From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
<maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>, <philippe.lecluse@intel.com>,
<mchehab@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [PATCH 28/37] drm/xe: Don't use engine_mask until after hwconfig parse
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 13:51:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y9ljGJwM9Ks/DabI@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230112222538.2000142-29-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 05:25:29PM -0500, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
>
> The IRQ and MCR init used engine_mask before hwconfig parse (currently
> faked), move these steps after the hwconfig parse.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c | 7 +++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_irq.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++---------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_irq.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> index 6cea15725cae..75150077d62c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> #include "xe_gt_sysfs.h"
> #include "xe_gt_topology.h"
> #include "xe_hw_fence.h"
> +#include "xe_irq.h"
> #include "xe_lrc.h"
> #include "xe_map.h"
> #include "xe_migrate.h"
> @@ -449,6 +450,12 @@ static int gt_fw_domain_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
> if (err)
> goto err_force_wake;
>
> + /* Enables per hw engine IRQs */
> + xe_gt_irq_postinstall(gt);
> +
> + /* Rerun MCR init as we now have hw engine list */
> + xe_gt_mcr_init(gt);
> +
> err = xe_hw_engines_init_early(gt);
> if (err)
> goto err_force_wake;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_irq.c
> index edebe1817400..92fe6b38d735 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_irq.c
> @@ -492,26 +492,32 @@ void xe_irq_reset(struct xe_device *xe)
> #endif
> }
>
> -void xe_irq_postinstall(struct xe_device *xe)
> +void xe_gt_irq_postinstall(struct xe_gt *gt)
> {
> - struct xe_gt *gt;
> - u8 id;
> + struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
>
> - for_each_gt(gt, xe, id) {
> - if (GRAPHICS_VERx100(xe) >= 1210) {
> - dg1_irq_postinstall(xe, gt);
> - } else if (GRAPHICS_VER(xe) >= 11) {
> - gen11_irq_postinstall(xe, gt);
> - } else {
> - drm_err(&xe->drm, "No interrupt postinstall hook");
> - }
> - }
> + if (GRAPHICS_VERx100(xe) >= 1210)
> + dg1_irq_postinstall(xe, gt);
> + else if (GRAPHICS_VER(xe) >= 11)
> + gen11_irq_postinstall(xe, gt);
> + else
> + drm_err(&xe->drm, "No interrupt postinstall hook");
>
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_DISPLAY)
> - gen11_display_irq_postinstall(xe);
> + if (gt->info.id == XE_GT0)
> + gen11_display_irq_postinstall(gt_to_xe(gt));
> #endif
> }
>
> +static void xe_irq_postinstall(struct xe_device *xe)
> +{
> + struct xe_gt *gt;
> + u8 id;
> +
> + for_each_gt(gt, xe, id)
> + xe_gt_irq_postinstall(gt);
> +}
> +
> static irq_handler_t xe_irq_handler(struct xe_device *xe)
> {
> if (GRAPHICS_VERx100(xe) >= 1210) {
> @@ -566,8 +572,6 @@ int xe_irq_install(struct xe_device *xe)
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> - xe_irq_postinstall(xe);
> -
> return err;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_irq.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_irq.h
> index 7aee8d259353..34ecf22b32d3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_irq.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_irq.h
> @@ -7,8 +7,10 @@
> #define _XE_IRQ_H_
>
> struct xe_device;
> +struct xe_gt;
>
> int xe_irq_install(struct xe_device *xe);
> +void xe_gt_irq_postinstall(struct xe_gt *gt);
> void xe_irq_shutdown(struct xe_device *xe);
> void xe_irq_suspend(struct xe_device *xe);
> void xe_irq_resume(struct xe_device *xe);
> --
> 2.38.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-31 18:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-12 22:25 [Intel-xe] [PATCH 00/37] Catching up since we went public Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 01/37] drm/msm: Fix compile error Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-31 18:48 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 02/37] drm/xe: Implement a local xe_mmio_wait32 Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-31 18:49 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-02-01 4:44 ` Matthew Brost
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 03/37] drm/xe: Stop using i915's range_overflows_t macro Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 04/37] drm/xe: Let's return last value read on xe_mmio_wait32 Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 05/37] drm/xe: Convert guc_ready to regular xe_mmio_wait32 Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 06/37] drm/xe: Wait for success on guc done Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 07/37] drm/xe: Remove i915_utils dependency from xe_guc_pc Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 08/37] drm/xe: Stop using i915_utils in xe_wopcm Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 09/37] drm/xe: Let's avoid i915_utils in the xe_force_wake Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 10/37] drm/xe: Convert xe_mmio_wait32 to us so we can stop using wait_for_us Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 11/37] drm/xe: Remove i915_utils dependency from xe_pcode Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 12/37] drm/xe/migrate: Add kerneldoc for the migrate subsystem Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-20 23:03 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 13/37] drm/xe: Take memory ref on kernel job creation Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 14/37] drm/xe: Add intel_pps support too Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 15/37] drm/xe: Rework initialisation ordering slightly so we can inherit fb Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 16/37] drm/xe: Implement stolen memory Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 17/37] drm/xe: Allow fbdev to allocate " Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-24 15:42 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 18/37] drm/xe: Implement initial hw readout for framebuffer Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-24 15:43 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 19/37] drm/xe: Put DPT into stolen memory, if available Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 20/37] drm/xe: Implement FBC support Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 21/37] drm/i915: Remove i915_drm_suspend_mode Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 22/37] drm/xe: Fix compilation when Xe driver is builtin Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 23/37] drm/xe: Fix dumb bo create Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 24/37] drm/i915: Expand force_probe to block probe of devices as well Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-20 23:08 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 25/37] drm/xe: Introduce force_probe parameter Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-20 23:07 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 26/37] Revert "drm/xe: Validate BO on CPU fault" Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-24 15:44 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 27/37] drm/xe: Ensure VMA not userptr before calling xe_bo_is_stolen Rodrigo Vivi
2023-02-03 19:56 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 28/37] drm/xe: Don't use engine_mask until after hwconfig parse Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-31 18:51 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 29/37] drm/xe: Fake pulling gt->info.engine_mask from hwconfig blob Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-31 19:03 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 30/37] drm/xe/guc: Report submission version of GuC firmware Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 31/37] drm/xe/guc: s/xe_guc_send_mmio/xe_guc_mmio_send Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 32/37] drm/xe/guc: Add support GuC MMIO send / recv Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 33/37] drm/xe: Make FBC check stolen at use time Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 34/37] drm/xe: Move xe_ttm_stolen_mgr_init back Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 35/37] drm/xe: Fix hidden gotcha regression with bo create Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 36/37] drm/xe: Fix xe_mmio_wait32 timeouts Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 37/37] drm/xe: enforce GSMBASE for DG1 instead of BAR2 Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-24 15:46 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-24 16:25 ` Lecluse, Philippe
2023-01-31 19:11 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-31 19:13 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-02-01 9:12 ` Matthew Auld
2023-02-01 9:13 ` Matthew Auld
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y9ljGJwM9Ks/DabI@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=philippe.lecluse@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox