From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: "Borah, Chaitanya Kumar" <chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com>
Cc: "iommu@lists.linux.dev" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Kurmi, Suresh Kumar" <suresh.kumar.kurmi@intel.com>,
"Saarinen, Jani" <jani.saarinen@intel.com>,
"jgg@nvidia.com" <jgg@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: Regression on linux-next (next-20250321)
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 13:43:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z+Rm9LweNAtQBrmD@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SJ1PR11MB61292F9467353BA9FBB8F4B6B9A62@SJ1PR11MB6129.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Chaitanya,
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 08:31:15AM +0000, Borah, Chaitanya Kumar wrote:
> > > `````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
> > > <4>[ 0.226495] Unpatched return thunk in use. This should not happen!
> > > <4>[ 0.226502] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c:3107 __warn_thunk+0x62/0x70
> >
> > Hmm....I wonder why x86 can be affected...
> >
> > The only four callers of iommu_dma_prepare_msi() are ARM platforms.
[...]
> > > Details log can be found in [3].
> >
> > And I can't see something obvious from the log..
> >
> > Would you please give the git-diff a try (drivers/iommu/iommu.c)?
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/Z+Itnw4ys6dmDsc+@nvidia.com/
> >
> > If this doesn't help, would you please give this a try?
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20250324170743.GA1339275@ax162/
> >
>
> Thank you, Nicolin, for your reply. Unfortunately, these changes
> does not solve the issue. (applied individually and together)
Would you please try the latest linux-next (next-20250326) and see
if the issue still occurs?
If it does occur with next-20250326, would you please try reverting
06d54f00f3f5a on top of the tree rather than bisect?
"06d54f00f3f5 iommu: Drop sw_msi from iommu_domain"
It still feels odd to me and Jason that this change would break x86.
So, we want to confirm that this is really the culprit.
Also, I think your platform doesn't set CONFIG_IRQ_MSI_IOMMU, would
you please check you .config file and confirm?
Thanks
Nicolin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-26 20:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-25 5:39 Regression on linux-next (next-20250321) Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2025-03-25 7:40 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-03-25 13:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-03-27 5:39 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-03-27 8:09 ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2025-03-26 8:31 ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2025-03-26 20:43 ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2025-03-27 8:46 ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z+Rm9LweNAtQBrmD@nvidia.com \
--to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jani.saarinen@intel.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=suresh.kumar.kurmi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox