From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/dp: Drop using intel_de_read_notrace()
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 17:53:33 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <971cd820abef78c947ee66a98b4c1a7a433ec361@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260930115303.24285-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, 30 Sep 2026, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> I want to eliminate intel_de_read_notrace() to shrink the
> intel_de.h API a bit. That should help with the cleaning out
> the remaining uncore mess for xe vs. i915.
>
> Furthermore on xe intel_de_read_notrace() doesn't even do
> what it says on the tin, and instead all register accesses
> are traced anyway.
>
> Switch the last users of intel_de_read_notrace()
> (intel_dp_aux_wait_done() and intel_dp_aux_xfer())
> over to the normal intel_de_read().
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.c
> index 3cb07b0a901c..cd361164ecb8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.c
> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ intel_dp_aux_wait_done(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> int ret;
>
> if (intel_parent_irq_enabled(display)) {
> -#define C (((status = intel_de_read_notrace(display, ch_ctl)) & DP_AUX_CH_CTL_SEND_BUSY) == 0)
> +#define C (((status = intel_de_read(display, ch_ctl)) & DP_AUX_CH_CTL_SEND_BUSY) == 0)
> done = wait_event_timeout(display->gmbus.wait_queue, C,
> msecs_to_jiffies_timeout(timeout_ms));
>
> @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ intel_dp_aux_xfer(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>
> /* Try to wait for any previous AUX channel activity */
> for (try = 0; try < 3; try++) {
> - status = intel_de_read_notrace(display, ch_ctl);
> + status = intel_de_read(display, ch_ctl);
> if ((status & DP_AUX_CH_CTL_SEND_BUSY) == 0)
> break;
> msleep(1);
Sashiko has a point that there's now an extra trace call below this.
With that fixed,
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-30 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-30 11:53 [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/gmbus: Switch GMBUS fully to _fw() register accesses Ville Syrjala
2026-09-30 11:53 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/dp: Drop using intel_de_read_notrace() Ville Syrjala
2026-09-30 12:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-30 14:53 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2026-10-01 15:16 ` Jani Nikula
2026-10-02 13:57 ` [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2026-09-30 11:53 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/de: Nuke intel_de_{read,write}_notrace() Ville Syrjala
2026-09-30 12:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-30 14:54 ` Jani Nikula
2026-09-30 12:01 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for series starting with [1/3] drm/i915/gmbus: Switch GMBUS fully to _fw() register accesses Patchwork
2026-09-30 12:04 ` [PATCH 1/3] " sashiko-bot
2026-09-30 13:16 ` [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2026-09-30 14:14 ` Jani Nikula
2026-09-30 13:24 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for series starting with [v2,1/3] drm/i915/gmbus: Switch GMBUS fully to _fw() register accesses (rev2) Patchwork
2026-09-30 13:35 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/3] drm/i915/gmbus: Switch GMBUS fully to _fw() register accesses Patchwork
2026-09-30 15:02 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v2,1/3] drm/i915/gmbus: Switch GMBUS fully to _fw() register accesses (rev2) Patchwork
2026-09-30 18:11 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
2026-10-02 14:05 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for series starting with [v2,1/3] drm/i915/gmbus: Switch GMBUS fully to _fw() register accesses (rev3) Patchwork
2026-10-02 14:49 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-10-02 16:26 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=971cd820abef78c947ee66a98b4c1a7a433ec361@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox