From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Zhanjun Dong <zhanjun.dong@intel.com>, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/xe/guc: Expose dss per group for GuC error capture
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 10:26:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mst4qsbp.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240116231600.154097-3-zhanjun.dong@intel.com>
On Tue, 16 Jan 2024, Zhanjun Dong <zhanjun.dong@intel.com> wrote:
> Expose helper for dss per group of mcr, GuC error capture feature
> need this info to prepare buffer required.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhanjun Dong <zhanjun.dong@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_mcr.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_mcr.h | 3 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_topology.c | 3 ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine_types.h | 3 +++
> 5 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_mcr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_mcr.c
> index 77925b35cf8d..5874eb71cbc1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_mcr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_mcr.c
> @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ static void init_steering_dss(struct xe_gt *gt)
> {
> unsigned int dss = min(xe_dss_mask_group_ffs(gt->fuse_topo.g_dss_mask, 0, 0),
> xe_dss_mask_group_ffs(gt->fuse_topo.c_dss_mask, 0, 0));
> - unsigned int dss_per_grp = gt_to_xe(gt)->info.platform == XE_PVC ? 8 : 4;
> + unsigned int dss_per_grp = XE_GT_MCR_DSS_PER_GROUP(gt);
>
> gt->steering[DSS].group_target = dss / dss_per_grp;
> gt->steering[DSS].instance_target = dss % dss_per_grp;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_mcr.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_mcr.h
> index 27ca1bc880a0..fa879bf5c271 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_mcr.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_mcr.h
> @@ -7,10 +7,13 @@
> #define _XE_GT_MCR_H_
>
> #include "regs/xe_reg_defs.h"
> +#include "xe_gt_types.h"
>
> struct drm_printer;
> struct xe_gt;
>
> +#define XE_GT_MCR_DSS_PER_GROUP(gt) (gt_to_xe(gt)->info.platform == XE_PVC ? 8 : 4);
> +
> void xe_gt_mcr_init(struct xe_gt *gt);
>
> void xe_gt_mcr_set_implicit_defaults(struct xe_gt *gt);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_topology.c
> index a8d7f272c30a..e973eeaac7f1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_topology.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_topology.c
> @@ -11,9 +11,6 @@
> #include "xe_gt.h"
> #include "xe_mmio.h"
>
> -#define XE_MAX_DSS_FUSE_BITS (32 * XE_MAX_DSS_FUSE_REGS)
> -#define XE_MAX_EU_FUSE_BITS (32 * XE_MAX_EU_FUSE_REGS)
> -
> static void
> load_dss_mask(struct xe_gt *gt, xe_dss_mask_t mask, int numregs, ...)
> {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c
> index 0870bfd1b88d..09a61894cf6f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c
> @@ -93,6 +93,33 @@
> { SFC_DONE(2), 0, 0, "SFC_DONE[2]" }, \
> { SFC_DONE(3), 0, 0, "SFC_DONE[3]" }
>
> +static inline void xe_gt_mcr_get_ss_steering(struct xe_gt *gt, unsigned int dss,
> + unsigned int *group, unsigned int *instance)
> +{
> + int dss_per_grp = XE_GT_MCR_DSS_PER_GROUP(gt);
> + *group = dss / dss_per_grp;
> + *instance = dss % dss_per_grp;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool xe_sseu_has_subslice(struct xe_gt *gt, int slice, int subslice)
> +{
> + int dss_per_grp = XE_GT_MCR_DSS_PER_GROUP(gt);
> + int index = slice * dss_per_grp + subslice;
> + return index >= XE_MAX_DSS_FUSE_BITS ? false : test_bit(index, gt->fuse_topo.g_dss_mask);
> +}
Generally speaking, you're better off dropping the inline keyword in C
files, and just letting the compiler do its job. In fact, having the
inline prevents the compiler from telling you if the functions are
unused.
> +
> +#define _HAS_SS(ss_, gt_, group_, instance_) xe_sseu_has_subslice(gt_, group_, instance_)
> +
> +/*
> + * Loop over each subslice/DSS and determine the group and instance IDs that
> + * should be used to steer MCR accesses toward this DSS.
> + */
> +#define for_each_ss_steering(ss_, gt_, group_, instance_) \
> + for (ss_ = 0, xe_gt_mcr_get_ss_steering(gt_, 0, &group_, &instance_); \
> + ss_ < XE_MAX_DSS_FUSE_BITS; \
> + ss_++, xe_gt_mcr_get_ss_steering(gt_, ss_, &group_, &instance_)) \
> + for_each_if(_HAS_SS(ss_, gt_, group_, instance_))
> +
> int xe_guc_capture_init(struct xe_guc *guc)
> {
> return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine_types.h
> index dfeaaac08b7f..c258228b244f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine_types.h
> @@ -65,6 +65,9 @@ struct xe_bo;
> struct xe_execlist_port;
> struct xe_gt;
>
> +#define XE_MAX_DSS_FUSE_BITS (32 * XE_MAX_DSS_FUSE_REGS)
> +#define XE_MAX_EU_FUSE_BITS (32 * XE_MAX_EU_FUSE_REGS)
> +
> /**
> * struct xe_hw_engine_class_intf - per hw engine class struct interface
> *
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-17 8:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-16 23:15 [PATCH v2] drm/xe/guc: Add GuC based register capture for error capture Zhanjun Dong
2024-01-16 23:15 ` [PATCH v2] drm/xe/guc: Add register defines for GuC based register capture Zhanjun Dong
2024-01-17 8:23 ` Jani Nikula
2024-01-17 22:15 ` Dong, Zhanjun
2024-01-16 23:15 ` [PATCH v2] drm/xe/guc: Expose dss per group for GuC error capture Zhanjun Dong
2024-01-17 8:26 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2024-01-16 23:15 ` [PATCH v2] drm/xe/guc: Update GuC ADS size for " Zhanjun Dong
2024-01-16 23:15 ` [PATCH v2] drm/xe/guc: Add XE_LP steered register lists Zhanjun Dong
2024-01-16 23:15 ` [PATCH v2] drm/xe/guc: Add capture size check in GuC log buffer Zhanjun Dong
2024-01-16 23:15 ` [PATCH v2] drm/xe/guc: Check sizing of guc_capture output Zhanjun Dong
2024-01-16 23:15 ` [PATCH v2] drm/xe/guc: Extract GuC error capture lists on G2H notification Zhanjun Dong
2024-01-16 23:15 ` [PATCH v2] drm/xe/guc: Pre-allocate output nodes for extraction Zhanjun Dong
2024-01-16 23:16 ` [PATCH v2] drm/xe/guc: Plumb GuC-capture into dev coredump Zhanjun Dong
2024-01-16 23:19 ` ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for drm/xe/guc: Extract GuC error capture lists on G2H notification Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mst4qsbp.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=zhanjun.dong@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox