From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/display: move dmc_firmware_path to display params
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 10:48:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v85elkic.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <64loxwpkjgu2nf4up554hfuqd6oi2quguozom2p2gowem26rbj@rszc3ubdda6u>
On Thu, 21 Mar 2024, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 06:20:57PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>On Thu, 21 Mar 2024, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> wrote:
>>> The dmc_firmware_path parameter is clearly a display parameter. Move it
>>> there. This also cleans up the ugly member in struct xe_device.
>>
>>Hmm, does this actually fix the parameter on xe?!
>
> not sure what you meant here. Patches makes sense to me.
Unless I'm mistaken, the parameter currently does not work on xe at
all. I only realized after posting the patch that this probably fixes
that issue too.
BR,
Jani.
>
> Lucas De Marchi
>
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_params.c | 3 +++
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_params.h | 1 +
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c | 8 ++++----
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c | 3 ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h | 1 -
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h | 3 ---
>>> 6 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_params.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_params.c
>>> index 11e03cfb774d..c8e3d6892e23 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_params.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_params.c
>>> @@ -27,6 +27,9 @@ static struct intel_display_params intel_display_modparams __read_mostly = {
>>> * debugfs mode to 0.
>>> */
>>>
>>> +intel_display_param_named_unsafe(dmc_firmware_path, charp, 0400,
>>> + "DMC firmware path to use instead of the default one");
>>> +
>>> intel_display_param_named_unsafe(vbt_firmware, charp, 0400,
>>> "Load VBT from specified file under /lib/firmware");
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_params.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_params.h
>>> index 6206cc51df04..f95a6f79904f 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_params.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_params.h
>>> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ struct drm_i915_private;
>>> * debugfs file
>>> */
>>> #define INTEL_DISPLAY_PARAMS_FOR_EACH(param) \
>>> + param(char *, dmc_firmware_path, NULL, 0400) \
>>> param(char *, vbt_firmware, NULL, 0400) \
>>> param(int, lvds_channel_mode, 0, 0400) \
>>> param(int, panel_use_ssc, -1, 0600) \
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
>>> index 3fa851b5c7a6..b4e730882ce2 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
>>> @@ -927,7 +927,7 @@ static void dmc_load_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
>>>
>>> err = request_firmware(&fw, dmc->fw_path, i915->drm.dev);
>>>
>>> - if (err == -ENOENT && !i915->params.dmc_firmware_path) {
>>> + if (err == -ENOENT && !i915->display.params.dmc_firmware_path) {
>>> fallback_path = dmc_fallback_path(i915);
>>> if (fallback_path) {
>>> drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "%s not found, falling back to %s\n",
>>> @@ -1034,14 +1034,14 @@ void intel_dmc_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>>> dmc->max_fw_size = BXT_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - if (i915->params.dmc_firmware_path) {
>>> - if (strlen(i915->params.dmc_firmware_path) == 0) {
>>> + if (i915->display.params.dmc_firmware_path) {
>>> + if (strlen(i915->display.params.dmc_firmware_path) == 0) {
>>> drm_info(&i915->drm,
>>> "Disabling DMC firmware and runtime PM\n");
>>> goto out;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - dmc->fw_path = i915->params.dmc_firmware_path;
>>> + dmc->fw_path = i915->display.params.dmc_firmware_path;
>>> }
>>>
>>> if (!dmc->fw_path) {
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
>>> index de43048543e8..8c00169e3ab7 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
>>> @@ -108,9 +108,6 @@ i915_param_named_unsafe(guc_firmware_path, charp, 0400,
>>> i915_param_named_unsafe(huc_firmware_path, charp, 0400,
>>> "HuC firmware path to use instead of the default one");
>>>
>>> -i915_param_named_unsafe(dmc_firmware_path, charp, 0400,
>>> - "DMC firmware path to use instead of the default one");
>>> -
>>> i915_param_named_unsafe(gsc_firmware_path, charp, 0400,
>>> "GSC firmware path to use instead of the default one");
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h
>>> index 1315d7fac850..2eb3f2115ff2 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h
>>> @@ -51,7 +51,6 @@ struct drm_printer;
>>> param(int, guc_log_level, -1, 0400) \
>>> param(char *, guc_firmware_path, NULL, 0400) \
>>> param(char *, huc_firmware_path, NULL, 0400) \
>>> - param(char *, dmc_firmware_path, NULL, 0400) \
>>> param(char *, gsc_firmware_path, NULL, 0400) \
>>> param(bool, memtest, false, 0400) \
>>> param(int, mmio_debug, -IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG_MMIO), 0600) \
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
>>> index 9785eef2e5a4..eeab2002d6db 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
>>> @@ -524,9 +524,6 @@ struct xe_device {
>>> unsigned int fsb_freq, mem_freq, is_ddr3;
>>> u8 vblank_enabled;
>>> };
>>> - struct {
>>> - const char *dmc_firmware_path;
>>> - } params;
>>>
>>> void *pxp;
>>> #endif
>>
>>--
>>Jani Nikula, Intel
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-22 8:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-21 16:18 [PATCH] drm/i915/display: move dmc_firmware_path to display params Jani Nikula
2024-03-21 16:20 ` Jani Nikula
2024-03-22 4:34 ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-03-22 8:48 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2024-03-22 16:06 ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-03-22 18:32 ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-04-02 8:47 ` Jani Nikula
2024-03-21 19:35 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for " Patchwork
2024-03-21 19:35 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-03-21 19:36 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-03-21 19:47 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-03-21 19:49 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-03-21 19:51 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-03-21 20:14 ` ✓ CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87v85elkic.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox