From: "Souza, Jose" <jose.souza@intel.com>
To: "intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com"
<maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 9/9] drm/xe: Implement capture of HWSP and HWCTX
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 15:30:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <97dedcc441b4e2dc09bacef8ca60af6c5c4036a3.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aa36acf27826fb1df71bb83f55daa74958727497.camel@intel.com>
On Wed, 2024-02-21 at 17:56 +0000, Souza, Jose wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-02-21 at 14:30 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> > Capture both the HWSP and the HW ctx page to allow easier replaying of
> > error dumps for debugging.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c
> > index 20f235cdaca34..93c139f8d4fed 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c
> > @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
> >
> > #include "xe_lrc.h"
> >
> > +#include <linux/ascii85.h>
> > +
> > #include "instructions/xe_mi_commands.h"
> > #include "instructions/xe_gfxpipe_commands.h"
> > #include "regs/xe_engine_regs.h"
> > @@ -32,6 +34,10 @@
> > #define ENGINE_INSTANCE_SHIFT 48
> >
> > struct xe_lrc_snapshot {
> > + struct xe_bo *lrc_bo;
> > + void *lrc_snapshot;
> > + unsigned long lrc_size, lrc_offset;
> > +
> > u32 context_desc;
> > u32 head;
> > struct {
> > @@ -1333,19 +1339,43 @@ struct xe_lrc_snapshot *xe_lrc_snapshot_capture(struct xe_lrc *lrc)
> > snapshot->tail.memory = xe_lrc_read_ctx_reg(lrc, CTX_RING_TAIL);
> > snapshot->start_seqno = xe_lrc_start_seqno(lrc);
> > snapshot->seqno = xe_lrc_seqno(lrc);
> > + snapshot->lrc_bo = xe_bo_get(lrc->bo);
> > + snapshot->lrc_offset = xe_lrc_pphwsp_offset(lrc);
> > + snapshot->lrc_size = lrc->bo->size - snapshot->lrc_offset;
> > + snapshot->lrc_snapshot = NULL;
> > return snapshot;
> > }
> >
> > void xe_lrc_snapshot_capture_delayed(struct xe_lrc_snapshot *snapshot)
> > {
> > + struct xe_bo *bo;
> > + struct iosys_map src;
> > +
> > if (!snapshot)
> > return;
> >
> > - /* TODO: Copy status page */
> > + bo = snapshot->lrc_bo;
> > + snapshot->lrc_snapshot = kvmalloc(snapshot->lrc_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!snapshot->lrc_snapshot)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + dma_resv_lock(bo->ttm.base.resv, NULL);
> > + if (!ttm_bo_vmap(&bo->ttm, &src)) {
> > + xe_map_memcpy_from(xe_bo_device(bo),
> > + snapshot->lrc_snapshot, &src, snapshot->lrc_offset,
> > + snapshot->lrc_size);
> > + ttm_bo_vunmap(&bo->ttm, &src);
> > + } else {
> > + kvfree(snapshot->lrc_snapshot);
> > + snapshot->lrc_snapshot = NULL;
> > + }
> > + dma_resv_unlock(bo->ttm.base.resv);
> > }
> >
> > void xe_lrc_snapshot_print(struct xe_lrc_snapshot *snapshot, struct drm_printer *p)
> > {
> > + unsigned long i;
> > +
> > if (!snapshot)
> > return;
> >
> > @@ -1355,9 +1385,37 @@ void xe_lrc_snapshot_print(struct xe_lrc_snapshot *snapshot, struct drm_printer
> > snapshot->tail.internal, snapshot->tail.memory);
> > drm_printf(p, "\tStart seqno: (memory) %d\n", snapshot->start_seqno);
> > drm_printf(p, "\tSeqno: (memory) %d\n", snapshot->seqno);
> > +
> > + if (!snapshot->lrc_snapshot)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + drm_printf(p, "\t HWSP length: 0x%x\n", LRC_PPHWSP_SIZE);
> > + drm_puts(p, "\tHWSP data: ");
>
> drm_printf(p, "\t[HWSP].length: 0x%x\n", LRC_PPHWSP_SIZE);
> drm_puts(p, "\t[HWSP].data: ");
>
> to make it consistent with VM state
HWSP and HWCTX should be placed in 'HW Engines' section under each engine?
What if a future HW moves out of GuC?
>
>
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < LRC_PPHWSP_SIZE; i += sizeof(u32)) {
> > + u32 *val = snapshot->lrc_snapshot + i;
> > + char dumped[ASCII85_BUFSZ];
> > +
> > + drm_puts(p, ascii85_encode(*val, dumped));
> > + }
>
> new line here
>
> > + drm_printf(p, "\n\tHWCTX length: 0x%lx\n", snapshot->lrc_size - LRC_PPHWSP_SIZE);
> > + drm_puts(p, "\tHWCTX data: ");
>
> drm_printf(p, "\n\t[HWCTX].length: 0x%lx\n", snapshot->lrc_size - LRC_PPHWSP_SIZE);
> drm_puts(p, "\t[HWCTX].data: ");
>
> > + for (; i < snapshot->lrc_size; i += sizeof(u32)) {
> > + u32 *val = snapshot->lrc_snapshot + i;
> > + char dumped[ASCII85_BUFSZ];
> > +
> > + drm_puts(p, ascii85_encode(*val, dumped));
> > + }
> > + drm_puts(p, "\n");
> > }
> >
> > void xe_lrc_snapshot_free(struct xe_lrc_snapshot *snapshot)
> > {
> > + if (!snapshot)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + kvfree(snapshot->lrc_snapshot);
> > + if (snapshot->lrc_bo)
> > + xe_bo_put(snapshot->lrc_bo);
> > kfree(snapshot);
> > }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-22 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-21 13:30 [PATCH v5 1/9] drm/xe/snapshot: Remove drm_err on guc alloc failures Maarten Lankhorst
2024-02-21 13:30 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] drm/xe: Clear all snapshot members after deleting coredump Maarten Lankhorst
2024-02-21 15:09 ` Francois Dugast
2024-02-21 13:30 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] drm/xe: Add uapi for dumpable bos Maarten Lankhorst
2024-02-21 13:30 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] drm/xe: Annotate each dumpable vma as such Maarten Lankhorst
2024-02-21 13:30 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] drm/xe: Add vm snapshot mutex for easily taking a vm snapshot during devcoredump Maarten Lankhorst
2024-02-21 13:30 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] drm/xe: Implement VM snapshot support for BO's and userptr Maarten Lankhorst
2024-02-21 13:30 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] drm/xe: Move lrc snapshot capturing to xe_lrc.c Maarten Lankhorst
2024-02-21 17:56 ` Souza, Jose
2024-02-21 19:27 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2024-02-21 13:30 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] drm/xe: Add infrastructure for delayed LRC capture Maarten Lankhorst
2024-02-21 13:30 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] drm/xe: Implement capture of HWSP and HWCTX Maarten Lankhorst
2024-02-21 17:26 ` Souza, Jose
2024-02-21 17:29 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2024-02-21 17:44 ` Souza, Jose
2024-02-21 17:45 ` Souza, Jose
2024-02-21 17:56 ` Souza, Jose
2024-02-22 15:30 ` Souza, Jose [this message]
2024-02-21 13:37 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [v5,1/9] drm/xe/snapshot: Remove drm_err on guc alloc failures Patchwork
2024-02-21 13:38 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-02-21 13:40 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-02-21 13:52 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-02-21 13:53 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-02-21 13:54 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-02-21 14:02 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] " Francois Dugast
2024-02-21 14:30 ` ✓ CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v5,1/9] " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=97dedcc441b4e2dc09bacef8ca60af6c5c4036a3.camel@intel.com \
--to=jose.souza@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox