From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Dnyaneshwar Bhadane <dnyaneshwar.bhadane@intel.com>,
Sai Teja Pottumuttu <sai.teja.pottumuttu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/i915/cx0: Pass crtc_state to intel_c20_compute_hdmi_tmds_pll()
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 14:17:16 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ikthsqbn.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241023153352.144146-2-gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
On Wed, 23 Oct 2024, Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> wrote:
> The variable crtc_state already contains everything that
> intel_c20_compute_hdmi_tmds_pll() needs. Simplify the function's
> signature by passing that struct instead of separate variables.
>
> Suggested-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c
> index f73d576fd99e..996c3c6edd41 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c
> @@ -2142,8 +2142,9 @@ static void intel_c10pll_dump_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> i + 2, hw_state->pll[i + 2], i + 3, hw_state->pll[i + 3]);
> }
>
> -static int intel_c20_compute_hdmi_tmds_pll(u64 pixel_clock, struct intel_c20pll_state *pll_state)
> +static int intel_c20_compute_hdmi_tmds_pll(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> + struct intel_c20pll_state *pll_state = &crtc_state->dpll_hw_state.cx0pll.c20;
> u64 datarate;
> u64 mpll_tx_clk_div;
> u64 vco_freq_shift;
> @@ -2155,10 +2156,10 @@ static int intel_c20_compute_hdmi_tmds_pll(u64 pixel_clock, struct intel_c20pll_
> u8 mpllb_ana_freq_vco;
> u8 mpll_div_multiplier;
>
> - if (pixel_clock < 25175 || pixel_clock > 600000)
> + if (crtc_state->port_clock < 25175 || crtc_state->port_clock > 600000)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - datarate = ((u64)pixel_clock * 1000) * 10;
> + datarate = ((u64)crtc_state->port_clock * 1000) * 10;
> mpll_tx_clk_div = ilog2(div64_u64((u64)CLOCK_9999MHZ, (u64)datarate));
> vco_freq_shift = ilog2(div64_u64((u64)CLOCK_4999MHZ * (u64)256, (u64)datarate));
> vco_freq = (datarate << vco_freq_shift) >> 8;
> @@ -2180,7 +2181,7 @@ static int intel_c20_compute_hdmi_tmds_pll(u64 pixel_clock, struct intel_c20pll_
> else
> mpllb_ana_freq_vco = MPLLB_ANA_FREQ_VCO_0;
>
> - pll_state->clock = pixel_clock;
> + pll_state->clock = crtc_state->port_clock;
> pll_state->tx[0] = 0xbe88;
> pll_state->tx[1] = 0x9800;
> pll_state->tx[2] = 0x0000;
> @@ -2266,8 +2267,7 @@ static int intel_c20pll_calc_state(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>
> /* try computed C20 HDMI tables before using consolidated tables */
> if (intel_crtc_has_type(crtc_state, INTEL_OUTPUT_HDMI)) {
> - if (intel_c20_compute_hdmi_tmds_pll(crtc_state->port_clock,
> - &crtc_state->dpll_hw_state.cx0pll.c20) == 0)
> + if (intel_c20_compute_hdmi_tmds_pll(crtc_state) == 0)
> return 0;
> }
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-24 11:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-23 15:33 [PATCH v2 0/2] drm/i915/xe2lpd: Update C20 HDMI TMDS algorithm to include tx_misc Gustavo Sousa
2024-10-23 15:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/i915/cx0: Pass crtc_state to intel_c20_compute_hdmi_tmds_pll() Gustavo Sousa
2024-10-24 11:17 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2024-10-23 15:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915/xe2lpd: Update C20 algorithm to include tx_misc Gustavo Sousa
2024-10-24 7:01 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/i915/xe2lpd: Update C20 HDMI TMDS algorithm to include tx_misc (rev2) Patchwork
2024-10-24 7:01 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-10-24 7:02 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-10-24 7:14 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-10-24 7:16 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-10-24 7:18 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-10-24 7:50 ` ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-10-24 11:15 ` ✓ CI.FULL: success " Patchwork
2024-10-28 20:05 ` Matt Roper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ikthsqbn.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=dnyaneshwar.bhadane@intel.com \
--cc=gustavo.sousa@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sai.teja.pottumuttu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).