From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3496C282EC for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2025 16:31:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6421D10E487; Mon, 10 Mar 2025 16:31:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gabe.freedesktop.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="P7UUh35G"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.9]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1CE910E487; Mon, 10 Mar 2025 16:31:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1741624284; x=1773160284; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:references:from: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JrpbNker09yLLUVPbiBkbpv89e6haPCHDSIH3ug8BZU=; b=P7UUh35GgNUE75XHAkFqPjSvNF4yEnS0ulDY0ZkXOHzemVTT5nF5K+Xs pDCWRlOGMIVy94umDmi25qSYdZPwnr6TPpzFRGDWL/k1yDmnXZzNv4Qcm +FVr6cfPjxQZIxIG++W5T8AQTpdr8RJ+pQ5HMH+TEPSHfbgi3fqUFKikb 0iLwUY1wfpS4wsEjpOqG8eDGNb6+uO+7ZJEIRVxgred3xEWgXq/GG+Oni /Imz7WreC+1rGS8GXs/drh/hbHXmbGlPouA9bPiFEQ36WmujDXBtEqr1n BJt6LhNX91IstEaHhAl2tUvf9ivNsGbJoMWhKq93qMATQFWaSCEHT4BFs w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: l7xxgW1xQd2xOP7Fy4e24g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 9QL+kFOCRyKOY9KABZQF4Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11369"; a="65084923" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,236,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="65084923" Received: from fmviesa007.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.147]) by orvoesa101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Mar 2025 09:31:15 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: IiGhUct4SV2KFkZdKZQTcg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: gnuUYrchTVm2eQrrLBY60Q== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,236,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="120062789" Received: from irvmail002.ir.intel.com ([10.43.11.120]) by fmviesa007.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Mar 2025 09:31:14 -0700 Received: from [10.246.5.201] (mwajdecz-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com [10.246.5.201]) by irvmail002.ir.intel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E735C34936; Mon, 10 Mar 2025 16:31:12 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <888e00f8-dc32-4b6f-a6af-9be62409388a@intel.com> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 17:31:12 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IOKclyBYZS5DSS5GdWxsOiBmYWlsdXJlIGZvciBVc2UgTUlfTUFU?= =?UTF-8?Q?H_to_apply_RMW_WA_in_LRC_=28rev3=29?= To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, I915-ci-infra@lists.freedesktop.org References: <20250303173522.1822-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> <174146681147.6714.9590700088356022715@18a75f3d1eae> Content-Language: en-US From: Michal Wajdeczko In-Reply-To: <174146681147.6714.9590700088356022715@18a75f3d1eae> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel Xe graphics driver List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-xe-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-xe" On 08.03.2025 21:46, Patchwork wrote: > == Series Details == > > Series: Use MI_MATH to apply RMW WA in LRC (rev3) > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/145732/ > State : failure > > == Summary == > > CI Bug Log - changes from xe-2777-066c46f28642479869d2d1dd27cc6ae476de4abc_full -> xe-pw-145732v3_full > ==================================================== > > Summary > ------- > > **FAILURE** > > Serious unknown changes coming with xe-pw-145732v3_full absolutely need to be > verified manually. > > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes > introduced in xe-pw-145732v3_full, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra@lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. > > > > Participating hosts (4 -> 4) > ------------------------------ > > No changes in participating hosts > > Possible new issues > ------------------- > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in xe-pw-145732v3_full: > > ### IGT changes ### > > #### Possible regressions #### > > * igt@xe_oa@buffer-size: > - shard-lnl: [PASS][1] -> [FAIL][2] > [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-2777-066c46f28642479869d2d1dd27cc6ae476de4abc/shard-lnl-5/igt@xe_oa@buffer-size.html > [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-145732v3/shard-lnl-6/igt@xe_oa@buffer-size.html Starting subtest: buffer-size Starting dynamic subtest: rcs-0-256K (xe_oa:4458) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function test_non_zero_reason, file ../tests/intel/xe_oa.c:2509: (xe_oa:4458) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: !(oa_status & DRM_XE_OASTATUS_BUFFER_OVERFLOW) Dynamic subtest rcs-0-256K failed. hmm, based on the below, this test should be suppressed, no? > > > #### Suppressed #### > > The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or statuses. > They do not affect the overall result. > > * {igt@xe_oa@buffer-size@rcs-0-256k}: > - shard-lnl: [PASS][3] -> [FAIL][4] > [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-2777-066c46f28642479869d2d1dd27cc6ae476de4abc/shard-lnl-5/igt@xe_oa@buffer-size@rcs-0-256k.html > [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-145732v3/shard-lnl-6/igt@xe_oa@buffer-size@rcs-0-256k.html > >