From: "Ghimiray, Himal Prasad" <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
To: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>, <john.c.harrison@intel.com>,
<rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>, <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
<matthew.auld@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] drm/xe/guc/ct: Flush g2h worker in case of g2h response timeout
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 19:13:40 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <97587abc-acc6-42f6-ad78-cbbd2607c48a@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241017111410.2553784-2-badal.nilawar@intel.com>
On 17-10-2024 16:44, Badal Nilawar wrote:
> In case if g2h worker doesn't get opportunity to within specified
> timeout delay then flush the g2h worker explicitly.
>
> v2:
> - Describe change in the comment and add TODO (Matt B/John H)
> - Add xe_gt_warn on fence done after G2H flush (John H)
> v3:
> - Updated the comment with root cause
> - Clean up xe_gt_warn message (John H)
>
> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/1620
> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/2902
> Signed-off-by: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
> Cc: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> index c7673f56d413..c260d8840990 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> @@ -1018,6 +1018,24 @@ static int guc_ct_send_recv(struct xe_guc_ct *ct, const u32 *action, u32 len,
>
> ret = wait_event_timeout(ct->g2h_fence_wq, g2h_fence.done, HZ);
>
> + /*
> + * Occasionally it is seen that the G2H worker starts running after a delay of more than
> + * a second even after being queued and activated by the Linux workqueue subsystem. This
> + * leads to G2H timeout error. The root cause of issue lies with scheduling latency of
> + * Lunarlake Hybrid CPU. Issue dissappears if we disable Lunarlake atom cores from BIOS
> + * and this is beyond xe kmd.
> + *
> + * TODO: Drop this change once workqueue scheduling delay issue is fixed on LNL Hybrid CPU.
> + */
> + if (!ret) {
> + flush_work(&ct->g2h_worker);
> + if (g2h_fence.done) {
> + xe_gt_warn(gt, "G2H fence %u, action %04x, done\n",
> + g2h_fence.seqno, action[0]);
> + ret = 1;
> + }
> + }
> +
LGTM
Reviewed-by: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
> /*
> * Ensure we serialize with completion side to prevent UAF with fence going out of scope on
> * the stack, since we have no clue if it will fire after the timeout before we can erase
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-17 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-17 11:14 [PATCH v3 0/1] Workaround to handle G2H timeout Badal Nilawar
2024-10-17 11:14 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] drm/xe/guc/ct: Flush g2h worker in case of g2h response timeout Badal Nilawar
2024-10-17 13:43 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad [this message]
2024-10-17 15:17 ` Matthew Brost
2024-10-18 0:05 ` John Harrison
2024-10-17 11:15 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Workaround to handle G2H timeout (rev2) Patchwork
2024-10-17 11:15 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-10-17 11:16 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-10-17 11:28 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-10-17 11:30 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-10-17 11:32 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-10-17 22:36 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2024-10-18 3:49 ` ✓ CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=97587abc-acc6-42f6-ad78-cbbd2607c48a@intel.com \
--to=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=john.c.harrison@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox