2) Patchwork
2024-12-09 15:56 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/display: Rework display init for reducing flickering. (rev3) Patchwork
2024-12-09 15:56 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-12-09 15:58 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-12-09 16:16 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-12-09 16:18 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-12-09 16:20 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-12-09 16:37 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-12-09 17:32 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87h67bzxqb.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dev@lankhorst.se \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).