From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] drm/i915: Nuke intel_plane_ggtt_offset()
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2025 11:29:04 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o6xd1wdr.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250402172240.9275-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, 02 Apr 2025, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> We don't really need the extra intel_plane_ggtt_offset() wrapper
> anymore. Get rid of it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c | 5 -----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.h | 2 --
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb_pin.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_fb_pin.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_plane_initial.c | 2 +-
> 6 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c
> index 7276179df878..264a50b29c16 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c
> @@ -1565,8 +1565,3 @@ int intel_atomic_check_planes(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
>
> return 0;
> }
> -
> -u32 intel_plane_ggtt_offset(const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state)
> -{
> - return i915_ggtt_offset(plane_state->ggtt_vma);
> -}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.h
> index 6efac923dcbc..65edd88d28a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.h
> @@ -88,6 +88,4 @@ int intel_atomic_add_affected_planes(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> struct intel_crtc *crtc);
> int intel_atomic_check_planes(struct intel_atomic_state *state);
>
> -u32 intel_plane_ggtt_offset(const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state);
> -
> #endif /* __INTEL_ATOMIC_PLANE_H__ */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb_pin.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb_pin.c
> index fb7d0c8b9302..f2d8675dd98a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb_pin.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb_pin.c
> @@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ int intel_plane_pin_fb(struct intel_plane_state *plane_state,
> plane_state->surf = i915_gem_object_get_dma_address(obj, 0) +
> plane->surf_offset(plane_state);
> } else {
> - plane_state->surf = intel_plane_ggtt_offset(plane_state) +
> + plane_state->surf = i915_ggtt_offset(plane_state->ggtt_vma) +
> plane->surf_offset(plane_state);
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c
> index 1c49610eb42f..3afff528a7bd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c
> @@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ intel_find_initial_plane_obj(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> i915_vma_pin_fence(vma) == 0 && vma->fence)
> plane_state->flags |= PLANE_HAS_FENCE;
>
> - plane_state->surf = intel_plane_ggtt_offset(plane_state);
> + plane_state->surf = i915_ggtt_offset(plane_state->ggtt_vma);
>
> plane_state->uapi.src_x = 0;
> plane_state->uapi.src_y = 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_fb_pin.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_fb_pin.c
> index b9c45a5a3d82..b2e979805455 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_fb_pin.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_fb_pin.c
> @@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ int intel_plane_pin_fb(struct intel_plane_state *new_plane_state,
>
> new_plane_state->ggtt_vma = vma;
>
> - new_plane_state->surf = intel_plane_ggtt_offset(new_plane_state) +
> + new_plane_state->surf = i915_ggtt_offset(new_plane_state->ggtt_vma) +
> plane->surf_offset(new_plane_state);
I don't think xe specific code should be calling i915 compat functions
directly.
>
> return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_plane_initial.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_plane_initial.c
> index a15f60835239..c563edf14b1a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_plane_initial.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_plane_initial.c
> @@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ intel_find_initial_plane_obj(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>
> plane_state->ggtt_vma = vma;
>
> - plane_state->surf = intel_plane_ggtt_offset(plane_state);
> + plane_state->surf = i915_ggtt_offset(plane_state->ggtt_vma);
Ditto.
>
> plane_state->uapi.src_x = 0;
> plane_state->uapi.src_y = 0;
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-03 8:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-02 17:22 [PATCH v2 0/6] drm/i915: Precompute plane SURF address/etc Ville Syrjala
2025-04-02 17:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] drm/i915: Precompute plane SURF address Ville Syrjala
2025-04-10 8:45 ` Jani Nikula
2025-04-02 17:22 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] drm/i915: Nuke intel_plane_ggtt_offset() Ville Syrjala
2025-04-03 8:29 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2025-04-04 15:21 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-04-10 8:47 ` Jani Nikula
2025-04-02 17:22 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] drm/i915: Move the intel_dpt_offset() check into intel_plane_pin_fb() Ville Syrjala
2025-04-10 8:51 ` Jani Nikula
2025-04-02 17:22 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] drm/i915: Use i915_vma_offset() in intel_dpt_offset() Ville Syrjala
2025-04-10 8:52 ` Jani Nikula
2025-04-02 17:22 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] drm/i915: Remove unused dpt_total_entries() Ville Syrjala
2025-04-10 8:52 ` Jani Nikula
2025-04-02 17:22 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] drm/i915: Don't pass crtc_state to foo_plane_ctl() & co Ville Syrjala
2025-04-10 8:53 ` Jani Nikula
2025-04-02 17:28 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/i915: Precompute plane SURF address/etc. (rev2) Patchwork
2025-04-02 17:29 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2025-04-02 17:30 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2025-04-02 17:47 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-04-02 17:50 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-04-02 17:51 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-04-02 18:36 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2025-04-02 21:01 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o6xd1wdr.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).