From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 446EACE8350 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2024 14:45:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13D6D10E51E; Mon, 30 Sep 2024 14:45:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gabe.freedesktop.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="YE7QkTLS"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.10]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9949910E51E; Mon, 30 Sep 2024 14:45:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1727707541; x=1759243541; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:mime-version; bh=zCFMfgECvvmLSW2Hn+BaeWoB4Tw3BB5KJHZMvi/9ug8=; b=YE7QkTLSdK+nsTwlAewNBS1Hs3G50W9MGMQn+iGNF8PhkTNMQuqUGvde e2T2UJQgLFTPbb+2aw06J3DEnYYhrCAKYgeBFaMK6qUQI33E8AkBmPgYY 2I6w/C5kc6ajpVSye5jdn0/0j3ToQ4PjfEEk2RSmBd9CsmBQs7Lk4kS4c pEotu4iVdXcScPritsobmzkKQsS8uk9BzHAXWY7HwU7Y8Gm7j80GHXQG/ kqcx/p8Et/whTCx69UZM9hsaE6qrri5OCYH+6ca4VeJIpMueZ+SEu75Cs QW3bwNCJduHwPLN/tSk86tFJOqac7DVKVA7+H7kAzzt6QFBCi4i12DqeT g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: GxVjUjyJRcWqzqTV0HngbA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: W3S4ijjUQ6KvNMZDEo/VcQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11211"; a="44261874" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,165,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="44261874" Received: from fmviesa008.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.148]) by orvoesa102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Sep 2024 07:45:23 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: YJOa/q1cQkGXBbMajB95yA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Wd6p1uBZSuCGbrrbejYexw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,165,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="73454295" Received: from sschumil-mobl2.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.246.136]) by fmviesa008-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Sep 2024 07:45:21 -0700 From: Jani Nikula To: Daniel Gomez , Konstantin Ryabitsev Cc: I915-ci-infra@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, patchwork@emeril.freedesktop.org, tools@kernel.org, d+samsung@kruces.com Subject: Re: Incorrect response address when using B4 In-Reply-To: <20240930143309.pwl7dzv537b2q3wk@AALNPWDAGOMEZ1.aal.scsc.local> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo References: <20240930133007.u4vm5qj5urikpmvc@AALNPWDAGOMEZ1.aal.scsc.local> <20240930-sapphire-swift-of-reverence-168e2b@lemur> <20240930141839.3rjfom4c2tca655n@AALNPWDAGOMEZ1.aal.scsc.local> <20240930-rustling-auburn-jaguar-23d200@lemur> <20240930143309.pwl7dzv537b2q3wk@AALNPWDAGOMEZ1.aal.scsc.local> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 17:45:08 +0300 Message-ID: <87h69xw68b.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel Xe graphics driver List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-xe-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-xe" On Mon, 30 Sep 2024, Daniel Gomez wrote: > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 10:20:57AM -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 04:18:39PM GMT, Daniel Gomez wrote: >> > > Was it an automated tool that sent you that message? Normally, email clients >> > > would honour the "Reply-To" field and not use the From: address put in by the >> > > relay. >> > >> > It was a CI Patchwork tool. Response [1] to my patch was sent from "From: >> > Patchwork ". >> > >> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/172735727458.1107233.1757281470637305143@2413ebb6fbb6/ >> > >> > I think that tool is ignoring the "Reply-To" field [2] from the B4 message and >> > using the From field. >> > >> > From: Daniel Gomez via B4 Relay >> > Reply-To: da.gomez@samsung.com >> >> It's no big deal as long as you got the email response in the end. We expect >> this to happen with a lot of automation, which is why any replies to the relay >> address are auto-discarded. > > To clarify, the email response didn't land into my inbox. I realized a response > was sent after checking at lore.kernel.org. Yeah, our patchwork instance tries not to spam everyone, and limits the replies to the submitter + intel-gfx/intel-xe mailing lists, but apparently uses From instead of Reply-To. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel