From: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
To: "Lin, Shuicheng" <shuicheng.lin@intel.com>,
"intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] drm/xe/hdcp: Add NULL check for media_gt in intel_hdcp_gsc_check_status()
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2026 10:56:16 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o6l5m2yn.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM4PR11MB54568FCCFAA9BBED0EDC4C10EA7EA@DM4PR11MB5456.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
"Lin, Shuicheng" <shuicheng.lin@intel.com> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2026 10:19 AM Gustavo Sousa wrote:
>> When media GT is disabled via configfs, there is no allocation for media_gt,
>> which is kept as NULL. In such scenario,
>> intel_hdcp_gsc_check_status() results in a kernel pagefault error due to >-
>> >uc.gsc being evaluated as an invalid memory address.
>>
>> Fix that by introducing a NULL check on media_gt and bailing out early if so.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_hdcp_gsc.c | 6 ++++++
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_hdcp_gsc.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_hdcp_gsc.c
>> index 29c72aa4b0d2..1cac00c17d4c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_hdcp_gsc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_hdcp_gsc.c
>> @@ -39,6 +39,12 @@ static bool intel_hdcp_gsc_check_status(struct
>> drm_device *drm)
>> struct xe_gt *gt = tile->media_gt;
>> struct xe_gsc *gsc = >->uc.gsc;
>
> If gt is NULL, this ">->uc.gsc" is already undefined behavior.
I don't think so. It just turns out that the offset will be invalid. We are not
dereferencing the gt pointer here.
> I would prefer to move this assignment to after below check.
I think that might be unecessary. Would you agree with keeping it as-is
based on my argument above?
>
>>
>> + if (!gt) {
>> + drm_dbg_kms(&xe->drm,
>> + "not checking GSC status for HDCP2.x: media GT not
>> present or disabled\n");
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> +
>> if (!gsc || !xe_uc_fw_is_available(&gsc->fw)) {
>
> BTW, if gt is not NULL, then gsc cannot be NULL. So this "!gsc" check
> could be dropped.
Yep. Makes sense.
--
Gustavo Sousa
>
> Shuicheng
>
>> drm_dbg_kms(&xe->drm,
>> "GSC Components not ready for HDCP2.x\n");
>>
>> ---
>> base-commit: 40e52ed6c66cef091579dd7fe49ccd2de135f5c5
>> change-id: 20260302-check-for-null-media_gt-in-
>> intel_hdcp_gsc_check_status-071898b8a402
>>
>> Best regards,
>> --
>> Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-03 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-02 18:18 [PATCH] drm/xe/hdcp: Add NULL check for media_gt in intel_hdcp_gsc_check_status() Gustavo Sousa
2026-03-02 23:07 ` Lin, Shuicheng
2026-03-03 13:56 ` Gustavo Sousa [this message]
2026-03-03 16:53 ` Lin, Shuicheng
2026-03-11 22:09 ` Gustavo Sousa
2026-03-24 8:03 ` Bhadane, Dnyaneshwar
2026-03-03 0:37 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for " Patchwork
2026-03-03 1:12 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-03-03 9:32 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o6l5m2yn.fsf@intel.com \
--to=gustavo.sousa@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=shuicheng.lin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox