Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
To: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe: Don't fall through on DRM_GPUVA_OP_DRIVER in op_check_svm_userptr
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 16:19:25 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y0ffhvs2.fsf@mkuoppal-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <74396ae4-3503-466a-8c3e-02bc56a55628@intel.com>

Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> On 10/07/2026 15:12, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
>> The DRM_GPUVA_OP_DRIVER operation is used by eudebug (and potentially
>> other driver ops). Because the break was inside the #if GPUSVM block,
>> we fell through and printed the "NOT POSSIBLE" warning.
>
> I think throwing a warn with "NOT POSSIBLE" was maybe not the wrong 
> thing wrt SVM and the current driver code, in the sense that there would 
> be a bug somewhere if we reach here without GPUSVM support?
>
> Are you triggering this only with upcoming eudebug? i.e there is a new 
> DRM_GPUVA_OP_DRIVER user, which is not SVM?

Yes, thats the case.

>
>> 
>> Fixes: 7477c4bd20dc ("drm/xe/pt: unify xe_pt_svm_pre_commit with userptr")
>
> I think maybe drop the fixes, and tweak the commit to make it clear that 
> this is just prep work for a new user?

Will drop. This is not triggerable without an another OP_DRIVER (which
eudebug introduces)

-Mika

>
>> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c | 4 ++--
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
>> index 7111b5d0f6aa..f5ce1fcf484c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
>> @@ -1547,8 +1547,8 @@ static int op_check_svm_userptr(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_vma_op *op,
>>   			err = vma_check_userptr(vm, gpuva_to_vma(op->base.prefetch.va), pt_update);
>>   		}
>>   		break;
>> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_GPUSVM)
>>   	case DRM_GPUVA_OP_DRIVER:
>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_GPUSVM)
>>   		if (op->subop == XE_VMA_SUBOP_MAP_RANGE) {
>>   			struct xe_svm_range *range = op->map_range.range;
>>   
>> @@ -1561,8 +1561,8 @@ static int op_check_svm_userptr(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_vma_op *op,
>>   				return -EAGAIN;
>>   			}
>>   		}
>> -		break;
>>   #endif
>> +		break;
>>   	default:
>>   		drm_warn(&vm->xe->drm, "NOT POSSIBLE");
>>   	}

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-13 13:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-10 14:12 [PATCH] drm/xe: Don't fall through on DRM_GPUVA_OP_DRIVER in op_check_svm_userptr Mika Kuoppala
2026-07-10 14:20 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for " Patchwork
2026-07-10 15:14 ` [PATCH] " Matthew Auld
2026-07-10 15:28   ` Matthew Auld
2026-07-13 13:19   ` Mika Kuoppala [this message]
2026-07-10 15:32 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2026-07-11  1:07 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87y0ffhvs2.fsf@mkuoppal-desk \
    --to=mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox