From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: suraj.kandpal@intel.com, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/12] drm/i915/dss: Move to struct intel_display
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 14:55:02 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zfoz1otl.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240826111527.1113622-4-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024, Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> wrote:
> Use struct intel_display instead of struct drm_i915_private.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dss.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dss.h | 4 ++--
> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> index 28ef6814c56c..de7db5a028db 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> @@ -5115,7 +5115,7 @@ void intel_ddi_init(struct intel_display *display,
> dig_port->hpd_pulse = intel_dp_hpd_pulse;
>
> if (dig_port->dp.mso_link_count)
> - encoder->pipe_mask = intel_dss_splitter_pipe_mask(dev_priv);
> + encoder->pipe_mask = intel_dss_splitter_pipe_mask(display);
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dss.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dss.c
> index 41ea42d234f9..9cb89fe656cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dss.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dss.c
> @@ -14,11 +14,11 @@
> * Splitter enable for eDP MSO is limited to certain pipes, on certain
> * platforms.
> */
> -u8 intel_dss_splitter_pipe_mask(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> +u8 intel_dss_splitter_pipe_mask(struct intel_display *display)
> {
> - if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) > 20)
> + if (DISPLAY_VER(display) > 20)
> return ~0;
> - else if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(i915))
> + else if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(to_i915(display->drm)))
I think it's easier for subsequent conversions to have i915 as a local
variable instead of adding to_i915() inline.
> return BIT(PIPE_A) | BIT(PIPE_B);
> else
> return BIT(PIPE_A);
> @@ -27,28 +27,28 @@ u8 intel_dss_splitter_pipe_mask(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> void intel_dss_get_mso_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config)
> {
> + struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(pipe_config);
> struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(pipe_config->uapi.crtc);
> - struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
> u32 dss1;
>
> - if (!HAS_MSO(i915))
> + if (!HAS_MSO(display))
> return;
>
> - dss1 = intel_de_read(i915, ICL_PIPE_DSS_CTL1(pipe));
> + dss1 = intel_de_read(display, ICL_PIPE_DSS_CTL1(pipe));
>
> pipe_config->splitter.enable = dss1 & SPLITTER_ENABLE;
> if (!pipe_config->splitter.enable)
> return;
>
> - if (drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, !(intel_dss_splitter_pipe_mask(i915) & BIT(pipe)))) {
> + if (drm_WARN_ON(crtc->base.dev, !(intel_dss_splitter_pipe_mask(display) & BIT(pipe)))) {
display->drm
> pipe_config->splitter.enable = false;
> return;
> }
>
> switch (dss1 & SPLITTER_CONFIGURATION_MASK) {
> default:
> - drm_WARN(&i915->drm, true,
> + drm_WARN(crtc->base.dev, true,
display->drm
> "Invalid splitter configuration, dss1=0x%08x\n", dss1);
> fallthrough;
> case SPLITTER_CONFIGURATION_2_SEGMENT:
> @@ -64,12 +64,12 @@ void intel_dss_get_mso_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>
> void intel_dss_configure_mso(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> + struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state);
> struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> - struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
> u32 dss1 = 0;
>
> - if (!HAS_MSO(i915))
> + if (!HAS_MSO(display))
> return;
>
> if (crtc_state->splitter.enable) {
> @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ void intel_dss_configure_mso(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> dss1 |= SPLITTER_CONFIGURATION_4_SEGMENT;
> }
>
> - intel_de_rmw(i915, ICL_PIPE_DSS_CTL1(pipe),
> + intel_de_rmw(display, ICL_PIPE_DSS_CTL1(pipe),
> SPLITTER_ENABLE | SPLITTER_CONFIGURATION_MASK |
> OVERLAP_PIXELS_MASK, dss1);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dss.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dss.h
> index 632a00f0ebc1..0571ee2a19f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dss.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dss.h
> @@ -8,11 +8,11 @@
>
> #include "linux/types.h"
>
> -struct drm_i915_private;
> struct intel_crtc_state;
> +struct intel_display;
> struct intel_encoder;
>
> -u8 intel_dss_splitter_pipe_mask(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
> +u8 intel_dss_splitter_pipe_mask(struct intel_display *display);
> void intel_dss_get_mso_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config);
> void intel_dss_configure_mso(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-26 11:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-26 11:15 [PATCH 00/12] Consolidation of DSS Control in Separate Files Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-26 11:15 ` [PATCH 01/12] drm/i915/display: Move all DSS control registers to a new file Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-26 11:46 ` Jani Nikula
2024-08-26 11:15 ` [PATCH 02/12] drm/i915/ddi: Move all mso related helpers " Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-26 11:52 ` Jani Nikula
2024-08-26 11:15 ` [PATCH 03/12] drm/i915/dss: Move to struct intel_display Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-26 11:55 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2024-08-26 11:15 ` [PATCH 04/12] drm/i915/icl_dsi: Move helpers to configure dsi dual link to intel_dss Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-26 11:58 ` Jani Nikula
2024-08-26 11:15 ` [PATCH 05/12] drm/i915/vdsc: Rename helper to check if the pipe supports dsc Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-26 12:41 ` Jani Nikula
2024-08-29 14:19 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-08-26 11:15 ` [PATCH 06/12] drm/i915/vdsc: Move all dss stuff in dss files Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-26 12:09 ` Jani Nikula
2024-08-26 11:15 ` [PATCH 07/12] drm/i915/display: Move dss stuff in intel_dss files Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-26 12:11 ` Jani Nikula
2024-08-26 11:15 ` [PATCH 08/12] drm/i915/display: Move helper to get joined pipe mask to intel_dss Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-26 12:20 ` Jani Nikula
2024-08-26 11:15 ` [PATCH 09/12] drm/i915/display: Move helpers for primary joiner " Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-26 11:15 ` [PATCH 10/12] drm/i915/display: Move helper to check for secondary joiner pipe Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-26 11:15 ` [PATCH 11/12] drm/i915/display: Move helper to get all secondary pipes Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-26 11:15 ` [PATCH 12/12] drm/i915/display: Move intel_joiner_num_pipes to intel dss Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-26 11:20 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Consolidation of DSS Control in Separate Files Patchwork
2024-08-26 11:21 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-08-26 11:22 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-08-26 11:34 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-08-26 11:36 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-08-26 11:37 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-08-26 11:56 ` ✓ CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-08-26 12:34 ` [PATCH 00/12] " Jani Nikula
2024-08-27 12:20 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-08-26 15:20 ` ✓ CI.FULL: success for " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zfoz1otl.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox