From: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com>
To: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe/bmg: improve cache flushing behaviour
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 12:53:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9d3f3a9d-bfde-4a06-a776-743b1ed47236@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240902153744.63456-2-matthew.auld@intel.com>
On 9/2/2024 5:37 PM, Matthew Auld wrote:
> The BSpec seems to suggest that EN_L3_RW_CCS_CACHE_FLUSH must be toggled
> on for manual global invalidation to take effect
I couldn't find this reference, in which bspec is this mentioned ?
Regards,
Nirmoy
> and actually flush
> device cache, however this also turns on flushing for things like
> pipecontrol, which occurs between submissions for compute/render. This
> sounds like massive overkill for our needs, where we already have the
> manual flushing on the display side with the global invalidation. Some
> observations on BMG:
>
> 1. Disabling l2 caching for host writes and stubbing out the driver
> global invalidation but keeping EN_L3_RW_CCS_CACHE_FLUSH enabled, has
> no impact on wb-transient-vs-display IGT, which makes sense since the
> pipecontrol is now flushing the device cache after the render copy.
> Without EN_L3_RW_CCS_CACHE_FLUSH the test then fails, which is also
> expected since device cache is now dirty and display engine can't see
> the writes.
>
> 2. Disabling EN_L3_RW_CCS_CACHE_FLUSH, but keeping the driver global
> invalidation also has no impact on wb-transient-vs-display. This
> suggests that the global invalidation still works as expected and is
> flushing the device cache without EN_L3_RW_CCS_CACHE_FLUSH turned on.
>
> With that drop EN_L3_RW_CCS_CACHE_FLUSH.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> Cc: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h | 3 ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c | 1 -
> 2 files changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h
> index 0d1a4a9f4e11..88a01970cc5c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h
> @@ -387,9 +387,6 @@
>
> #define XE2_GLOBAL_INVAL XE_REG(0xb404)
>
> -#define SCRATCH1LPFC XE_REG(0xb474)
> -#define EN_L3_RW_CCS_CACHE_FLUSH REG_BIT(0)
> -
> #define XE2LPM_L3SQCREG5 XE_REG_MCR(0xb658)
>
> #define XE2_TDF_CTRL XE_REG(0xb418)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> index f82b3e8ac5c8..313cc4242281 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> @@ -110,7 +110,6 @@ static void xe_gt_enable_host_l2_vram(struct xe_gt *gt)
> return;
>
> if (!xe_gt_is_media_type(gt)) {
> - xe_mmio_write32(gt, SCRATCH1LPFC, EN_L3_RW_CCS_CACHE_FLUSH);
> reg = xe_gt_mcr_unicast_read_any(gt, XE2_GAMREQSTRM_CTRL);
> reg |= CG_DIS_CNTLBUS;
> xe_gt_mcr_multicast_write(gt, XE2_GAMREQSTRM_CTRL, reg);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-03 10:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-02 15:37 [PATCH] drm/xe/bmg: improve cache flushing behaviour Matthew Auld
2024-09-02 17:01 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for " Patchwork
2024-09-02 17:01 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-09-02 17:02 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-09-02 17:14 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-09-02 17:16 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-09-02 17:18 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-09-02 17:54 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-09-02 22:29 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2024-09-03 10:53 ` Nirmoy Das [this message]
2024-09-03 11:08 ` [PATCH] " Matthew Auld
2024-09-03 13:49 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-09-03 14:33 ` Matthew Auld
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9d3f3a9d-bfde-4a06-a776-743b1ed47236@linux.intel.com \
--to=nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox