From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Aravind Iddamsetty <aravind.iddamsetty@linux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com,
lucas.demarchi@intel.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] drm: add devm release action
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 08:47:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87plvom684.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <59514a7a-fbf7-45fa-b205-b4e1ffd019ac@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, 21 Mar 2024, Aravind Iddamsetty <aravind.iddamsetty@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On 21/03/24 02:23, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 04:14:25PM +0530, Aravind Iddamsetty wrote:
>>> In scenarios where drm_dev_put is directly called by driver we want to
>>> release devm_drm_dev_init_release action associated with struct
>>> drm_device.
>>>
>>> Cc: Thomas Hellstr_m <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Aravind Iddamsetty <aravind.iddamsetty@linux.intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 6 ++++++
>>> include/drm/drm_drv.h | 4 ++++
>>> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
>>> index 243cacb3575c..b23c5081812b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
>>> @@ -714,6 +714,12 @@ static int devm_drm_dev_init(struct device *parent,
>>> devm_drm_dev_init_release, dev);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +void __devm_drm_dev_release_action(struct drm_device *dev)
>>> +{
>>> + devm_release_action(dev->dev, devm_drm_dev_init_release, dev);
>>> +}
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__devm_drm_dev_release_action);
>>> +
>>> void *__devm_drm_dev_alloc(struct device *parent,
>>> const struct drm_driver *driver,
>>> size_t size, size_t offset)
>>> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_drv.h b/include/drm/drm_drv.h
>>> index 8878260d7529..a1d12cb72088 100644
>>> --- a/include/drm/drm_drv.h
>>> +++ b/include/drm/drm_drv.h
>>> @@ -444,6 +444,8 @@ struct drm_driver {
>>> const struct file_operations *fops;
>>> };
>>>
>>> +void __devm_drm_dev_release_action(struct drm_device *dev);
>>> +
>>> void *__devm_drm_dev_alloc(struct device *parent,
>>> const struct drm_driver *driver,
>>> size_t size, size_t offset);
>>> @@ -477,6 +479,8 @@ void *__devm_drm_dev_alloc(struct device *parent,
>>> #define devm_drm_dev_alloc(parent, driver, type, member) \
>>> ((type *) __devm_drm_dev_alloc(parent, driver, sizeof(type), \
>>> offsetof(type, member)))
>>> +#define devm_drm_release_action(drm_dev) \
>>> + __devm_drm_dev_release_action(drm_dev)
>> why not simply renaming the original function?
>
> didn't get you which function are you referring to?
Why add a function with double-underscores, and then wrap it in a macro
without the underscores?
devm_drm_dev_alloc() is that way only because it needs sizeof and
offsetof on the arguments, not to set a general example.
BR,
Jani.
>
> Thanks,
> Aravind.
>>
>>>
>>> struct drm_device *drm_dev_alloc(const struct drm_driver *driver,
>>> struct device *parent);
>>> --
>>> 2.25.1
>>>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-21 6:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-20 10:44 [RFC 0/2] drm/xe: Support PCIe FLR Aravind Iddamsetty
2024-03-20 10:44 ` [RFC 1/2] drm: add devm release action Aravind Iddamsetty
2024-03-20 20:53 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-03-21 6:08 ` Aravind Iddamsetty
2024-03-21 6:47 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2024-03-21 7:21 ` Aravind Iddamsetty
2024-03-20 10:44 ` [RFC 2/2] drm/xe/FLR: Support PCIe FLR Aravind Iddamsetty
2024-03-20 20:52 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-03-21 10:45 ` Aravind Iddamsetty
2024-03-20 23:01 ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-03-21 11:38 ` Aravind Iddamsetty
2024-03-20 11:10 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: " Patchwork
2024-03-20 11:10 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-03-20 11:11 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-03-20 11:22 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-03-20 11:24 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-03-20 11:26 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-03-20 11:52 ` ✓ CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-03-20 22:25 ` [RFC 0/2] " Lucas De Marchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87plvom684.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=aravind.iddamsetty@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox