From: "Summers, Stuart" <stuart.summers@intel.com>
To: "intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Dugast, Francois" <francois.dugast@intel.com>
Cc: "Brost, Matthew" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
"Mrozek, Michal" <michal.mrozek@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] drm/xe/gt_pagefault: Add tracepoints when handing page faults
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2025 19:08:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8fd9e885a3b8cbaa422ff7825fa93c8083aa36c8.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250909150437.986365-3-francois.dugast@intel.com>
On Tue, 2025-09-09 at 17:03 +0200, Francois Dugast wrote:
> Add a new tracepoints when handling VMA and SVM page faults.
>
> Signed-off-by: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault.c | 22 ++++--------
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault_types.h | 25 ++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_trace.h | 40
> ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault_types.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault.c
> index d02d22fb3659..50836df79950 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault.c
> @@ -20,24 +20,11 @@
> #include "xe_guc_ct.h"
> #include "xe_migrate.h"
> #include "xe_svm.h"
> +#include "xe_trace.h"
> #include "xe_trace_bo.h"
> #include "xe_vm.h"
> #include "xe_vram_types.h"
>
> -struct pagefault {
> - u64 page_addr;
> - u32 asid;
> - u16 pdata;
> - u8 vfid;
> - u8 access_type;
> - u8 fault_type;
> - u8 fault_level;
> - u8 engine_class;
> - u8 engine_instance;
> - u8 fault_unsuccessful;
> - bool trva_fault;
> -};
I'd rather wait to add this on top of the page fault series Matt has on
the list.
> -
> enum access_type {
> ACCESS_TYPE_READ = 0,
> ACCESS_TYPE_WRITE = 1,
> @@ -209,11 +196,14 @@ static int handle_pagefault(struct xe_gt *gt,
> struct pagefault *pf)
>
> atomic = access_is_atomic(pf->access_type);
>
> - if (xe_vma_is_cpu_addr_mirror(vma))
> + if (xe_vma_is_cpu_addr_mirror(vma)) {
> + trace_xe_handle_svm_pagefault(xe, pf);
Can you add this directly into the xe_svm_handle_pagefault routine
instead of in the outer layer here?
> err = xe_svm_handle_pagefault(vm, vma, gt,
> pf->page_addr, atomic);
> - else
> + } else {
> + trace_xe_handle_vma_pagefault(xe, pf);
> err = handle_vma_pagefault(gt, vma, atomic);
> + }
>
> unlock_vm:
> if (!err)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault_types.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault_types.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..431b1469d79b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault_types.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
> +/*
> + * Copyright © 2025 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef _XE_GT_PAGEFAULT_TYPES_H_
> +#define _XE_GT_PAGEFAULT_TYPES_H_
> +
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +struct pagefault {
> + u64 page_addr;
> + u32 asid;
> + u16 pdata;
> + u8 vfid;
> + u8 access_type;
> + u8 fault_type;
> + u8 fault_level;
> + u8 engine_class;
> + u8 engine_instance;
> + u8 fault_unsuccessful;
> + bool trva_fault;
> +};
> +
> +#endif /* _XE_GT_PAGEFAULT_TYPES_ */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_trace.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_trace.h
> index b9f59651771e..8587982e7eee 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_trace.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_trace.h
> @@ -14,8 +14,10 @@
>
> #include "xe_exec_queue_types.h"
> #include "xe_gpu_scheduler_types.h"
> +#include "xe_gt_pagefault_types.h"
> #include "xe_gt_types.h"
> #include "xe_guc_exec_queue_types.h"
> +#include "xe_hw_engine.h"
> #include "xe_migrate_types.h"
> #include "xe_sched_job.h"
> #include "xe_tlb_inval_types.h"
> @@ -473,6 +475,44 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(xe_migrate, xe_migrate_vram,
> TP_ARGS(xe, len, vram_addr, dir)
> );
>
> +DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(xe_pagefault,
> + TP_PROTO(struct xe_device *xe, struct pagefault
> *pf),
> + TP_ARGS(xe, pf),
> +
> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> + __string(dev, __dev_name_xe(xe))
> + __field(u64, page_addr)
> + __field(u8, fault_type)
> + __field(u8, access_type)
> + __field(u8, fault_level)
> + __field(u8, engine_class)
> + __field(u8, engine_instance)
Also this information is more pagefault specific and not really to SVM
specifically. Instead of moving to xe_svm.c, you could just put this
outside of the svm if condition above to cover all cases.
> + ),
> +
> + TP_fast_assign(
> + __assign_str(dev);
> + __entry->page_addr = pf->page_addr;
And yeah something about the VM we found would also be interesting
here.
> + ),
> +
> + TP_printk("dev=%s addr=%llx fault_type=%d
> access_type=%d fault_level=%d engine_class=%d %s engine_instance=%d",
> + __get_str(dev), __entry->page_addr,
> + __entry->fault_type, __entry-
> >access_type,
> + __entry->fault_level, __entry-
> >engine_class,
> + xe_hw_engine_class_to_str(
> + __entry->engine_class),
> + __entry->engine_instance)
> +);
> +
> +DEFINE_EVENT(xe_pagefault, xe_handle_vma_pagefault,
> + TP_PROTO(struct xe_device *xe, struct pagefault *pf),
> + TP_ARGS(xe, pf)
> +);
> +
> +DEFINE_EVENT(xe_pagefault, xe_handle_svm_pagefault,
> + TP_PROTO(struct xe_device *xe, struct pagefault *pf),
> + TP_ARGS(xe, pf)
Yeah I just don't see why we need both of these from your patch, other
than just to tell whether the cpu mirror support is set.
Thanks,
Stuart
> +);
> +
> #endif
>
> /* This part must be outside protection */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-09 19:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-09 15:03 [RFC 0/2] Add tracepoints to profile SVM page faults and migration Francois Dugast
2025-09-09 15:03 ` [RFC 1/2] drm/xe/migrate: Add tracepoint during VRAM copy Francois Dugast
2025-09-09 19:03 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-09-09 15:03 ` [RFC 2/2] drm/xe/gt_pagefault: Add tracepoints when handing page faults Francois Dugast
2025-09-09 19:08 ` Summers, Stuart [this message]
2025-09-09 20:29 ` Matthew Brost
2025-09-10 17:33 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-09-10 7:59 ` Francois Dugast
2025-09-10 17:57 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-09-09 15:11 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Add tracepoints to profile SVM page faults and migration Patchwork
2025-09-09 15:12 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-09-09 15:47 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-09-09 20:43 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8fd9e885a3b8cbaa422ff7825fa93c8083aa36c8.camel@intel.com \
--to=stuart.summers@intel.com \
--cc=francois.dugast@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=michal.mrozek@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox