From: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
To: Maciej Patelczyk <maciej.patelczyk@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe: introduce xe_gt_reset_wait to wait for async gt reset
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 16:54:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z1cEtYgIRzoaVRY4@black.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z1cB5Wx7AWUUD7L2@black.fi.intel.com>
On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 04:42:49PM +0200, Raag Jadav wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 03:12:09PM +0100, Maciej Patelczyk wrote:
> > The reset of the GT is asynchronous.
> > Adding a wait helper to wait until gt reset is done.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maciej Patelczyk <maciej.patelczyk@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_bo.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_mocs.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.h | 12 ++++++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_debugfs.c | 2 +-
> > 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_bo.c
> > index c9ec7a313c6b..b51434fc5bd1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_bo.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_bo.c
> > @@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ static int evict_test_run_tile(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_tile *tile, struc
> > */
> > for_each_gt(__gt, xe, id) {
> > xe_gt_reset_async(__gt);
> > - flush_work(&__gt->reset.worker);
> > + xe_gt_reset_wait(__gt);
>
> Why not just create a
>
> void xe_gt_reset_sync(gt)
> {
> xe_gt_reset_async()
> flush_work()
> }
>
> and use it instead?
Or perhaps reuse force_reset_sync()?
Raag
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-09 14:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-09 14:12 [PATCH 0/2] drm/xe: adding wait helper for gt async reset Maciej Patelczyk
2024-12-09 14:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe: introduce xe_gt_reset_wait to wait for async gt reset Maciej Patelczyk
2024-12-09 14:42 ` Raag Jadav
2024-12-09 14:54 ` Raag Jadav [this message]
2024-12-09 16:22 ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-12-09 19:39 ` Maciej Patelczyk
2024-12-09 20:05 ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-12-09 14:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe: make change ccs_mode a synchronous action Maciej Patelczyk
2024-12-09 16:26 ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-12-09 19:31 ` Maciej Patelczyk
2024-12-09 14:50 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: adding wait helper for gt async reset Patchwork
2024-12-09 14:50 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-12-09 14:51 ` ✗ CI.KUnit: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z1cEtYgIRzoaVRY4@black.fi.intel.com \
--to=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=maciej.patelczyk@intel.com \
--cc=niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox