From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
lucas.demarchi@intel.com, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com,
joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com, tursulin@ursulin.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] drm/xe/display: add generic __to_intel_display()
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 16:04:12 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87jzkwxhrn.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87sezkxqko.fsf@intel.com>
On Wed, 17 Apr 2024, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Apr 2024, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 03:26:46PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>> Add generic __to_intel_display() macro that accepts either struct
>>> xe_device * or struct intel_display *. This is to be used for
>>> transitional stuff that eventually needs to be converted to use struct
>>> intel_display *, and therefore is not part of to_intel_display().
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_drv.h | 11 +++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_drv.h
>>> index 2792a497257e..4448eda8b2a4 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_drv.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_drv.h
>>> @@ -29,6 +29,17 @@
>>> #include "intel_runtime_pm.h"
>>> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>>>
>>> +/*
>>> + * Transitional macro to optionally convert struct xe_device * to struct
>>> + * intel_display *, also accepting the latter.
>>> + */
>>> +#define __to_intel_display(p) \
>>> + _Generic(p, \
>>> + const struct xe_device *: (&((const struct xe_device *)(p))->display), \
>>> + struct xe_device *: (&((struct xe_device *)(p))->display), \
>>> + const struct intel_display *: (p), \
>>> + struct intel_display *: (p))
>>
>> hmmm... I thought that with our make magic we didn't need this.
>> but well, at least more awareness and trying to get rid of the make magic
>> earlier?
>
> It's needed because in i915 I wanted to put this in i915_drv.h to not
> create a extra dependency to/from i915_drv.h. I tried, it gets tricky.
> So weed another copy xe side.
>
> The make magic does convert all struct drm_i915_private to struct
> xe_device, so this could have struct drm_i915_private, but the other
> copy is not available here.
Okay, so in v4 I decided to shove the macro to a header, and this patch
and the duplication is no longer needed.
BR,
Jani.
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
>>
>>> +
>>> static inline struct drm_i915_private *to_i915(const struct drm_device *dev)
>>> {
>>> return container_of(dev, struct drm_i915_private, drm);
>>> --
>>> 2.39.2
>>>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-17 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-09 12:26 [PATCH v3 0/7] drm/i915: better high level abstraction for display Jani Nikula
2024-04-09 12:26 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] drm/i915/display: add intel_display -> drm_device backpointer Jani Nikula
2024-04-16 16:05 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-09 12:26 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] drm/i915/display: add generic to_intel_display() macro Jani Nikula
2024-04-16 16:06 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-09 12:26 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] drm/i915: add generic __to_intel_display() Jani Nikula
2024-04-16 16:08 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-09 12:26 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] drm/xe/display: " Jani Nikula
2024-04-16 16:10 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-17 9:53 ` Jani Nikula
2024-04-17 13:04 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2024-04-09 12:26 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] drm/i915/display: accept either i915 or display for feature tests Jani Nikula
2024-04-16 16:14 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-17 13:05 ` Jani Nikula
2024-04-09 12:26 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] drm/i915/de: allow intel_display and drm_i915_private for de functions Jani Nikula
2024-04-16 16:16 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-17 13:05 ` Jani Nikula
2024-04-09 12:26 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] drm/i915/quirks: convert struct drm_i915_private to struct intel_display Jani Nikula
2024-04-16 16:17 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-09 12:42 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/i915: better high level abstraction for display (rev2) Patchwork
2024-04-09 12:42 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-04-09 12:43 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-04-09 12:55 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-04-09 12:58 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-04-09 12:59 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-04-09 13:26 ` ✓ CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-04-09 15:26 ` ✓ CI.FULL: " Patchwork
2024-04-16 16:24 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] drm/i915: better high level abstraction for display Rodrigo Vivi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87jzkwxhrn.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=tursulin@ursulin.net \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).