intel-xe.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: "Borah, Chaitanya Kumar" <chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com>,
	"Kandpal, Suraj" <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>,
	"intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] drm/i915/hdcp: Add the loop only for DP encoders
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 12:21:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zfmlnb5x.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SJ1PR11MB61299120730252D07F24B054B9542@SJ1PR11MB6129.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

On Wed, 30 Oct 2024, "Borah, Chaitanya Kumar" <chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kandpal, Suraj <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2024 8:23 AM
>> To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> Cc: Kandpal, Suraj <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>; Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
>> <chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/hdcp: Add the loop only for DP encoders
>> 
>> Add the loop on the first read/write we do to give docks and dp encoders
>> some extra time to get their HDCP DPCD registers ready only for DP/DPMST
>> encoders as this issue is only observed here no need to burden other
>> encoders with extra retries as this causes the HDMI connector to have some
>> other timing issue and fails HDCP authentication.
>> 
>> --v2
>> -Add intent of patch [Chaitanya]
>> -Add reasoning for loop [Jani]
>> -Make sure we forfiet the 50ms wait for non DP/DPMST encoders.
>> 
>> Fixes: 9d5a05f86d2f ("drm/i915/hdcp: Retry first read and writes to
>> downstream")
>> Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kumar Borah <chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c | 36 +++++++++++++++--------
>>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
>> index ed6aa87403e2..c8ba69c51cce 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
>> @@ -1503,6 +1503,8 @@ static int hdcp2_deauthenticate_port(struct
>> intel_connector *connector)  static int
>> hdcp2_authentication_key_exchange(struct intel_connector *connector)  {
>>  	struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(connector);
>> +	struct intel_digital_port *dig_port =
>> +		intel_attached_dig_port(connector);
>>  	struct intel_hdcp *hdcp = &connector->hdcp;
>>  	union {
>>  		struct hdcp2_ake_init ake_init;
>> @@ -1513,31 +1515,39 @@ static int
>> hdcp2_authentication_key_exchange(struct intel_connector *connector)
>>  	} msgs;
>>  	const struct intel_hdcp_shim *shim = hdcp->shim;
>>  	size_t size;
>> -	int ret, i;
>> +	bool is_dp_encoder;
>> +	int ret, i, max_retries;
>> 
>>  	/* Init for seq_num */
>>  	hdcp->seq_num_v = 0;
>>  	hdcp->seq_num_m = 0;
>> 
>> +	is_dp_encoder =	intel_encoder_is_dp(&dig_port->base) ||
>> +		intel_encoder_is_mst(&dig_port->base);
>> +	if (is_dp_encoder)
>> +		max_retries = 10;
>> +	else
>> +		max_retries = 1;
>> +
>>  	ret = hdcp2_prepare_ake_init(connector, &msgs.ake_init);
>>  	if (ret < 0)
>>  		return ret;
>> 
>>  	/*
>>  	 * Retry the first read and write to downstream at least 10 times
>> -	 * with a 50ms delay if not hdcp2 capable(dock decides to stop
>> advertising
>> -	 * hdcp2 capability for some reason). The reason being that
>> -	 * during suspend resume dock usually keeps the HDCP2 registers
>> inaccesible
>> -	 * causing AUX error. This wouldn't be a big problem if the userspace
>> -	 * just kept retrying with some delay while it continues to play low
>> -	 * value content but most userpace applications end up throwing an
>> error
>> -	 * when it receives one from KMD. This makes sure we give the dock
>> -	 * and the sink devices to complete its power cycle and then try HDCP
>> -	 * authentication. The values of 10 and delay of 50ms was decided
>> based
>> -	 * on multiple trial and errors.
>> +	 * with a 50ms delay if not hdcp2 capable for DP/DPMST encoders
>> +	 * (dock decides to stop advertising hdcp2 capability for some
>> reason).
>> +	 * The reason being that during suspend resume dock usually keeps
>> the
>> +	 * HDCP2 registers inaccesible causing AUX error. This wouldn't be a
>> +	 * big problem if the userspace just kept retrying with some delay
>> while
>> +	 * it continues to play low value content but most userpace
>> applications
>> +	 * end up throwing an error when it receives one from KMD. This
>> makes
>> +	 * sure we give the dock and the sink devices to complete its power
>> cycle
>> +	 * and then try HDCP authentication. The values of 10 and delay of
>> 50ms
>> +	 * was decided based on multiple trial and errors.
>>  	 */
>> -	for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
>> -		if (!intel_hdcp2_get_capability(connector)) {
>> +	for (i = 0; i < max_retries; i++) {
>> +		if (!intel_hdcp2_get_capability(connector) &&
>> is_dp_encoder) {
>
> Now I am a bit confused, if you are using this Boolean here. Do you
> still need different values for max_retries?

Even more confusing, if you get false for hdcp2 cap with HDMI, you'll
continue with this stuff anyway?! What's the point in that?

BR,
Jani.

>
> Regards
>
> Chaitanya
>
>>  			msleep(50);
>>  			continue;
>>  		}
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-30 10:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-30  2:53 [PATCH] drm/i915/hdcp: Add the loop only for DP encoders Suraj Kandpal
2024-10-30  2:58 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/i915/hdcp: Add the loop only for DP encoders (rev2) Patchwork
2024-10-30  2:58 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-10-30  3:00 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-10-30  3:12 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-10-30  3:14 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-10-30  3:15 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-10-30  3:41 ` ✓ CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-10-30  4:49 ` [PATCH] drm/i915/hdcp: Add the loop only for DP encoders Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2024-10-30 10:21   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2024-10-30 10:28     ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-10-30 10:28   ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-10-30  7:13 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure for drm/i915/hdcp: Add the loop only for DP encoders (rev2) Patchwork
2024-10-30 10:31 ` [PATCH] drm/i915/hdcp: Add the loop only for DP encoders Jani Nikula
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-10-29  8:53 Suraj Kandpal
2024-10-29 10:47 ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2024-10-29 10:54   ` Jani Nikula

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87zfmlnb5x.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).