From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA9DBC54E49 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 11:20:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A42810E6FA; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 11:20:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gabe.freedesktop.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="fZ8Koq38"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.7]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C77ED10F068; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 11:20:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1708946420; x=1740482420; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:mime-version; bh=ebfQqnPQVSD0OLSlfPoVFPLfxXa7rGkBnVgKvxWgKNQ=; b=fZ8Koq38Z7Pc7hpo3zWpcpXQ37ue4ImTrT+VVecqWW3cqMsboXbZps/t 0VaaDeU0YJMLt/YVokx7KWU3lBrRGKUfsCtF1X+Sw3rHdNxxvi2byiPPZ Ei3UDvsvyA9LeqS5PjI6ePuC9OgUcvMl51uUybS80dixlze8P40UQI22i YW1TgSgyCzx55mblScDeVToiTPB2Q+PhuFYQgYsfghBzmWflmVILXo2Tx davhoS9n65p61211kngD4+4nbndbntFnuPz5Qof1S1jhRWJ9d6Le0YwsL K3ljV+c4M6oUL4SmSkiUDr1iIis1b9iGnfW6VQMXkdQiJ9j4SPiA4/B9F Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10995"; a="28649290" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,185,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="28649290" Received: from orviesa001.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.141]) by fmvoesa101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Feb 2024 03:20:19 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,185,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="44117309" Received: from hibeid-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.252.46.254]) by smtpauth.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Feb 2024 03:20:12 -0800 From: Jani Nikula To: Lucas De Marchi , Stephen Rothwell Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Arnd Bergmann , Oded Gabbay , Thomas =?utf-8?Q?Hellstr=C3=B6m?= , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , Dave Airlie , Daniel Vetter , Rodrigo Vivi , Matt Roper , Matthew Brost , Riana Tauro , Daniele Ceraolo Spurio , intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe: skip building debugfs code for CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=n In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo References: <20240213134817.3347574-1-arnd@kernel.org> <877cj88lck.fsf@intel.com> <17209419-093b-4674-8b43-06c92312ef61@app.fastmail.com> <20240221172117.243799cf@canb.auug.org.au> Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 13:20:10 +0200 Message-ID: <87h6hvo4k5.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel Xe graphics driver List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-xe-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-xe" On Wed, 21 Feb 2024, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > Looking at drm-intel and drm-misc, they are using a special > for-linux-next. We may eventually adopt the same workflow, but I will > have to check with other maintainers. The idea is to try to better reflect what's actually going to next. For example, drm-intel-next starts targeting "next next" after about -rc6. But we haven't properly automated the cutoff point, it only kicks in at release. So there's still a window when linux-next sees "next next" stuff that gets dropped. Using drm-xe-next directly makes for a longer window. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel