messages from 2023-12-04 16:42:09 to 2023-12-05 20:00:54 UTC [more...]
[Intel-xe] [CI 01/16] drm/gpuvm: convert WARN() to drm_WARN() variants
2023-12-05 20:00 UTC (22+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] [CI 02/16] drm/gpuvm: don't always WARN in drm_gpuvm_check_overflow()
` [Intel-xe] [CI 03/16] drm/gpuvm: export drm_gpuvm_range_valid()
` [Intel-xe] [CI 04/16] drm/nouveau: make use of drm_gpuvm_range_valid()
` [Intel-xe] [CI 05/16] drm/gpuvm: add common dma-resv per struct drm_gpuvm
` [Intel-xe] [CI 06/16] drm/nouveau: make use of the GPUVM's shared dma-resv
` [Intel-xe] [CI 07/16] drm/gpuvm: add drm_gpuvm_flags to drm_gpuvm
` [Intel-xe] [CI 08/16] drm/nouveau: separately allocate struct nouveau_uvmm
` [Intel-xe] [CI 09/16] drm/gpuvm: reference count drm_gpuvm structures
` [Intel-xe] [CI 10/16] drm/gpuvm: add an abstraction for a VM / BO combination
` [Intel-xe] [CI 11/16] drm/gpuvm: track/lock/validate external/evicted objects
` [Intel-xe] [CI 12/16] drm/xe: Adjust to "drm/gpuvm: add common dma-resv per struct drm_gpuvm"
` [Intel-xe] [CI 13/16] drm/xe: Adjust to commit "drm/gpuvm: add drm_gpuvm_flags to drm_gpuvm"
` [Intel-xe] [CI 14/16] drm/xe: Adjust to commit drm/gpuvm: reference count drm_gpuvm structures
` [Intel-xe] [CI 15/16] drm/xe: Adjust to commit "drm/gpuvm: add an abstraction for a VM/BO combination"
` [Intel-xe] [CI 16/16] drm/xe: Use DRM_GPUVM_RESV_PROTECTED for gpuvm
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [CI,01/16] drm/gpuvm: convert WARN() to drm_WARN() variants
` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: "
` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Hooks: failure "
` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checksparse: warning "
[Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/vm: Avoid asid lookup if none allocated
2023-12-05 19:47 UTC (9+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: "
` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Hooks: failure "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.BAT: "
[Intel-xe] [PATCH] fixup! drm/xe: Make DRM_XE_DEVICE_QUERY_ENGINES future proof
2023-12-05 19:42 UTC (2+ messages)
[Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 0/5] Allow num_binds/num_batch_buffer to be zero IOCTLs
2023-12-05 19:20 UTC (6+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/5] drm/xe: Use a flags field instead of bools for VMA create
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/xe: Use a flags field instead of bools for sync parse
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/xe: Allow num_binds == 0 in VM bind IOCTL
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/xe: Allow num_batch_buffer == 0 in exec IOCTL
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 5/5] drm/xe: Take in-syncs into account when num_execs or num_binds == 0
[Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Rename info.supports_* to info.has_*
2023-12-05 18:59 UTC (8+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: "
` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Hooks: failure "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.BAT: "
[Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Expand XE_REG_OPTION_MASKED documentation
2023-12-05 18:14 UTC (5+ messages)
[Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/2] RFC: drm/xe/uapi: Return correct error code for xe_wait_user_fence_ioctl
2023-12-05 18:10 UTC (10+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe/uapi: add exec_queue_id member to drm_xe_wait_user_fence structure
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe: Return correct error code for xe_wait_user_fence_ioctl
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for RFC: drm/xe/uapi: "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: "
` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Hooks: failure "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success "
` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.BAT: failure "
[Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 0/9] Intel_fb.c refactoring
2023-12-05 17:26 UTC (18+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 1/9] Revert "FIXME: drm/i915: xe intel_fb.c framebuffer init and destroy xe changes"
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 2/9] fixup! FIXME: drm/i915/display: Remaining changes to make xe compile
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 3/9] drm/i915/display: use intel_bo_to_drm_bo in intel_fb.c
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 4/9] drm/i915/display: Convert intel_fb_modifier_to_tiling as non-static
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 5/9] drm/i915/display: Handle invalid fb_modifier in intel_fb_modifier_to_tiling
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 6/9] drm/i915/display: Split i915 specific code away from intel_fb.c
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 7/9] drm/i915/display: Add intel_fb_bo_framebuffer_fini
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 8/9] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 9/9] "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Intel_fb.c refactoring (rev6)
` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: "
` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Hooks: failure "
` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checksparse: warning "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.BAT: success "
[Intel-xe] [CI 1/4] drm/xe/kunit: Remove handling of XE_TEST_SUBPLATFORM_ANY
2023-12-05 16:43 UTC (11+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] [CI 2/4] drm/xe/kunit: Move fake pci data to test-priv
` [Intel-xe] [CI 3/4] drm/xe/kunit: Add stub to read_gmdid
` [Intel-xe] [CI 4/4] drm/xe/kunit: Test WAs for MTL and LNL
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [CI,1/4] drm/xe/kunit: Remove handling of XE_TEST_SUBPLATFORM_ANY
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: "
` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Hooks: failure "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.BAT: "
[Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Apply mask to RING IMR
2023-12-05 15:21 UTC (5+ messages)
[Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 0/3] drm/managed: Add drmm_release_action
2023-12-05 15:13 UTC (13+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/3] "
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/tests: managed: Extract device initialization into test init
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/tests: managed: Add a simple test for drmm_managed_release
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/managed: Add drmm_release_action (rev2)
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: "
` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checksparse: warning "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.BAT: success "
[Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/xe2: Add workaround 16021639441
2023-12-05 15:14 UTC (8+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: "
` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Hooks: failure "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.BAT: "
[Intel-xe] LLC configurating, mmap and bo cache management questions
2023-12-05 14:19 UTC
[Intel-xe] [PATCH] fixup! drm/xe/uc: Store firmware binary in system-memory backed BO
2023-12-05 11:28 UTC (3+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for "
[Intel-xe] [CI 01/12] drm/gpuvm: convert WARN() to drm_WARN() variants
2023-12-05 10:37 UTC (19+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] [CI 02/12] drm/gpuvm: don't always WARN in drm_gpuvm_check_overflow()
` [Intel-xe] [CI 03/12] drm/gpuvm: export drm_gpuvm_range_valid()
` [Intel-xe] [CI 04/12] drm/nouveau: make use of drm_gpuvm_range_valid()
` [Intel-xe] [CI 05/12] drm/gpuvm: add common dma-resv per struct drm_gpuvm
` [Intel-xe] [CI 06/12] drm/nouveau: make use of the GPUVM's shared dma-resv
` [Intel-xe] [CI 07/12] drm/gpuvm: add drm_gpuvm_flags to drm_gpuvm
` [Intel-xe] [CI 08/12] drm/nouveau: separately allocate struct nouveau_uvmm
` [Intel-xe] [CI 09/12] drm/gpuvm: reference count drm_gpuvm structures
` [Intel-xe] [CI 10/12] drm/gpuvm: add an abstraction for a VM / BO combination
` [Intel-xe] [CI 11/12] drm/gpuvm: track/lock/validate external/evicted objects
` [Intel-xe] [CI 12/12] drm/xe: Adjust to gpuvm updates
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [CI,01/12] drm/gpuvm: convert WARN() to drm_WARN() variants
` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: "
` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checksparse: warning "
` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.BAT: failure "
[Intel-xe] [PATCH V2] drm/xe/xe2: Add workaround 18032095049
2023-12-05 9:48 UTC (8+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/xe2: Add workaround 18032095049 (rev2)
` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.BAT: "
[Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 0/9] Intel_fb.c refactoring
2023-12-05 7:35 UTC (19+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 6/9] drm/i915/display: Split i915 specific code away from intel_fb.c
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 7/9] drm/i915/display: Add intel_fb_bo_framebuffer_fini
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 8/9] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 9/9] "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Intel_fb.c refactoring (rev4)
` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: "
` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Hooks: failure "
` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checksparse: warning "
` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.BAT: failure "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Intel_fb.c refactoring (rev5)
` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: "
` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Hooks: failure "
` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checksparse: warning "
` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.BAT: failure "
[Intel-xe] [PATCH V2] drm/xe/xe2: Add workaround 14019988906
2023-12-05 6:46 UTC (8+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/xe2: Add workaround 14019988906 (rev2)
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.BAT: "
[Intel-xe] [CI 01/13] drm/xe: Split xe_info_init
2023-12-05 4:54 UTC (21+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] [CI 02/13] drm/xe: Introduce xe_tile_init_early and use at earlier point in probe
` [Intel-xe] [CI 03/13] drm/xe: Map the entire BAR0 and hold onto the initial mapping
` [Intel-xe] [CI 04/13] drm/xe/device: Introduce xe_device_probe_early
` [Intel-xe] [CI 05/13] drm/xe: Don't "peek" into GMD_ID
` [Intel-xe] [CI 06/13] drm/xe: Move system memory management init to earlier point in probe
` [Intel-xe] [CI 07/13] drm/xe: Move force_wake "
` [Intel-xe] [CI 08/13] drm/xe: Reorder GGTT "
` [Intel-xe] [CI 09/13] drm/xe: Add a helper for DRM device-lifetime BO create
` [Intel-xe] [CI 10/13] drm/xe/uc: Split xe_uc_fw_init
` [Intel-xe] [CI 11/13] drm/xe/uc: Store firmware binary in system-memory backed BO
` [Intel-xe] [CI 12/13] drm/xe/uc: Extract xe_uc_sanitize_reset
` [Intel-xe] [CI 13/13] drm/xe/guc: Split GuC params used for "hwconfig" and "post-hwconfig"
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [CI,01/13] drm/xe: Split xe_info_init
` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.BAT: "
[Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/5] Allow num_binds/num_batch_buffer to be zero IOCTLs
2023-12-04 18:19 UTC (4+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 4/5] rm/xe: Allow num_batch_buffer == 0 in exec IOCTL
[Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/2] drm/managed: Add drmm_release_action
2023-12-05 1:16 UTC (4+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/2] drm/tests: managed: Add a simple test for drmm_managed_release
[Intel-xe] [CI 01/14] drm/xe: Fix header guard warning
2023-12-05 1:14 UTC (7+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] [CI 07/14] drm/xe: Split xe_info_init
` [Intel-xe] [CI 10/14] drm/xe/device: Introduce xe_device_probe_early
[Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/xe2: Add workaround 18032095049
2023-12-04 21:05 UTC (2+ messages)
[Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/xe2: Add workaround 14019988906
2023-12-04 20:14 UTC (2+ messages)
page: next (older) | prev (newer) | latest
- recent:[subjects (threaded)|topics (new)|topics (active)]
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox