From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/plane: convert intel_atomic_plane.[ch] to struct intel_display
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 16:37:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wmda16ft.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250228142539.3216960-2-jani.nikula@intel.com>
On Fri, 28 Feb 2025, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> wrote:
> Going forward, struct intel_display is the main display device data
> pointer. Convert intel_atomic_plane.[ch] to struct intel_display.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c | 79 +++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c
> index 181ad7468d85..4f1ad57ca5ed 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c
> @@ -42,7 +42,6 @@
>
> #include "gem/i915_gem_object.h"
> #include "i915_config.h"
> -#include "i915_drv.h"
> #include "i915_scheduler_types.h"
> #include "i9xx_plane_regs.h"
> #include "intel_atomic_plane.h"
> @@ -57,6 +56,7 @@
> #include "skl_universal_plane.h"
> #include "skl_watermark.h"
>
> +
Hrmh, it annoys me when other people do this, but it annoys me even more
when I do it. *facepalm*.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-28 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-28 14:25 [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe/compat: refactor compat i915_drv.h Jani Nikula
2025-02-28 14:25 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/plane: convert intel_atomic_plane.[ch] to struct intel_display Jani Nikula
2025-02-28 14:37 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2025-02-28 15:34 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/xe/compat: refactor compat i915_drv.h Patchwork
2025-02-28 15:36 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-02-28 15:38 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-02-28 15:54 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-02-28 16:18 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-02-28 19:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] " kernel test robot
2025-02-28 23:15 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure for series starting with [1/2] " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wmda16ft.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox