From: "Hogander, Jouni" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
To: "intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/vrr: Fix transmission line for Adaptive Sync SDP
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 10:35:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <889b6ce6df4a7f441f333a8c43a7a8a02c5bacf7.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251023081614.2645242-1-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
On Thu, 2025-10-23 at 13:46 +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
> Currently the EMP_AS_SDP_TL is set to vrr.vsync_start which is
> incorrect.
>
> As per Bspec:71197 the transmission line must be within the SCL +
> guardband region. Before guardband optimization, guradband was same
> as
> vblank length so EMP_AS_SDP_TL set with vrr.sync_start was falling in
> this region and it was not giving an issue.
>
> Now with optimized guardband, this is falling outside the SCL +
> guardband region and since the same transmission line is used by VSC
> SDP
> also, this results in PSR timeout issues.
>
> Further restrictions on the position of the transmission line:
> For DP/eDP, if there is a set context latency (SCL) window, then it
> cannot be the first line of SCL
> For DP/eDP, if there is no SCL window, then it cannot be the first
> line of
> the Delayed V. Blank
>
> Fix the EMP_AS_SDP_TL to VTOTAL - (delayed vblank_start - SCL + 1)
> Internally the HW computes the value as VTOTAL - EMP_AS_SDP_TL.
>
> Fixes: e1123e617e51 ("drm/i915/vrr: Program EMP_AS_SDP_TL for DP AS
> SDP")
> Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c | 12 +++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c
> index 92fb72b56f16..dd81d2133aba 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c
> @@ -655,18 +655,24 @@ void
> intel_vrr_set_db_point_and_transmission_line(const struct
> intel_crtc_state
> {
> struct intel_display *display =
> to_intel_display(crtc_state);
> enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = crtc_state->cpu_transcoder;
> + const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode = &crtc_state-
> >hw.adjusted_mode;
> + int transmission_line;
>
> /*
> * For BMG and LNL+ onwards the EMP_AS_SDP_TL is used for
> programming
> * double buffering point and transmission line for VRR
> packets for
> * HDMI2.1/DP/eDP/DP->HDMI2.1 PCON.
> * Since currently we support VRR only for DP/eDP, so this
> is programmed
> - * to for Adaptive Sync SDP to Vsync start.
> + * for Adaptive Sync SDP.
> */
> - if (DISPLAY_VERx100(display) == 1401 || DISPLAY_VER(display)
> >= 20)
> + if (DISPLAY_VERx100(display) == 1401 || DISPLAY_VER(display)
> >= 20) {
> + transmission_line = adjusted_mode->crtc_vtotal -
> (adjusted_mode->crtc_vblank_start -
> +
> crtc_state->set_context_latency +
> +
> 1);
> intel_de_write(display,
> EMP_AS_SDP_TL(display,
> cpu_transcoder),
> - EMP_AS_SDP_DB_TL(crtc_state-
> >vrr.vsync_start));
> + EMP_AS_SDP_DB_TL(transmission_line));
> + }
> }
>
> static int intel_vrr_hw_vmin(const struct intel_crtc_state
> *crtc_state)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-23 10:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-23 8:16 [PATCH] drm/i915/vrr: Fix transmission line for Adaptive Sync SDP Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-23 10:35 ` Hogander, Jouni [this message]
2025-10-23 12:04 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-10-23 12:27 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-10-23 12:45 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-10-23 14:40 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-10-23 15:07 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-10-23 16:57 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-10-23 15:08 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-10-24 4:00 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-10-24 12:00 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-10-24 12:39 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-10-27 11:07 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-10-23 12:22 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for " Patchwork
2025-10-23 13:05 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-10-23 20:28 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=889b6ce6df4a7f441f333a8c43a7a8a02c5bacf7.camel@intel.com \
--to=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox