Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
To: Zhanjun Dong <zhanjun.dong@intel.com>, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] drm/xe/guc: Add new debugfs entry for lfd format output
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 17:34:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <95d22c4d-73b5-47d8-b619-ed466ee0741b@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250410155853.574830-3-zhanjun.dong@intel.com>



On 10.04.2025 17:58, Zhanjun Dong wrote:
> Add new debugfs entry "guc_log_lfd", prepared for output guc log
> in LFD(Log Format Descriptors) format.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhanjun Dong <zhanjun.dong@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_debugfs.c | 14 ++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_log.c     | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_log.h     |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 49 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_debugfs.c
> index c569ff456e74..6449c9a69b8a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_debugfs.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,19 @@ static int guc_log(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int guc_log_lfd(struct seq_file *m, void *data)

this needs to be rebased due to commit e15826bb3c2c ("drm/xe/guc:
Refactor GuC debugfs initialization")

and placed in the pf_only[]

> +{
> +	struct xe_guc *guc = node_to_guc(m->private);
> +	struct xe_device *xe = guc_to_xe(guc);
> +	struct drm_printer p = drm_seq_file_printer(m);
> +
> +	xe_pm_runtime_get(xe);
> +	xe_guc_log_print_lfd(&guc->log, &p);
> +	xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int guc_log_dmesg(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
>  {
>  	struct xe_guc *guc = node_to_guc(m->private);
> @@ -89,6 +102,7 @@ static int guc_pc(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
>  static const struct drm_info_list debugfs_list[] = {
>  	{"guc_info", guc_info, 0},
>  	{"guc_log", guc_log, 0},
> +	{"guc_log_lfd", guc_log_lfd, 0},
>  	{"guc_log_dmesg", guc_log_dmesg, 0},
>  	{"guc_ctb", guc_ctb, 0},
>  	{"guc_pc", guc_pc, 0},
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_log.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_log.c
> index 38039c411387..df849a0ee7e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_log.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_log.c
> @@ -216,6 +216,26 @@ void xe_guc_log_snapshot_print(struct xe_guc_log_snapshot *snapshot, struct drm_
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static void
> +xe_guc_log_snapshot_print_lfd(struct xe_guc_log_snapshot *snapshot, struct drm_printer *p,
> +			      struct xe_guc_log *log)
> +{
> +	size_t remain;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	if (!snapshot)
> +		return;
> +
> +	remain = snapshot->size;
> +	for (i = 0; i < snapshot->num_chunks; i++) {
> +		size_t size = min(GUC_LOG_CHUNK_SIZE, remain);
> +
> +		/* To be add: Output snapshot in LFD format */

what's the point in adding debugfs entry without implementation?

add required function(s) and only *then* extend debugfs

> +
> +		remain -= size;
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * xe_guc_log_print_dmesg - dump a copy of the GuC log to dmesg
>   * @log: GuC log structure
> @@ -251,6 +271,20 @@ void xe_guc_log_print(struct xe_guc_log *log, struct drm_printer *p)
>  	xe_guc_log_snapshot_free(snapshot);
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * xe_guc_log_print_lfd - dump a copy of the GuC log to some useful location

s/to some useful location/to the drm_printer

> + * @log: GuC log structure
> + * @p: the printer object to output to
> + */
> +void xe_guc_log_print_lfd(struct xe_guc_log *log, struct drm_printer *p)
> +{
> +	struct xe_guc_log_snapshot *snapshot;
> +
> +	snapshot = xe_guc_log_snapshot_capture(log, false);
> +	xe_guc_log_snapshot_print_lfd(snapshot, p, log);
> +	xe_guc_log_snapshot_free(snapshot);
> +}
> +
>  int xe_guc_log_init(struct xe_guc_log *log)
>  {
>  	struct xe_device *xe = log_to_xe(log);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_log.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_log.h
> index 5b896f5fafaf..37ff4d11e6cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_log.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_log.h
> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ struct xe_device;
>  
>  int xe_guc_log_init(struct xe_guc_log *log);
>  void xe_guc_log_print(struct xe_guc_log *log, struct drm_printer *p);
> +void xe_guc_log_print_lfd(struct xe_guc_log *log, struct drm_printer *p);
>  void xe_guc_log_print_dmesg(struct xe_guc_log *log);
>  struct xe_guc_log_snapshot *xe_guc_log_snapshot_capture(struct xe_guc_log *log, bool atomic);
>  void xe_guc_log_snapshot_print(struct xe_guc_log_snapshot *snapshot, struct drm_printer *p);


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-04-11 15:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-10 15:58 [PATCH v3 0/4] drm/xe/guc: Add LFD format output for guc log Zhanjun Dong
2025-04-10 15:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] drm/xe/guc: Add LFD related abi definitions Zhanjun Dong
2025-04-10 17:50   ` Cavitt, Jonathan
2025-04-10 22:20     ` Dong, Zhanjun
2025-04-10 22:29       ` Cavitt, Jonathan
2025-04-11 15:28   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-04-11 21:58     ` Dong, Zhanjun
2025-04-10 15:58 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] drm/xe/guc: Add new debugfs entry for lfd format output Zhanjun Dong
2025-04-10 17:50   ` Cavitt, Jonathan
2025-04-10 22:45     ` Dong, Zhanjun
2025-04-11 15:34   ` Michal Wajdeczko [this message]
2025-04-11 22:40     ` Dong, Zhanjun
2025-04-10 15:58 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] drm/xe/guc: Add GuC log LFD format support Zhanjun Dong
2025-04-10 17:52   ` Cavitt, Jonathan
2025-04-11 16:14   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-04-11 22:58     ` Dong, Zhanjun
2025-04-10 15:58 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] drm/xe/guc: Only add GuC crash dump if available Zhanjun Dong
2025-04-10 17:52   ` Cavitt, Jonathan
2025-04-10 16:03 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/guc: Add LFD format output for guc log (rev3) Patchwork
2025-04-10 16:04 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-04-10 16:05 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-04-10 16:13 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-04-10 16:15 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-04-10 16:17 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-04-10 16:53 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-04-10 21:00 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=95d22c4d-73b5-47d8-b619-ed466ee0741b@intel.com \
    --to=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=zhanjun.dong@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox