From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>,
Chaitanya Kumar Borah <chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/hdcp: Add the loop only for DP encoders
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 12:31:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wmhpnap0.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241030025304.317977-1-suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024, Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> wrote:
> Add the loop on the first read/write we do to give docks and dp encoders
> some extra time to get their HDCP DPCD registers ready only for
> DP/DPMST encoders as this issue is only observed here no need to burden
> other encoders with extra retries as this causes the HDMI connector to
> have some other timing issue and fails HDCP authentication.
>
> --v2
> -Add intent of patch [Chaitanya]
> -Add reasoning for loop [Jani]
What I really meant was, the subject and the commit message talk about
"the loop" as if it's the one and only loop in all of HDCP.
Imagine having to write a changelog for all the changes in a pull
request [1]. Imagine you don't know anything about the details in the
commits.
First, you look at the commit subject. Huh, what loop? Then you look at
the commit message. Huh, what? The commit message is a single five-line
sentence. It's really really hard to understand what it's trying to
say. What's being done? Especially why? What's the user impact? I'd have
to look at the code to understand, and that's not a great sign for the
commit message. If it's a fix, is there a bug report that I could look
at to help me understand, etc.
BR,
Jani.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/878quu6go9.fsf@intel.com
> -Make sure we forfiet the 50ms wait for non DP/DPMST encoders.
>
> Fixes: 9d5a05f86d2f ("drm/i915/hdcp: Retry first read and writes to downstream")
> Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kumar Borah <chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c | 36 +++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> index ed6aa87403e2..c8ba69c51cce 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> @@ -1503,6 +1503,8 @@ static int hdcp2_deauthenticate_port(struct intel_connector *connector)
> static int hdcp2_authentication_key_exchange(struct intel_connector *connector)
> {
> struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(connector);
> + struct intel_digital_port *dig_port =
> + intel_attached_dig_port(connector);
> struct intel_hdcp *hdcp = &connector->hdcp;
> union {
> struct hdcp2_ake_init ake_init;
> @@ -1513,31 +1515,39 @@ static int hdcp2_authentication_key_exchange(struct intel_connector *connector)
> } msgs;
> const struct intel_hdcp_shim *shim = hdcp->shim;
> size_t size;
> - int ret, i;
> + bool is_dp_encoder;
> + int ret, i, max_retries;
>
> /* Init for seq_num */
> hdcp->seq_num_v = 0;
> hdcp->seq_num_m = 0;
>
> + is_dp_encoder = intel_encoder_is_dp(&dig_port->base) ||
> + intel_encoder_is_mst(&dig_port->base);
> + if (is_dp_encoder)
> + max_retries = 10;
> + else
> + max_retries = 1;
> +
> ret = hdcp2_prepare_ake_init(connector, &msgs.ake_init);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
> /*
> * Retry the first read and write to downstream at least 10 times
> - * with a 50ms delay if not hdcp2 capable(dock decides to stop advertising
> - * hdcp2 capability for some reason). The reason being that
> - * during suspend resume dock usually keeps the HDCP2 registers inaccesible
> - * causing AUX error. This wouldn't be a big problem if the userspace
> - * just kept retrying with some delay while it continues to play low
> - * value content but most userpace applications end up throwing an error
> - * when it receives one from KMD. This makes sure we give the dock
> - * and the sink devices to complete its power cycle and then try HDCP
> - * authentication. The values of 10 and delay of 50ms was decided based
> - * on multiple trial and errors.
> + * with a 50ms delay if not hdcp2 capable for DP/DPMST encoders
> + * (dock decides to stop advertising hdcp2 capability for some reason).
> + * The reason being that during suspend resume dock usually keeps the
> + * HDCP2 registers inaccesible causing AUX error. This wouldn't be a
> + * big problem if the userspace just kept retrying with some delay while
> + * it continues to play low value content but most userpace applications
> + * end up throwing an error when it receives one from KMD. This makes
> + * sure we give the dock and the sink devices to complete its power cycle
> + * and then try HDCP authentication. The values of 10 and delay of 50ms
> + * was decided based on multiple trial and errors.
> */
> - for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
> - if (!intel_hdcp2_get_capability(connector)) {
> + for (i = 0; i < max_retries; i++) {
> + if (!intel_hdcp2_get_capability(connector) && is_dp_encoder) {
> msleep(50);
> continue;
> }
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-30 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-30 2:53 [PATCH] drm/i915/hdcp: Add the loop only for DP encoders Suraj Kandpal
2024-10-30 2:58 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/i915/hdcp: Add the loop only for DP encoders (rev2) Patchwork
2024-10-30 2:58 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-10-30 3:00 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-10-30 3:12 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-10-30 3:14 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-10-30 3:15 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-10-30 3:41 ` ✓ CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-10-30 4:49 ` [PATCH] drm/i915/hdcp: Add the loop only for DP encoders Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2024-10-30 10:21 ` Jani Nikula
2024-10-30 10:28 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-10-30 10:28 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-10-30 7:13 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure for drm/i915/hdcp: Add the loop only for DP encoders (rev2) Patchwork
2024-10-30 10:31 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-10-29 8:53 [PATCH] drm/i915/hdcp: Add the loop only for DP encoders Suraj Kandpal
2024-10-29 10:47 ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2024-10-29 10:54 ` Jani Nikula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wmhpnap0.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).