From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe: Fix global-out-of-bounds in rule_matches
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2024 15:05:43 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v81o80dk.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y16k80eb.fsf@intel.com>
On Tue, 02 Jul 2024, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Jul 2024, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 05:37:02PM GMT, Nirmoy Das wrote:
>>>Do post-increment instead of pre-increment to fix:
>>>[ 9344.404516] BUG: KASAN: global-out-of-bounds in rule_matches+0xb72/0x11c0 [xe]
>>>[ 9344.411887] Read of size 1 at addr ffffffffa330b210 by task xe_module_load/248463
>>>
>>>Fixes: dc72c52a42e0 ("drm/xe/rtp: Allow to OR rules")
>>>Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
>>>Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
>>>---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_rtp.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_rtp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_rtp.c
>>>index 5b27f7c45ea3..f6ec8df5fc94 100644
>>>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_rtp.c
>>>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_rtp.c
>>>@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static bool rule_matches(const struct xe_device *xe,
>>> * Advance rules until we find XE_RTP_MATCH_OR to check
>>> * if there's another set of conditions to check
>>> */
>>>- while (i < n_rules && rules[++i].match_type != XE_RTP_MATCH_OR)
>>>+ while (i < n_rules && rules[i++].match_type != XE_RTP_MATCH_OR)
>>
>> this will double check the current iteration. A better fix was posted last
>> week and I will merge it soon:
>
> Meh, any messing with loop variables inside a for loop is a footgun. You
> need a better abstraction. :p
>
> Even the for loop is just too clever for its own good:
>
> for (r = rules, i = 0; i < n_rules; r = &rules[++i]) {
>
> This should just be:
>
> for (i = 0; i < n_rules; i++) {
> r = rules[i];
r = &rules[i];
obvs
>
> Don't make it so hard for your future self. ;)
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>>
>> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/135527/
>>
>> Lucas De Marchi
>>
>>> ;
>>>
>>> if (i >= n_rules)
>>>--
>>>2.42.0
>>>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-02 12:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-01 15:37 [PATCH] drm/xe: Fix global-out-of-bounds in rule_matches Nirmoy Das
2024-07-01 15:56 ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-07-01 16:01 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-07-02 12:05 ` Jani Nikula
2024-07-02 12:05 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2024-07-01 19:38 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for " Patchwork
2024-07-01 19:38 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-07-01 19:39 ` ✗ CI.KUnit: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87v81o80dk.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox