From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe/display: Fix double mutex initialization
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2024 23:28:17 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87msq7bllq.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240405200711.2041428-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
On Fri, 05 Apr 2024, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> wrote:
> All of these mutexes are already initialized by the display side since
> commit 3fef3e6ff86a ("drm/i915: move display mutex inits to display
> code"), so the xe shouldn´t initialize them.
>
> Fixes: 44e694958b95 ("drm/xe/display: Implement display support")
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Yeah, whether they should be initialized with drmm_* is another matter.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c | 5 -----
> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
> index e4db069f0db3..6ec375c1c4b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
> @@ -108,11 +108,6 @@ int xe_display_create(struct xe_device *xe)
> xe->display.hotplug.dp_wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("xe-dp", 0);
>
> drmm_mutex_init(&xe->drm, &xe->sb_lock);
> - drmm_mutex_init(&xe->drm, &xe->display.backlight.lock);
> - drmm_mutex_init(&xe->drm, &xe->display.audio.mutex);
> - drmm_mutex_init(&xe->drm, &xe->display.wm.wm_mutex);
> - drmm_mutex_init(&xe->drm, &xe->display.pps.mutex);
> - drmm_mutex_init(&xe->drm, &xe->display.hdcp.hdcp_mutex);
> xe->enabled_irq_mask = ~0;
>
> err = drmm_add_action_or_reset(&xe->drm, display_destroy, NULL);
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-05 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-05 20:07 [PATCH] drm/xe/display: Fix double mutex initialization Lucas De Marchi
2024-04-05 20:28 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2024-04-05 22:28 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for " Patchwork
2024-04-05 22:28 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-04-05 22:29 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-04-05 22:40 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-04-05 22:43 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-04-05 22:44 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-04-05 23:12 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87msq7bllq.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arun.r.murthy@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox