Re: [PATCH v2] drm/xe: Allow building as kernel built-in

[Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>]

On Fri, 25 Apr 2025, Harry Austen <hpausten@protonmail.com> wrote:
> Fix Kconfig symbol dependency on KUNIT, which isn't actually required
> for XE to be built-in. However, if KUNIT is enabled, it must be built-in
> too.
>
> Also, allow DRM_XE_DISPLAY to be built-in. But only as long as DRM_I915
> isn't, since that results in duplicate symbol errors.
>
> Fixes: 08987a8b6820 ("drm/xe: Fix build with KUNIT=m")
> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Harry Austen <hpausten@protonmail.com>
> ---
> v2: Ensure DRM_XE_DISPLAY and DRM_I915 can't both be built-in
>
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Kconfig | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Kconfig
> index 9bce047901b22..bc63c396d7fef 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Kconfig
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>  # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>  config DRM_XE
>  	tristate "Intel Xe Graphics"
> -	depends on DRM && PCI && MMU && (m || (y && KUNIT=y))
> +	depends on DRM && PCI && MMU && (m || (y && KUNIT!=m))

I can't make heads or tails about that. I think expressing the kunit
dependency on a separate line like this is both much more common and
clear:

	depends on KUNIT || KUNIT=n

>  	select INTERVAL_TREE
>  	# we need shmfs for the swappable backing store, and in particular
>  	# the shmem_readpage() which depends upon tmpfs
> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ config DRM_XE
>  
>  config DRM_XE_DISPLAY
>  	bool "Enable display support"
> -	depends on DRM_XE && DRM_XE=m && HAS_IOPORT
> +	depends on DRM_XE && (DRM_XE=m || DRM_I915!=y) && HAS_IOPORT
>  	select FB_IOMEM_HELPERS if DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION
>  	select I2C
>  	select I2C_ALGOBIT

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel