Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Lis, Tomasz" <tomasz.lis@intel.com>
To: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>,
	<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "Michał Winiarski" <michal.winiarski@intel.com>,
	"Piotr Piórkowski" <piotr.piorkowski@intel.com>,
	"Matthew Brost" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
	"Lucas De Marchi" <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/7] drm/xe/vf: Finish RESFIX by reset if CTB not enabled
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 01:27:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <89a7c36e-a588-40be-9037-7f82d6abd1ef@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <779be9db-0359-4af2-b4f3-9cf90836162f@intel.com>


On 14.05.2025 19:23, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
>
> On 14.05.2025 00:49, Tomasz Lis wrote:
>> The RESFIX state should be achievable only when CTB communication is
>> enabled. If CTB was disabled and we still got it, then either we're
>> dealing with unclean initial state, or the driver is not currently
>> functional. In these cases, exit the RESFIX state by reset.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf.c | 10 ++++++++++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.c    | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.h    |  1 +
>>   3 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf.c
>> index 4ff7ae1a5f16..b9af112ca771 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf.c
>> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>>   #include "xe_gt_sriov_vf.h"
>>   #include "xe_gt_sriov_vf_types.h"
>>   #include "xe_guc.h"
>> +#include "xe_guc_ct.h"
>>   #include "xe_guc_hxg_helpers.h"
>>   #include "xe_guc_relay.h"
>>   #include "xe_mmio.h"
>> @@ -932,6 +933,15 @@ void xe_gt_sriov_vf_migrated_event_handler(struct xe_gt *gt)
>>   
>>   	xe_gt_assert(gt, IS_SRIOV_VF(xe));
>>   
>> +	if (!xe_guc_ct_enabled(&gt->uc.guc.ct)) {
>> +		/*
>> +		 * If at driver init, ignore migration which happened
>> +		 * before the driver was loaded.
>> +		 */
>> +		xe_sriov_vf_post_migration_reset_guc_state(xe);
> this triggers async-reset on all GTs, not only on this one where CTB is
> off but on other GTs that might have CTB enabled and running - is it
> safe to reset them too?

There should be no situation where some GuCs are in RESFIX_BLOCKED while 
others are running. Also we're always probing/suspending/resuming in 
`for_each_gt()` - so there also can't be a normal (non-exceptional) 
situation where one GT disabled the CTB and the rest require a standard 
post-migration recovery.

We may receive an IRQ from only one, or from all of the GuCs - either 
way we should respond with resetting all.

It is likely that the current probe/resume will fail anyway, resulting 
in a wedge. But by resetting all we will get to a state where retry 
(unbind+bind again) should work.

> and if CTB is off, can't we just wait with "recovery" once we actually
> start the CTB later on?

Enabling CTB will fail in RESFIX_BLOCKED state. Very few commands are 
accepted by GuC in that state.

>> +		return;
>> +	}
>> +
>>   	set_bit(gt->info.id, &xe->sriov.vf.migration.gt_flags);
>>   	/*
>>   	 * We need to be certain that if all flags were set, at least one
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.c
>> index 2674fa948fda..940b81036321 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.c
>> @@ -134,6 +134,24 @@ void xe_sriov_vf_init_early(struct xe_device *xe)
>>   	INIT_WORK(&xe->sriov.vf.migration.worker, migration_worker_func);
>>   }
>>   
>> +/**
>> + * xe_sriov_vf_post_migration_reset_guc_state - Reset VF state in all GuCs.
>> + * @xe: the &xe_device struct instance
>> + *
>> + * This function sends VF state reset to GuC, as a way of exiting RESFIX
>> + * state if a proper post-migration recovery procedure has failed.
>> + */
>> +void xe_sriov_vf_post_migration_reset_guc_state(struct xe_device *xe)
>> +{
>> +	struct xe_gt *gt;
>> +	unsigned int id;
>> +
>> +	for_each_gt(gt, xe, id)
>> +		xe_gt_reset_async(gt);
>> +
>> +	drm_notice(&xe->drm, "VF migration recovery reset scheduled\n");
> note that there likely will be already
>
> GT0: trying reset from xe_sriov_vf_post_migration_reset_guc_state
> GT0: reset queued
> GT1: trying reset from xe_sriov_vf_post_migration_reset_guc_state
> GT1: reset queued

right, will remove the extra message.

-Tomasz

>> +}
>> +
>>   /**
>>    * vf_post_migration_requery_guc - Re-query GuC for current VF provisioning.
>>    * @xe: the &xe_device struct instance
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.h
>> index 7b8622cff2b7..ba846af34a13 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.h
>> @@ -10,5 +10,6 @@ struct xe_device;
>>   
>>   void xe_sriov_vf_init_early(struct xe_device *xe);
>>   void xe_sriov_vf_start_migration_recovery(struct xe_device *xe);
>> +void xe_sriov_vf_post_migration_reset_guc_state(struct xe_device *xe);
>>   
>>   #endif

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-14 23:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-13 22:49 [PATCH v1 0/7] drm/xe/vf: Post-migration recovery of queues and jobs Tomasz Lis
2025-05-13 22:49 ` [PATCH v1 1/7] drm/xe/sa: Avoid caching GGTT address within the manager Tomasz Lis
2025-05-14 16:36   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-05-14 18:23   ` Matthew Brost
2025-05-13 22:49 ` [PATCH v1 2/7] drm/xe/vf: Finish RESFIX by reset if CTB not enabled Tomasz Lis
2025-05-14 17:23   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-05-14 23:27     ` Lis, Tomasz [this message]
2025-05-13 22:49 ` [PATCH v1 3/7] drm/xe/vf: Pause submissions during RESFIX fixups Tomasz Lis
2025-05-14 18:06   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-05-15 12:56     ` Lis, Tomasz
2025-05-13 22:49 ` [PATCH v1 4/7] drm/xe: Block reset while recovering from VF migration Tomasz Lis
2025-05-13 22:49 ` [PATCH v1 5/7] drm/xe/vf: Rebase HWSP of all contexts after migration Tomasz Lis
2025-05-14 18:37   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-05-15 22:07     ` Lis, Tomasz
2025-05-13 22:49 ` [PATCH v1 6/7] drm/xe/vf: Rebase MEMIRQ structures for " Tomasz Lis
2025-05-14 20:03   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-05-15 22:07     ` Lis, Tomasz
2025-05-13 22:49 ` [PATCH v1 7/7] drm/xe/vf: Post migration, repopulate ring area for pending request Tomasz Lis
2025-05-14 18:49   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-05-15 22:08     ` Lis, Tomasz
2025-05-14 20:04 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/vf: Post-migration recovery of queues and jobs Patchwork
2025-05-14 20:04 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-05-14 20:06 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-05-14 20:16 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-05-14 20:19 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-05-14 20:20 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-05-14 21:11 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-05-15  4:52 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=89a7c36e-a588-40be-9037-7f82d6abd1ef@intel.com \
    --to=tomasz.lis@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
    --cc=michal.winiarski@intel.com \
    --cc=piotr.piorkowski@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox